U2 | Songs of Innocence

Other than Pearl Jam, who else is there?
Post Reply
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by stip »

I spoke to my students about this on Thursday, since I was curious about their reaction. So after talking to 60 larger middle/working class kids on long island (mix of white, black, hispanic, ages 18-22) I discovered the following:

1. Most had no idea.
2. Most did not care.
3. A few people did say there were more likely to give it a listen since it was made available for free and already on their ipod/phone/account, etc.
4. A few thought this would be really cool if they gave a shit about u2
5. A handful of people who were already u2 fans (not many) were glad they got it for free.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35453
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by spike »

dimejinky99 wrote:Only 200,000 copies downloaded. That's a staggeringly poor amount. The rest aren't happy about it apparently
http://www.irishtimes.com/business/sect ... -1.1926732
i think that's misleading; it's still very early days and the album had no promotion leading up to its release or the benefit of a lead single. there are some catchy songs on the record, i'm sure one or two will catch on and propel album sales/downloads to less embarrassing levels.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by stip »

I think I'd give this a 6.5 or a 7. I'd put it on par with soundgarden's most recent album. Better than the AIC records and FAR better than Smashing Pumpkins. Not nearly as good as REM's last album (you know how I feel, and continue to feel, about Lightning Bolt). But some songs that are pretty good (we'll see if they grow or diminish with time), and a number of interesting directions that could and should be explored. Certainly good enough to justify continuing, especially if they focus on further developing the best moments.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by stip »

spike wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:Only 200,000 copies downloaded. That's a staggeringly poor amount. The rest aren't happy about it apparently
http://www.irishtimes.com/business/sect ... -1.1926732
i think that's misleading; it's still very early days and the album had no promotion leading up to its release or the benefit of a lead single. there are some catchy songs on the record, i'm sure one or two will catch on and propel album sales/downloads to less embarrassing levels.
I have a good friend who is a die hard u2 fan and she hasn't heard it yet just because she's been too busy these last few days to get to it.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35453
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by spike »

stip wrote:
spike wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:Only 200,000 copies downloaded. That's a staggeringly poor amount. The rest aren't happy about it apparently
http://www.irishtimes.com/business/sect ... -1.1926732
i think that's misleading; it's still very early days and the album had no promotion leading up to its release or the benefit of a lead single. there are some catchy songs on the record, i'm sure one or two will catch on and propel album sales/downloads to less embarrassing levels.
I have a good friend who is a die hard u2 fan and she hasn't heard it yet just because she's been too busy these last few days to get to it.
lol she probably can't figure out how to download it but is too embarrassed to admit it.
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by EJ »

“11 tracks of straightforward rapture about the life-saving joys of music.”
- David Fricke, Rolling Stone

oh, sweet jeezus.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by McParadigm »

Only 200,000 in two days. It's a catastrophe.

I did laugh at the "we talked to retailers who said the album would have opened with 500,000 if released normally." Dunno what the record is now, but Coldplay was the year's top debut as of 3 months ago....at 383,000.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Mike
Future Drummer
Posts: 3130
Joined: Sat August 24, 2013 2:33 pm
Location: Baltic Sea, Germany

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by Mike »

"for free to half a billion users of Apple’s iTunes software"
"A number of websites reported yesterday that less than 5 per cent of iTunes account holders have willingly downloaded the new album."
"It was reported that less than 200,000 active downloads had been made so far, according to Billboard. The group’s label has rejected this figure."

Less than 5 per cent is a very nice way of saying 0.04%.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35453
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by spike »

this is all just another brilliant maneuver by one of the biggest sell out bands around. they got their money and they're getting their publicity (good or bad), which is all bono ever wants anyway. it doesn't matter if only five people download it.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by McParadigm »

It looks to me like it's going to be a case of "The people who would have paid for it anyway are the ones who downloaded it for free. The people who wouldn't have bought it won't." 2-300,000 is very much in line with what I would have assumed for first week sales on this release.

Which leads to the possibility that there is a median with long-established acts...that, if we cross the line of wanting to hear something new from a known quantity, we also cross the line of being willing to pay for it. It doesn't seem all that contradictory with the last 10 years of industry trends, where "the real money" is increasingly seen as being found in artists who cater to the 40+ crowd.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by VinylGuy »

Guys, Sleep like a baby tonight is fucking awesome.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by stip »

it's good. I'm not prepared to call anything on this album fucking awesome just yet :)
User avatar
Blaine Ryan
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 431
Joined: Wed November 06, 2013 9:16 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by Blaine Ryan »

Do you guys think this thought is fair? (from the Pitchfork review)
Accordingly, the music itself aims for a one-size-fits-all, vaguely inspirational tone, with a lean approach to details despite the press kit assertion that it’s all “very, very personal.” So a song about Bono meeting his wife is given the non-committal title of “Song for Someone”, and a song called “The Troubles” isn’t a callback to the prolonged Northern Ireland conflict that inspired their first great song, but a bunch of self-pitying platitudes (which uses guest Lykke Li to mimic adult-contempo Duran Duran hit “Come Undone”). Even Bono’s opening love letter to Joey Ramone is only given specificity by the title’s parenthetical, a generic “last night a [fill-in-the-blank] changed my life” tale that could be adapted to the idol of your choosing. It’s all emotional content left intentionally formless, vaingloriously hoping to fit around the experiences of millions.
I keep going back and forth on it because I favor specificity in my songwriting, but wouldn't begrudge anyone who goes for something more general.
User avatar
Blaine Ryan
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 431
Joined: Wed November 06, 2013 9:16 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by Blaine Ryan »

theplatypus wrote:I don't know if it's due to the kind of people and publications that I follow on Twitter, but it feels like everybody's shitting on this album.

http://www.stereogum.com/1704542/premat ... valuation/
This is like the third review I've read that calls it out for not having good melodies. I really disagree with that point, personally. I kind of agree that "Iris" doesn't take off like it should, but that's about it.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by McParadigm »

Blaine Ryan wrote:Do you guys think this thought is fair? (from the Pitchfork review)

I keep going back and forth on it because I favor specificity in my songwriting, but wouldn't begrudge anyone who goes for something more general.
Slide on next to me. I'm just a human being.
I will take the blame, but just the same
this is not me
you see.
(patriotic choking noises)
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by Kaius »

1-5 are pretty much soupy turds.

6-11 are solid pieces of music, ranging from dirt to diamond.

The Troubles Diamond
Sleep Like a Baby
Raised By Wolves
Volcano
This is Where...
Cedar wood Road Dirt
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by stip »

Blaine Ryan wrote:Do you guys think this thought is fair? (from the Pitchfork review)
Accordingly, the music itself aims for a one-size-fits-all, vaguely inspirational tone, with a lean approach to details despite the press kit assertion that it’s all “very, very personal.” So a song about Bono meeting his wife is given the non-committal title of “Song for Someone”, and a song called “The Troubles” isn’t a callback to the prolonged Northern Ireland conflict that inspired their first great song, but a bunch of self-pitying platitudes (which uses guest Lykke Li to mimic adult-contempo Duran Duran hit “Come Undone”). Even Bono’s opening love letter to Joey Ramone is only given specificity by the title’s parenthetical, a generic “last night a [fill-in-the-blank] changed my life” tale that could be adapted to the idol of your choosing. It’s all emotional content left intentionally formless, vaingloriously hoping to fit around the experiences of millions.
I keep going back and forth on it because I favor specificity in my songwriting, but wouldn't begrudge anyone who goes for something more general.
Still haven't paid attention to lyrics, but in theory this doesn't bother me in the slightest. It's just a different type of writing. You can do both well, and you can do both poorly
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by EJ »

California is the only real fecalesque song here.

Most of the others rate inoffensive to decent.

The Troubles, Sleep Like A Baby, and This Is Where... all give hope that the band still has some interesting things to share.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by Kaius »

EJ wrote:California is the only real fecalesque song here.

Most of the others rate inoffensive to decent.

The Troubles, Sleep Like A Baby, and This Is Where... all give hope that the band still has some interesting things to share.
:thumbsup:
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: U2 | Songs of Innocence

Post by VinylGuy »

i want to know Lament´s view on this new album.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
Post Reply