At a brief Google:stip wrote:I'm as surprised as the rest of you, if this song is so iconic
#1 on NME's 100 Best Songs of the 1990s
# 2 on Pitchfork's Top 200 Tracks of the 1990s
The song's (unranked) entry in Time Magazine's All-Time Top 100 Songs
At a brief Google:stip wrote:I'm as surprised as the rest of you, if this song is so iconic
Yeah, wtf?Birds in Hell wrote:This thing didn't really shuffle along very much while I was asleep, hey?
Yeah, wtf?stip wrote:I don't know if I knew that song. It was good. Nice pick
I meant at the time.Birds in Hell wrote:At a brief Google:stip wrote:I'm as surprised as the rest of you, if this song is so iconic
#1 on NME's 100 Best Songs of the 1990s
# 2 on Pitchfork's Top 200 Tracks of the 1990s
The song's (unranked) entry in Time Magazine's All-Time Top 100 Songs
Which really makes my david bowie mistake all the more mind blowing. I saw this video plenty of times in the mid 90s, and had to have been well aware that it was some other band that wasn't bowie. But some time after that, in the late 90s/early aughts I forgot who this was and in my mind just assumed it was some random bowie track. It wasn't til Shatner covered it in the mid aughts that I realized it wasn't.Lament wrote:It was a 120 Minutes staple.
Yeah, fuck them and their fantastic writing.ABNorman wrote:I freakin' hate Pitchfork.
You say tomato.cutuphalfdead wrote:Yeah, fuck them and their fantastic writing.ABNorman wrote:I freakin' hate Pitchfork.
How did you end up a James fan, out of curiosity?stip wrote:I tended to shy away from britpop stuff at the time ( and still largely do ) so unless it's presence was pretty ubiquitous it would have been easy to miss.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.