MLB

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
MattA75
AnalLog
Posts: 1504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: MLB

Post by MattA75 »

@SkitchP wrote:
BigRedLedbetter wrote:I'm assuming with Wainright, Wacha, Lynn and Shelby Miller and Marco Gonzalez probably ready next year (Fuck the Cardinals ugh!) I don't see them making a qualifying offer to Masterson which makes this Rangers fan happy because I'd love to sign him in the offseason but not if it costs us what is looking like will be a top 3-5 pick and I think Mike Maddux could work wonders with him.
cutuphalfdead wrote:Masterson's FIP is well below his ERA, so it's reasonable to expect good things down the stretch.
Agreed. He also had a great year last year while battling through a knee injury which his pitching coach in Cleveland said may have led to his issues this year.

Teams in the top 10 (15 maybe??) dont lose their first round pick as compensation. I believe they just give a supplemental pick at the end of the 1st round to the team that lost the free agent.
Teams drafting in the top 10 don't lose that pick, they lose their next pick (i.e. 2nd round)
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: MLB

Post by @SkitchP »

MattA75 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
BigRedLedbetter wrote:I'm assuming with Wainright, Wacha, Lynn and Shelby Miller and Marco Gonzalez probably ready next year (Fuck the Cardinals ugh!) I don't see them making a qualifying offer to Masterson which makes this Rangers fan happy because I'd love to sign him in the offseason but not if it costs us what is looking like will be a top 3-5 pick and I think Mike Maddux could work wonders with him.
cutuphalfdead wrote:Masterson's FIP is well below his ERA, so it's reasonable to expect good things down the stretch.
Agreed. He also had a great year last year while battling through a knee injury which his pitching coach in Cleveland said may have led to his issues this year.

Teams in the top 10 (15 maybe??) dont lose their first round pick as compensation. I believe they just give a supplemental pick at the end of the 1st round to the team that lost the free agent.
Teams drafting in the top 10 don't lose that pick, they lose their next pick (i.e. 2nd round)

gotcha.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

I'm in the newsroom today and it's always hilarious listening to people who aren't into sports try to make sense of this stuff.
User avatar
BigRedLedbetter
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5401
Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska

Re: MLB

Post by BigRedLedbetter »

MattA75 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
BigRedLedbetter wrote:I'm assuming with Wainright, Wacha, Lynn and Shelby Miller and Marco Gonzalez probably ready next year (Fuck the Cardinals ugh!) I don't see them making a qualifying offer to Masterson which makes this Rangers fan happy because I'd love to sign him in the offseason but not if it costs us what is looking like will be a top 3-5 pick and I think Mike Maddux could work wonders with him.
cutuphalfdead wrote:Masterson's FIP is well below his ERA, so it's reasonable to expect good things down the stretch.
Agreed. He also had a great year last year while battling through a knee injury which his pitching coach in Cleveland said may have led to his issues this year.

Teams in the top 10 (15 maybe??) dont lose their first round pick as compensation. I believe they just give a supplemental pick at the end of the 1st round to the team that lost the free agent.
Teams drafting in the top 10 don't lose that pick, they lose their next pick (i.e. 2nd round)
Oh nice. I was not sure how that worked. Thank you.
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

Drew to the Yankees.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

And Price to Detroit. It's gonna be one hell of an ALCS this year.
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15606
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: MLB

Post by Chris_H_2 »

I'm guessing Andrew Miller will no longer be trending on Twitter.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: MLB

Post by elliseamos »

considering what TB got for Price. I'm liking the Sox deal much more. Then factor in the Lackey deal, and I have to say that Cherington did extremely well today.

Detroit and Oakland certainly look like favorites in the AL (I'm going to go ahead and sleep on Balt'more). St. Louis certainly helped themselves, but did they catch up with the Dodgers and Brewers? I don't think so, but what do I know.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

elliseamos wrote:considering what TB got for Price. I'm liking the Sox deal much more. Then factor in the Lackey deal, and I have to say that Cherington did extremely well today.

Detroit and Oakland certainly look like favorites in the AL (I'm going to go ahead and sleep on Balt'more). St. Louis certainly helped themselves, but did they catch up with the Dodgers and Brewers? I don't think so, but what do I know.
Now there may be a bit of a bias here, but I still think Toronto is the better team. In the next 2-3 weeks, the Jays should get Brett Lawrie, Edwin Encarnacion and Adam Lind off the DL. That's more of an improvement than any team made today.

Of course, that all hinges on rehab going smoothly for those three.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

The Rays are retarded.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: MLB

Post by elliseamos »

philpritchard wrote:
elliseamos wrote:considering what TB got for Price. I'm liking the Sox deal much more. Then factor in the Lackey deal, and I have to say that Cherington did extremely well today.

Detroit and Oakland certainly look like favorites in the AL (I'm going to go ahead and sleep on Balt'more). St. Louis certainly helped themselves, but did they catch up with the Dodgers and Brewers? I don't think so, but what do I know.
Now there may be a bit of a bias here, but I still think Toronto is the better team. In the next 2-3 weeks, the Jays should get Brett Lawrie, Edwin Encarnacion and Adam Lind off the DL. That's more of an improvement than any team made today.

Of course, that all hinges on rehab going smoothly for those three.
fine, i'll toss you a bone. i'll sleep on toronto, too.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: MLB

Post by elliseamos »

cutuphalfdead wrote:The Rays are retarded.
the sox did just what i was hoping they'd do, which is that they set the market.

if price is traded first, then lester (and lackey) wouldn't be worth what they were. the uncertainty of whether price would be moved inflated the sox two pitchers.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

elliseamos wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
elliseamos wrote:considering what TB got for Price. I'm liking the Sox deal much more. Then factor in the Lackey deal, and I have to say that Cherington did extremely well today.

Detroit and Oakland certainly look like favorites in the AL (I'm going to go ahead and sleep on Balt'more). St. Louis certainly helped themselves, but did they catch up with the Dodgers and Brewers? I don't think so, but what do I know.
Now there may be a bit of a bias here, but I still think Toronto is the better team. In the next 2-3 weeks, the Jays should get Brett Lawrie, Edwin Encarnacion and Adam Lind off the DL. That's more of an improvement than any team made today.

Of course, that all hinges on rehab going smoothly for those three.
fine, i'll toss you a bone. i'll sleep on toronto, too.
:luv:
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

elliseamos wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:The Rays are retarded.
the sox did just what i was hoping they'd do, which is that they set the market.

if price is traded first, then lester (and lackey) wouldn't be worth what they were. the uncertainty of whether price would be moved inflated the sox two pitchers.
The Rays should have gotten A LOT more back for Price.
MattA75
AnalLog
Posts: 1504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: MLB

Post by MattA75 »

Not enough bad things can happen to the Rays as far as I'm concerned...bunch of crybabies...good luck with David Price Tiger fans
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

Image
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15606
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: MLB

Post by Chris_H_2 »

Can someone tell me (1) if the Phillies have a plan, and (2) if they do, what that plan is?

Imbeciles . . .
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: MLB

Post by Coach »

elliseamos wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:The Rays are retarded.
the sox did just what i was hoping they'd do, which is that they set the market.

if price is traded first, then lester (and lackey) wouldn't be worth what they were. the uncertainty of whether price would be moved inflated the sox two pitchers.
THIS.

Also, if you judge Cherington just based on today, he gets a solid A. Now....don't get me started about failing to re-sign Lester...I just don't understand that logic. I'm thinking something in the 120-30 range would have gotten it done in Spring Training.

Who was the last Red Sox to actually enter free agency for real and then resign with the team? 'Tek?
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: MLB

Post by elliseamos »

Coach wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:The Rays are retarded.
the sox did just what i was hoping they'd do, which is that they set the market.

if price is traded first, then lester (and lackey) wouldn't be worth what they were. the uncertainty of whether price would be moved inflated the sox two pitchers.
THIS.

Also, if you judge Cherington just based on today, he gets a solid A. Now....don't get me started about failing to re-sign Lester...I just don't understand that logic. I'm thinking something in the 120-30 range would have gotten it done in Spring Training.

Who was the last Red Sox to actually enter free agency for real and then resign with the team? 'Tek?
that's the key phrase here, b/c i can only think of guys that were in contract years, but weren't allowed to get to FA.
User avatar
BigRedLedbetter
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5401
Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska

Re: MLB

Post by BigRedLedbetter »

cutuphalfdead wrote:Image

Hilarious :haha:

Yeah I was shocked the Rays didn't get more for Price. Can't believe they didn't get James McCann (catcher) or Crawford (their best pitching prospect)
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
Post Reply