Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Green Habit »

Orpheus wrote:NE has traded with Tampa a few times over the last few years and the trades have pretty much always handily been in NE's favor. I'm not expecting this to be much different. Tampa's FO loves making short-sighted decisions.
Belichick had to find someone to replace Al Davis in this department.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

That dropped interception by Goldson was an easy pick six and the game winner. Gonna be one of those seasons I guess.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Green Habit »

I think the future is bright for the Bucs because Lovie Smith is a proven winning coach. But I think they bungled the QB position and perhaps one year of pain to secure a good one in the 2015 draft may not be the end of the world.
User avatar
RussellManiac12
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 428
Joined: Fri January 11, 2013 8:58 pm
Location: Vancouver, WA

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by RussellManiac12 »

I never understood signing McCown and anointing him the starter immediately, if at all. I thought Glennon was pretty decent as the season went on last year - especially for a rookie. I figured if they added a couple of weapons, he would get even better. I watched a lot of the game yesterday, McCown was just awful.
User avatar
red calzolaio
AnalLog
Posts: 1478
Joined: Fri January 25, 2013 4:02 am

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by red calzolaio »

what's up with Doug Martin?
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

red calzolaio wrote:what's up with Doug Martin?
Mostly a bad offensive line, though he hurt his knee yesterday also
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

Green Habit wrote:I think the future is bright for the Bucs because Lovie Smith is a proven winning coach. But I think they bungled the QB position and perhaps one year of pain to secure a good one in the 2015 draft may not be the end of the world.
Definitely should have been a full on competition in camp and pre season but i don't think they really want glennon, and no one would give them enough for him before the draft.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Green Habit »

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
Green Habit wrote:I think the future is bright for the Bucs because Lovie Smith is a proven winning coach. But I think they bungled the QB position and perhaps one year of pain to secure a good one in the 2015 draft may not be the end of the world.
Definitely should have been a full on competition in camp and pre season but i don't think they really want glennon, and no one would give them enough for him before the draft.
If they don't want Glennon (and I think you're right), they should have drafted a QB in the first round. Banking on McCown was always going to be a very short term solution.
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

Green Habit wrote:
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
Green Habit wrote:I think the future is bright for the Bucs because Lovie Smith is a proven winning coach. But I think they bungled the QB position and perhaps one year of pain to secure a good one in the 2015 draft may not be the end of the world.
Definitely should have been a full on competition in camp and pre season but i don't think they really want glennon, and no one would give them enough for him before the draft.
If they don't want Glennon (and I think you're right), they should have drafted a QB in the first round. Banking on McCown was always going to be a very short term solution.
I really think they wanted bortles, i think they talked up manzel and the tedford/Carr connection hoping they would go early and bortles would be there for them. But at the same time, they had so many needs that they couldn't address them all so maybe they just hoped mccown would be good(and he could still be good enough to win enough games to miss out on a really high draft pick) and give them a couple of years to find the new franchises qb
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Jesus just put Glennon in. McCown is looking awful.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Jesus just put Glennon in. McCown is looking awful.
i didnt even get to see the game and i agree, but also it has to be said that tampa had the lead with about 4 minutes left and the rams starting on their own 8 and the D let a 3rd string QB drive down for a chip shot FG for the win
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Jesus just put Glennon in. McCown is looking awful.
i didnt even get to see the game and i agree, but also it has to be said that tampa had the lead with about 4 minutes left and the rams starting on their own 8 and the D let a 3rd string QB drive down for a chip shot FG for the win
I get that, but McCown looks like a backup QB that is getting his first start in five years. Evans and Jackson are making some great catches, but if they had someone who could make quicker decisions they would be nasty.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Jesus just put Glennon in. McCown is looking awful.
i didnt even get to see the game and i agree, but also it has to be said that tampa had the lead with about 4 minutes left and the rams starting on their own 8 and the D let a 3rd string QB drive down for a chip shot FG for the win
I get that, but McCown looks like a backup QB that is getting his first start in five years. Evans and Jackson are making some great catches, but if they had someone who could make quicker decisions they would be nasty.
im with you on that, i hated the McCown signing because the need to see what they have in Glennon, the kid played well enough last year to have gone into camp as the starter this year, but unfortunatly he played for another coach so that doesnt mean much now. but if they stink it up all season then they HAVE to draft a QB at the top of the draft next year unless they know they have someone to be the starter for 5 to 10 years and they wont know that if Glennon stays on the bench.
i love that Lovie is in Tampa but he needs to swallow his pride and call the McCown experiment over and use the season to see whats good and whats not on this Rebuilding team.
im not sure if i mentioned it in here but ive said it a lot this off season, the Hype this team was getting was scary, just because the cheifs had the big turn around last season didnt mean tampa was gonna do the same, the team was in BAD shape and though they have some nice pieces they still have a couple more seasons till they will be fully turned around
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

I hate it that they have two top tier receivers and crap for a qb.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Mecca »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:I hate it that they have two top tier receivers and crap for a qb.
:poke:
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I hate it that they have two top tier receivers and crap for a qb.
:poke:
Whatever
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Electromatic »

Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I hate it that they have two top tier receivers and crap for a qb.
:poke:

Got to cut that crap out AD.
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Mecca »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I hate it that they have two top tier receivers and crap for a qb.
:poke:
Whatever
I kinda agree with you as I was in the Glennon camp before he was even drafted. However, I don't think Evans is top tier just yet. He has the potential to be, for sure.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Ugh
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Green Habit »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Ugh
Just brutal.
Post Reply