Of course an opinion can't be wrong, but they can (and, in this case, are) poorly argued or defended. And yeah, I get it, my initial post in the Wire thread telling you to stfu was rude. But then I got serious and told you I'd be interested in reading you elaborate on your critique. Only after two pages of prying did you offer anything other than glib dismissiveness. Example:elliseamos wrote:and that's fine by me if you want to have that opinion. what bugs me the most (on this board specificially, platypus seemingly most often) is that people feel compelled to convince other people that their opinion is "wrong." please, as often happens, correct my spelling and my facts, but don't try and convince me of something i've decided for myself. i personally choose to believe that these characters demonstrated a range of behaviors, but ultimately, I don't believe they ever really learned anything. take Bubbles from The Wire as an example of somebody that learns something over 5 seasons of a series.
You keep making empty statements like this (in fact, this is the only statement you've made, over and over again) without providing examples. And if you want to simply piggyback on what Skitch said, why not address my responses to him?elliseamos wrote: i personally choose to believe that these characters demonstrated a range of behaviors, but ultimately, I don't believe they ever really learned anything.
Exchanging opinions about a piece of art can be enlightening and fun when both parties are engaged and offer thoughtful arguments. If all you offer is empty provocations like
andelliseamos wrote:breaking bad sucks.
andelliseamos wrote:it was the ssdd episode after episode.
andelliseamos wrote: it's annoying as FUCK.
and you take your sweet time before attempting to properly defend them, and then you don't properly defend them... yeah. That's a frustrating conversation to be a part of.elliseamos wrote:it shames this thread discussing it.