MLB

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21690
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: MLB

Post by Simple Torture »

BigRedLedbetter wrote:This is the longest game I have ever been at. As a Texas Rangers fan I have seen some (ok a lot) of bad baseball. This was an awful team but a good night. A lot of my all time fave Rangers were on this team though...Pudge, Ruben Sierra, Gabe Kapler, Frank Catalanotto, etc. Fun times. Sorry Red Sox faithful.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes ... 8250.shtml
Those 0-7s couldn't have felt good for Ruben Sierra or Trot Nixon.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

What a game! That entire series was unbelievable. I know it's a bit sad and says a lot about the last two decades of baseball in Toronto, but that may have been the most nerve-racking, exciting, intense series of baseball I've watch in 20 years.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

Also: Melky Cabrera went 3 for 5 with 5 walks, which I believe is the first time a batter reached base 8 times in a game since 1972.

Cabrera and Bautista were both intentionally walked twice.
User avatar
BigRedLedbetter
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5401
Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska

Re: MLB

Post by BigRedLedbetter »

Simple Torture wrote:
BigRedLedbetter wrote:This is the longest game I have ever been at. As a Texas Rangers fan I have seen some (ok a lot) of bad baseball. This was an awful team but a good night. A lot of my all time fave Rangers were on this team though...Pudge, Ruben Sierra, Gabe Kapler, Frank Catalanotto, etc. Fun times. Sorry Red Sox faithful.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes ... 8250.shtml
Those 0-7s couldn't have felt good for Ruben Sierra or Trot Nixon.
Haha for real. Those games kill your batting average.
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
User avatar
BigRedLedbetter
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5401
Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska

Re: MLB

Post by BigRedLedbetter »

philpritchard wrote:What a game! That entire series was unbelievable. I know it's a bit sad and says a lot about the last two decades of baseball in Toronto, but that may have been the most nerve-racking, exciting, intense series of baseball I've watch in 20 years.
You guys are sitting in a good spot. I think you get one of those WC spots.

Very good year for Melky. Playing himself into a good long term deal somewhere. I could see my Rangers offering him a 3-4 year deal. He is just turning 30 tomorrow.
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
User avatar
CopperTom
Champion of RM
Posts: 10822
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania

Re: MLB

Post by CopperTom »

BigRedLedbetter wrote:
philpritchard wrote:What a game! That entire series was unbelievable. I know it's a bit sad and says a lot about the last two decades of baseball in Toronto, but that may have been the most nerve-racking, exciting, intense series of baseball I've watch in 20 years.
You guys are sitting in a good spot. I think you get one of those WC spots.

Very good year for Melky. Playing himself into a good long term deal somewhere. I could see my Rangers offering him a 3-4 year deal. He is just turning 30 tomorrow.
he's a mental midget. He would relax too much with a multi year deal.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
User avatar
BigRedLedbetter
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5401
Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska

Re: MLB

Post by BigRedLedbetter »

CopperTom wrote:
BigRedLedbetter wrote:
philpritchard wrote:What a game! That entire series was unbelievable. I know it's a bit sad and says a lot about the last two decades of baseball in Toronto, but that may have been the most nerve-racking, exciting, intense series of baseball I've watch in 20 years.
You guys are sitting in a good spot. I think you get one of those WC spots.

Very good year for Melky. Playing himself into a good long term deal somewhere. I could see my Rangers offering him a 3-4 year deal. He is just turning 30 tomorrow.
he's a mental midget. He would relax too much with a multi year deal.
I don't disagree (mental midget) but as well as he has played someone will bite the bullet and give him a multi year deal. He has earned it.

What is your feeling on Heyward? Having a great year this year and a FA end of next year. Think you will sell high and trade him this offseason?
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
User avatar
CopperTom
Champion of RM
Posts: 10822
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania

Re: MLB

Post by CopperTom »

BigRedLedbetter wrote:
CopperTom wrote:
BigRedLedbetter wrote:
philpritchard wrote:What a game! That entire series was unbelievable. I know it's a bit sad and says a lot about the last two decades of baseball in Toronto, but that may have been the most nerve-racking, exciting, intense series of baseball I've watch in 20 years.
You guys are sitting in a good spot. I think you get one of those WC spots.

Very good year for Melky. Playing himself into a good long term deal somewhere. I could see my Rangers offering him a 3-4 year deal. He is just turning 30 tomorrow.
he's a mental midget. He would relax too much with a multi year deal.
I don't disagree (mental midget) but as well as he has played someone will bite the bullet and give him a multi year deal. He has earned it.

What is your feeling on Heyward? Having a great year this year and a FA end of next year. Think you will sell high and trade him this offseason?
Should they? Yes. Will they? No.

Gattis will be the one that's traded. We need a leadoff hitter.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

I don't think the Braves would get nearly enough in return if they traded Hayward. A huge portion of his value is in his defense, and that still tends to be underrated.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: MLB

Post by elliseamos »

philpritchard wrote:I don't think the Braves would get nearly enough in return if they traded Hayward. A huge portion of his value is in his defense, and that still tends to be underrated.
the sox got peavy for iglesias's defensive value to the tigers. then again, stephen drew's defensive value wasn't worth multiple years and a compensation pick.
User avatar
BigRedLedbetter
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5401
Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska

Re: MLB

Post by BigRedLedbetter »

CopperTom wrote:
BigRedLedbetter wrote:
CopperTom wrote:
BigRedLedbetter wrote:
philpritchard wrote:What a game! That entire series was unbelievable. I know it's a bit sad and says a lot about the last two decades of baseball in Toronto, but that may have been the most nerve-racking, exciting, intense series of baseball I've watch in 20 years.
You guys are sitting in a good spot. I think you get one of those WC spots.

Very good year for Melky. Playing himself into a good long term deal somewhere. I could see my Rangers offering him a 3-4 year deal. He is just turning 30 tomorrow.
he's a mental midget. He would relax too much with a multi year deal.
I don't disagree (mental midget) but as well as he has played someone will bite the bullet and give him a multi year deal. He has earned it.

What is your feeling on Heyward? Having a great year this year and a FA end of next year. Think you will sell high and trade him this offseason?
Should they? Yes. Will they? No.

Gattis will be the one that's traded. We need a leadoff hitter.
Peraza looks pretty athletic. I wonder if they will move him to the OF and try him at leadoff sometime next year.
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
User avatar
BigRedLedbetter
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5401
Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska

Re: MLB

Post by BigRedLedbetter »

philpritchard wrote:I don't think the Braves would get nearly enough in return if they traded Hayward. A huge portion of his value is in his defense, and that still tends to be underrated.
Thing about Heyward is he's still young and I think if you put him in a better hitters park he can be a 30 homer a year guy.

Agreed though that his D is his best attribute. Fantastic right fielder.
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

elliseamos wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I don't think the Braves would get nearly enough in return if they traded Hayward. A huge portion of his value is in his defense, and that still tends to be underrated.
the sox got peavy for iglesias's defensive value to the tigers. then again, stephen drew's defensive value wasn't worth multiple years and a compensation pick.
Exactly. We got nothing back for Iglesias.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I don't think the Braves would get nearly enough in return if they traded Hayward. A huge portion of his value is in his defense, and that still tends to be underrated.
the sox got peavy for iglesias's defensive value to the tigers. then again, stephen drew's defensive value wasn't worth multiple years and a compensation pick.
Exactly. We got nothing back for Iglesias.
Peavy was decent in the 2nd half for them, hell the first half of this year. It wasnt a huge return, but then again, Iglesias isnt that good.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I don't think the Braves would get nearly enough in return if they traded Hayward. A huge portion of his value is in his defense, and that still tends to be underrated.
the sox got peavy for iglesias's defensive value to the tigers. then again, stephen drew's defensive value wasn't worth multiple years and a compensation pick.
Exactly. We got nothing back for Iglesias.
Peavy was decent in the 2nd half for them, hell the first half of this year. It wasnt a huge return, but then again, Iglesias isnt that good.
Peavy was a second Ryan Dempster and did almost nothing to help us win.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I don't think the Braves would get nearly enough in return if they traded Hayward. A huge portion of his value is in his defense, and that still tends to be underrated.
the sox got peavy for iglesias's defensive value to the tigers. then again, stephen drew's defensive value wasn't worth multiple years and a compensation pick.
Exactly. We got nothing back for Iglesias.
Peavy was decent in the 2nd half for them, hell the first half of this year. It wasnt a huge return, but then again, Iglesias isnt that good.
Peavy was a second Ryan Dempster and did almost nothing to help us win.
He kept Ryan Dempster(and Webster, Workman, etc.) out of the rotation, and gave them quality starts. Had Lester or Lackey gone down, Peavy would have been more valuable conceivably. I'd still make that trade today and have no problem with it.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I don't think the Braves would get nearly enough in return if they traded Hayward. A huge portion of his value is in his defense, and that still tends to be underrated.
the sox got peavy for iglesias's defensive value to the tigers. then again, stephen drew's defensive value wasn't worth multiple years and a compensation pick.
Exactly. We got nothing back for Iglesias.
Peavy was decent in the 2nd half for them, hell the first half of this year. It wasnt a huge return, but then again, Iglesias isnt that good.
Peavy was a second Ryan Dempster and did almost nothing to help us win.
He kept Ryan Dempster(and Webster, Workman, etc.) out of the rotation, and gave them quality starts. Had Lester or Lackey gone down, Peavy would have been more valuable conceivably. I'd still make that trade today and have no problem with it.
We gave up a star defensive shortstop, which we had to resign stephen drew to address the hole it left, in order to get a 4.04 ERA (Peavy's with the Sox in 2013) instead of a 4.9 (Workman's that year). Not worth it as far as I'm concerned. We still make the playoffs without Peavy in 2013 and once we got there he was garbage.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I don't think the Braves would get nearly enough in return if they traded Hayward. A huge portion of his value is in his defense, and that still tends to be underrated.
the sox got peavy for iglesias's defensive value to the tigers. then again, stephen drew's defensive value wasn't worth multiple years and a compensation pick.
Exactly. We got nothing back for Iglesias.
Peavy was decent in the 2nd half for them, hell the first half of this year. It wasnt a huge return, but then again, Iglesias isnt that good.
Peavy was a second Ryan Dempster and did almost nothing to help us win.
He kept Ryan Dempster(and Webster, Workman, etc.) out of the rotation, and gave them quality starts. Had Lester or Lackey gone down, Peavy would have been more valuable conceivably. I'd still make that trade today and have no problem with it.
We gave up a star defensive shortstop, which we had to resign stephen drew to address the hole it left, in order to get a 4.04 ERA (Peavy's with the Sox in 2013) instead of a 4.9 (Workman's that year). Not worth it as far as I'm concerned. We still make the playoffs without Peavy in 2013 and once we got there he was garbage.
He didnt pitch well in the World Series, but had a very good start against Tampa in the DS. Maybe they didnt need to make the trade when all was said and done, but it was prudent to solidify the rotation before the stretch run. Iglesias, while an incredible defender, cannot hit, and I'm ok with letting him walk when you have Bogaerts and Marerro right behind him in the system.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I don't think the Braves would get nearly enough in return if they traded Hayward. A huge portion of his value is in his defense, and that still tends to be underrated.
the sox got peavy for iglesias's defensive value to the tigers. then again, stephen drew's defensive value wasn't worth multiple years and a compensation pick.
Exactly. We got nothing back for Iglesias.
Peavy was decent in the 2nd half for them, hell the first half of this year. It wasnt a huge return, but then again, Iglesias isnt that good.
Peavy was a second Ryan Dempster and did almost nothing to help us win.
He kept Ryan Dempster(and Webster, Workman, etc.) out of the rotation, and gave them quality starts. Had Lester or Lackey gone down, Peavy would have been more valuable conceivably. I'd still make that trade today and have no problem with it.
We gave up a star defensive shortstop, which we had to resign stephen drew to address the hole it left, in order to get a 4.04 ERA (Peavy's with the Sox in 2013) instead of a 4.9 (Workman's that year). Not worth it as far as I'm concerned. We still make the playoffs without Peavy in 2013 and once we got there he was garbage.
He didnt pitch well in the World Series, but had a very good start against Tampa in the DS. Maybe they didnt need to make the trade when all was said and done, but it was prudent to solidify the rotation before the stretch run. Iglesias, while an incredible defender, cannot hit, and I'm ok with letting him walk when you have Bogaerts and Marerro right behind him in the system.
Except for his rookie year in which he hi 258, Ozzie Smith didn't crack 250 until his 7th year in the majors. He didn't touch .280 until his 8th year. Bats can come around later, and Igeslias's defense was that good.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I don't think the Braves would get nearly enough in return if they traded Hayward. A huge portion of his value is in his defense, and that still tends to be underrated.
the sox got peavy for iglesias's defensive value to the tigers. then again, stephen drew's defensive value wasn't worth multiple years and a compensation pick.
Exactly. We got nothing back for Iglesias.
Peavy was decent in the 2nd half for them, hell the first half of this year. It wasnt a huge return, but then again, Iglesias isnt that good.
Peavy was a second Ryan Dempster and did almost nothing to help us win.
He kept Ryan Dempster(and Webster, Workman, etc.) out of the rotation, and gave them quality starts. Had Lester or Lackey gone down, Peavy would have been more valuable conceivably. I'd still make that trade today and have no problem with it.
We gave up a star defensive shortstop, which we had to resign stephen drew to address the hole it left, in order to get a 4.04 ERA (Peavy's with the Sox in 2013) instead of a 4.9 (Workman's that year). Not worth it as far as I'm concerned. We still make the playoffs without Peavy in 2013 and once we got there he was garbage.
He didnt pitch well in the World Series, but had a very good start against Tampa in the DS. Maybe they didnt need to make the trade when all was said and done, but it was prudent to solidify the rotation before the stretch run. Iglesias, while an incredible defender, cannot hit, and I'm ok with letting him walk when you have Bogaerts and Marerro right behind him in the system.
Except for his rookie year in which he hi 258, Ozzie Smith didn't crack 250 until his 7th year in the majors. He didn't touch .280 until his 8th year. Bats can come around later, and Igeslias's defense was that good.
You know as well as I do he was doing it with smoke and mirrors, you were watching the same games. The guy had so many weird bloopy infield hits in the first half. I'm not saying Iglesias isnt an amazing shortstop, and that I wouldnt want him on the team now. I was willing to make that sacrifice to get a 3rd starter in here and go for that World Series. Just like I would be willing to trade Bradley this year for someone like Peavy if they were in the same spot.
Post Reply