U2 | Songs of Innocence

Other than Pearl Jam, who else is there?
Post Reply
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by Norah »

McParadigm wrote:I also like Edge's place/lack of dominance. Not really a big guitar album.
He's not really soloing, more just playing patterns.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by McParadigm »

Force of nature would fit really well on this record, now that you mention it.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Blaine Ryan
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 431
Joined: Wed November 06, 2013 9:16 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by Blaine Ryan »

I think "The Troubles" is up there with the best songs of their post-millenial career. Love that Lykke Li guest spot.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by Kaius »

Yeah, it's definitely the best song.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by BurtReynolds »

Seems like Apple got the bad end of the deal. U2 gets a fat check and a decent marketing bump (as decent as they can get at this point in their career), meanwhile Apple basically admits iTunes and the music industry is completely dead by giving away free music.

Giving an entire album away in the Spotify/youtube era is meaningless. Giving something with no value away for free isn't that impressive anymore, especially when that stunt has already been tried.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Sgt. Crackpot
F.U.B.A.R
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
Location: Lft Craquepeau
Contact:

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by Sgt. Crackpot »

BurtReynolds wrote:Seems like Apple got the bad end of the deal. U2 gets a fat check and a decent marketing bump (as decent as they can get at this point in their career), meanwhile Apple basically admits iTunes and the music industry is completely dead by giving away free music.

Giving an entire album away in the Spotify/youtube era is meaningless. Giving something with no value away for free isn't that impressive anymore, especially when that stunt has already been tried.
Would it have worked better if they paid people to have it? That's the next logical step, right? :D
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour :(
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by dimejinky99 »

I liked No Line on the horizon..it was different.

this sounds familiar so far, but not rehashed.

I'll give it a fair hearing.

Song for someone is good..the only obvious 'U2 doing U2' moment on here, and it works, where they have failed trying to capture that in recent records.

I know cedarwood road..wonder what or who he's talking about?
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by dimejinky99 »

"U2 are the money lenders in the temple," sez John Doran for The Quietus. An article well worth reading.

http://thequietus.com/articles/16217-bo ... experience
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by stip »

dimejinky99 wrote:"U2 are the money lenders in the temple," sez John Doran for The Quietus. An article well worth reading.

http://thequietus.com/articles/16217-bo ... experience
I have a longish response I want to make to this piece but I may not have time to write until tomorrow. So be patient and in the meantime I want everyone to do the readings and be prepared to discuss. I know Pryto and I are going to disagree. (His blog post he linked was a good read btw).
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by stip »

After a few listens (although it needs more) I am worried the more interesting tracks will not survive the descent into familiarity. It bodes poorly that my favorite moment is the guest vocals.
User avatar
Heathen
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3988
Joined: Wed January 30, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by Heathen »

stip wrote:(His blog post he linked was a good read btw).
The one that goes

RANDOM WORD

random thought

RANDOM WORD

random thought

RANDOM WORD

random thought

RANDOM WORD

random thought

RANDOM WORD

random thought

?

ugh
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by stip »

Yeah, that one.
User avatar
Heathen
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3988
Joined: Wed January 30, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by Heathen »

Terrible writing.
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
User avatar
Heathen
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3988
Joined: Wed January 30, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by Heathen »

It's like he's thinking out loud, writing down whatever comes to him, and his own thoughts appear to sound like genius statements to him when they're really mundane or downright stupid.
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
User avatar
Sgt. Crackpot
F.U.B.A.R
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
Location: Lft Craquepeau
Contact:

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by Sgt. Crackpot »

The difference between stupid and genius, is that genius has its limits.
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour :(
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by McParadigm »

And you guys think we give Pearl Jam too much shit for making bad records and selling stupid merch.

"This asshole Bono isn't even really saving the world."
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by Norah »

BurtReynolds wrote:Giving an entire album away in the Spotify/youtube era is meaningless. Giving something with no value away for free isn't that impressive anymore, especially when that stunt has already been tried.
It's not meaningless if you care about sound quality. I'd take lossy itunes files over spotify/youtube streams any day.
nyquillyn
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by nyquillyn »

Spotify Premium streams at 320 kbps (Ogg Vorbis).
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by McParadigm »

Heathen wrote:It's like he's thinking out loud, writing down whatever comes to him, and his own thoughts appear to sound like genius statements to him when they're really mundane or downright stupid.
It's best summarized by this beginning to another post on the site:
Can I recommend a book?

You remember books, that antiquated media model that requires dedication in our fast-moving society that is usually populated by quick-read genre trash.

“We Are Not Ourselves” is not that. If it were a TV show, they’d call it a family drama.
So, to summarize:

1. Opening line

2. Unnecessary bullshit statement, preferably wordy, that sounds switched on but in fact establishes a bunch of false assumptions (average book size has been ballooning for years, "genre trash" is a lazy toss-off implying that, if it has a genre, then it must be trash, and the 13-29 year olds he thinks rule the world average more leisure reading time today than at any time during the 1980-90s).

3. Illustrates that he is, in fact, probably the problem he assumes exists...the best he can think to do is compare the book he's trying to push to a television show genre.
(patriotic choking noises)
Post Reply