BurtReynolds wrote:is a hand wave good or bad?
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Haha, no, it means so-so. Like I'm shaking my hand saying "ehhhhhh..."Kaius wrote:is the wave the best you can get or the worst? I can't figure it out.
BurtReynolds wrote:is a hand wave good or bad?
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Haha, no, it means so-so. Like I'm shaking my hand saying "ehhhhhh..."Kaius wrote:is the wave the best you can get or the worst? I can't figure it out.
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
Jorge wrote:I remember I was in Miami when it happened. I was posting from the balcony of my apartment overlooking the beach. And I was having an argument with Adamdude.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Yikes. Are you usually a Linklater fan? I am not, but the trailer looks really good.LoathedVermin72 wrote: -Boyhood (2014)![]()
![]()
![]()
:
I am absolutely beyond fascinated with Wyatt Earp/Tombstone, AZ/that whole era, but I cannot seem to make it through this movie. The beginning seems to drag on forever and I end up changing the channel. I think people either like this movie or Tombstone and I am a big fan of the latter...Kurt Russell and Val Kilmer were outstanding, IMO. Other than Field of Dreams, I never really liked any of Costner's movies so that might be part of the reason why I lose interest. heh.LoathedVermin72 wrote:-Wyatt Earp (1994)![]()
Love this movie... It's really the only thing Tom Waits has ever done that I like.Simple Torture wrote:Cigarettes and Coffee (1993)
You're thinking of Coffee and Cigarettes (2003)Iholdthepain wrote:Love this movie... It's really the only thing Tom Waits has ever done that I like.Simple Torture wrote:Cigarettes and Coffee (1993)
McParadigm wrote:lol
I actually am not. Before Sunset is very good and Before Midnight is excellent but I attribute their success mostly to Hawke and Delpy. I found Boyhood to be a flatly directed, awkwardly assembled, poorly written and acted, thoughtless, empty celebration of the American status quo. I really can't imagine what other people are getting from it outside of simply recognizing themselves in the protagonist.The Argonaut wrote:Yikes. Are you usually a Linklater fan? I am not, but the trailer looks really good.LoathedVermin72 wrote: -Boyhood (2014)![]()
![]()
![]()
:
Ha, I’m the opposite. I’ve never liked Tombstone, and never believed Russell or Kilmer in the roles (even though I like them both as actors). On the other hand, I thought Costner and Quaid gave amazing, convincing performances.TwoAlarmFire wrote:I am absolutely beyond fascinated with Wyatt Earp/Tombstone, AZ/that whole era, but I cannot seem to make it through this movie. The beginning seems to drag on forever and I end up changing the channel. I think people either like this movie or Tombstone and I am a big fan of the latter...Kurt Russell and Val Kilmer were outstanding, IMO. Other than Field of Dreams, I never really liked any of Costner's movies so that might be part of the reason why I lose interest. heh.LoathedVermin72 wrote:-Wyatt Earp (1994)![]()
wow. i remember when i first brought up that i didn't care for Tombstone...for the same reasons as you. i was almost tarred, feathered and run out of town.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Ha, I’m the opposite. I’ve never liked Tombstone, and never believed Russell or Kilmer in the roles (even though I like them both as actors). On the other hand, I thought Costner and Quaid gave amazing, convincing performances.TwoAlarmFire wrote:I am absolutely beyond fascinated with Wyatt Earp/Tombstone, AZ/that whole era, but I cannot seem to make it through this movie. The beginning seems to drag on forever and I end up changing the channel. I think people either like this movie or Tombstone and I am a big fan of the latter...Kurt Russell and Val Kilmer were outstanding, IMO. Other than Field of Dreams, I never really liked any of Costner's movies so that might be part of the reason why I lose interest. heh.LoathedVermin72 wrote:-Wyatt Earp (1994)![]()
But the movies are very, very different. Tombstone is basically just pulpy fun that focuses specifically on the O.K. Corral incident, whereas Wyatt Earp is a sprawling, psychological character study that traces the roots of who Earp was and treats the O.K. Corral incident as merely a significant event in a long life.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Being a cabbie can be a lonely job.theplatypus wrote: Costner's Waterworld.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Jorge wrote:I remember I was in Miami when it happened. I was posting from the balcony of my apartment overlooking the beach. And I was having an argument with Adamdude.