MLB

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
MadTIGERmaN
AnalLog
Posts: 1646
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:12 am
Location: The Jungle

Re: MLB

Post by MadTIGERmaN »

The Brewers got a kid sitting at AAA whos hit some bombs this spring... who, from what they say, is "only a Left Fielder" (aka no range for CF, no arm for RF, and no glove for INF) and hes kinda blocked by Braun... would love to see the Crew trade him for some pitching help... I just dont see the Yankees coming after a "prospect" when they want to win now / need help today.
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: MLB

Post by verb_to_trust »

philpritchard wrote:I can't express how excited I am that the Yankees are on the verge of acquiring Vernon Wells.
This would have been a fantastic move.........five years ago.
Dick/Balls
User avatar
MadTIGERmaN
AnalLog
Posts: 1646
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:12 am
Location: The Jungle

Re: MLB

Post by MadTIGERmaN »

Tim McCarver says 2013 will be his last on Fox... FINALLY!
now if Joe Buck will move on as well...

thats half of what made the WBC games so fun to watch, the great announcing crews...
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10370
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: MLB

Post by liebzz »

verb_to_trust wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I can't express how excited I am that the Yankees are on the verge of acquiring Vernon Wells.
This would have been a fantastic move.........five years ago.
I know they are claiming to want to save money and build from the farm up, but every move by them this year seems to have me looking sideways. Other than resigning Rivera for another year, and taking another chance on Pettitte, I can't say I liked much of any of their moves. Letting Martin go without a suitable replacement on the horizon was dumb, letting Swisher go and then getting desperate and replacing his production with Vernon Wells is the height of terrible, signing Youkilis for so many millions when they could have just gone for...say...resigning Chavez was very strange. My guess is that they've lucked out so much the past few years on taking aging flyers on a few guys that they decided to stack their roster with them. It's gonna hurt, and bad.
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Electromatic »

Watching the Yankees this year is going to be like watching the Lawerence Welk show.
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Electromatic »

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/mlb/ne ... t=hp_t2_a8

Oh yeah, guaranteed contracts are awesome, for Johan Santana and Mike Hampton anyway.
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10370
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: MLB

Post by liebzz »

What's everyone's predictions?

AL Divisions: Rays (East), Tigers (Central), Angels (West)*
Wildcards: Blue Jays, Rangers

ALCS: Tigers over Angels

NL Divisions: Nationals (East)*, Reds (Central), Giants (West)
Wildcards: Braves, Cardinals

NLCS: Reds over Nationals

World Series: Tigers over Reds so that Jim Leyland can finally retire in peace.

* - best record in respective league.

Note: I am a Yankee fan and a relatively optimistic fan at that, and I am not expecting them to win more than say 86 wins.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: MLB

Post by @SkitchP »

So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Electromatic »

@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.

Hopefully Kate Upton.
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15498
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: MLB

Post by Chris_H_2 »

@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
A worse contract than Verlander's?
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: MLB

Post by @SkitchP »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
A worse contract than Verlander's?

You dislike the deal?
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15498
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: MLB

Post by Chris_H_2 »

@SkitchP wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
A worse contract than Verlander's?

You dislike the deal?
I'm guessing there's going to be at least $45 million per year in wasted payroll between him and Fielder in about 5 years from now.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: MLB

Post by @SkitchP »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
A worse contract than Verlander's?

You dislike the deal?
I'm guessing there's going to be at least $45 million per year in wasted payroll between him and Fielder in about 5 years from now.
You think JV will be done by 35?
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15498
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: MLB

Post by Chris_H_2 »

@SkitchP wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
A worse contract than Verlander's?

You dislike the deal?
I'm guessing there's going to be at least $45 million per year in wasted payroll between him and Fielder in about 5 years from now.
You think JV will be done by 35?
Maybe not done, but certainly not a $23 million a year pitcher. I hope I'm wrong and I eat crow, but I think his innings start catching up to him.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: MLB

Post by @SkitchP »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
A worse contract than Verlander's?

You dislike the deal?
I'm guessing there's going to be at least $45 million per year in wasted payroll between him and Fielder in about 5 years from now.
You think JV will be done by 35?
Maybe not done, but certainly not a $23 million a year pitcher. I hope I'm wrong and I eat crow, but I think his innings start catching up to him.

I hope not either, but if Detroit didn't give him this contract now, someone else would have (and then some) after 2014.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15498
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: MLB

Post by Chris_H_2 »

@SkitchP wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
A worse contract than Verlander's?

You dislike the deal?
I'm guessing there's going to be at least $45 million per year in wasted payroll between him and Fielder in about 5 years from now.
You think JV will be done by 35?
Maybe not done, but certainly not a $23 million a year pitcher. I hope I'm wrong and I eat crow, but I think his innings start catching up to him.

I hope not either, but if Detroit didn't give him this contract now, someone else would have (and then some) after 2014.
Probably. But if someone else wanted to give him a huge deal when he's 32, I still wouldn't have a problem with it. They're going to have to re-tool one of these days.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: MLB

Post by @SkitchP »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
A worse contract than Verlander's?

You dislike the deal?
I'm guessing there's going to be at least $45 million per year in wasted payroll between him and Fielder in about 5 years from now.
You think JV will be done by 35?
Maybe not done, but certainly not a $23 million a year pitcher. I hope I'm wrong and I eat crow, but I think his innings start catching up to him.

I hope not either, but if Detroit didn't give him this contract now, someone else would have (and then some) after 2014.
Probably. But if someone else wanted to give him a huge deal when he's 32, I still wouldn't have a problem with it. They're going to have to re-tool one of these days.

so basically you just want them to sign guys to nothing but one year deals?
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

You pay superstars a lot of money into their late thirties when you lock them up in long term deals. Sure, you'll be paying more than he's worth on the back end but that's how you sign guys. It's either that or you don't have an elite pitcher.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21559
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: MLB

Post by Simple Torture »

I was explaining to my fiancée how little money the Astros are spending on payroll this year and said that they are "probably the worst team in the league." She responded with, "What about the...um...the um...what are they called, the 'Red Sox'?" We both had a good chuckle.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

I think it's funny that people had a much higher opinion of last year's Red Sox team going into the season than they do this seasons'. Not that this years Red Sox team is that good, but last year's was one of the most poorly assembled teams you could put together.
Post Reply