Yes, that's exactly what I said.@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:Probably. But if someone else wanted to give him a huge deal when he's 32, I still wouldn't have a problem with it. They're going to have to re-tool one of these days.@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:Maybe not done, but certainly not a $23 million a year pitcher. I hope I'm wrong and I eat crow, but I think his innings start catching up to him.@SkitchP wrote:You think JV will be done by 35?Chris_H_2 wrote:I'm guessing there's going to be at least $45 million per year in wasted payroll between him and Fielder in about 5 years from now.@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:A worse contract than Verlander's?@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
You dislike the deal?
I hope not either, but if Detroit didn't give him this contract now, someone else would have (and then some) after 2014.
so basically you just want them to sign guys to nothing but one year deals?
MLB
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15498
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: MLB
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: MLB
Chris_H_2 wrote:Yes, that's exactly what I said.@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:Probably. But if someone else wanted to give him a huge deal when he's 32, I still wouldn't have a problem with it. They're going to have to re-tool one of these days.@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:Maybe not done, but certainly not a $23 million a year pitcher. I hope I'm wrong and I eat crow, but I think his innings start catching up to him.@SkitchP wrote:You think JV will be done by 35?Chris_H_2 wrote:I'm guessing there's going to be at least $45 million per year in wasted payroll between him and Fielder in about 5 years from now.@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:A worse contract than Verlander's?@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
You dislike the deal?
I hope not either, but if Detroit didn't give him this contract now, someone else would have (and then some) after 2014.
so basically you just want them to sign guys to nothing but one year deals?
haha. Sorry. I was making one last post from my phone before bed. CHUD basically said it right. There is no question it's a risk, but it's a risk you have to take if you want to keep top end starters at this point. If I'm going to give SP a long term deal, im glad its one that has proven to be extremely durable. If you start classifying all guys as either "injury prone" or "due for an injury" there is never going to be a good signing. And believe it or not, Im actually okay with dealing Max after the season, because it's clear you wont be able to keep him. And that's a guy you're going to be able to almost restock the farm system by dealing.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- MadTIGERmaN
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:12 am
- Location: The Jungle
Re: MLB
you guys are funny... youre complaining about keeping Verlander...
when us Brewer fans just gave Lohse the Jeff Suppan special...
when us Brewer fans just gave Lohse the Jeff Suppan special...
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51788
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21560
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: MLB
Really excited that the Sox don't have a West Coast swing early in the season (not until July) and that they don't play in Texas in April; I have no statistical evidence to back this up, but if memory serves me correctly, those things usually kill them.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: MLB
I remember opening day at 10pm in Oakland sucking if you were a fan.Simple Torture wrote:Really excited that the Sox don't have a West Coast swing early in the season (not until July) and that they don't play in Texas in April; I have no statistical evidence to back this up, but if memory serves me correctly, those things usually kill them.
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15498
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: MLB
Verlander is the best pitcher in the game. He's been the face of the franchise. He's at the top of his game. As the owner of the Tigers, you absolutely have to re-sign him. I get all of that. I don't blame the Tigers one bit for the contract. But that doesn't make it a "good" contract.@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:Yes, that's exactly what I said.@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:Probably. But if someone else wanted to give him a huge deal when he's 32, I still wouldn't have a problem with it. They're going to have to re-tool one of these days.@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:Maybe not done, but certainly not a $23 million a year pitcher. I hope I'm wrong and I eat crow, but I think his innings start catching up to him.@SkitchP wrote:You think JV will be done by 35?Chris_H_2 wrote:I'm guessing there's going to be at least $45 million per year in wasted payroll between him and Fielder in about 5 years from now.@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:A worse contract than Verlander's?@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
You dislike the deal?
I hope not either, but if Detroit didn't give him this contract now, someone else would have (and then some) after 2014.
so basically you just want them to sign guys to nothing but one year deals?
haha. Sorry. I was making one last post from my phone before bed. CHUD basically said it right. There is no question it's a risk, but it's a risk you have to take if you want to keep top end starters at this point. If I'm going to give SP a long term deal, im glad its one that has proven to be extremely durable. If you start classifying all guys as either "injury prone" or "due for an injury" there is never going to be a good signing. And believe it or not, Im actually okay with dealing Max after the season, because it's clear you wont be able to keep him. And that's a guy you're going to be able to almost restock the farm system by dealing.
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: MLB
So the Marlins had to resort to trying to sell Opening Day tickets on groupon. Tickets sold: 0.
Love it.
I also thought the other offers they were making were hilarious as well. 50% off Opening Day tickets and you get two free tickets to another game in April.
I hope nobody shows up.
Love it.
I also thought the other offers they were making were hilarious as well. 50% off Opening Day tickets and you get two free tickets to another game in April.
I hope nobody shows up.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: MLB
Looks like the Marlins had company:4/5 wrote:So the Marlins had to resort to trying to sell Opening Day tickets on groupon. Tickets sold: 0.
Love it.
I also thought the other offers they were making were hilarious as well. 50% off Opening Day tickets and you get two free tickets to another game in April.
I hope nobody shows up.

- i got bugs
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4231
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:07 pm
Re: MLB
that was prob the 8th or 9th because it wasnt outta reach til then
god this first month is gonna be unwatchable, over half the lineups basically the scranton/wilkes barre minor league team
god this first month is gonna be unwatchable, over half the lineups basically the scranton/wilkes barre minor league team
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: MLB
This MLB Now thing they have on MLB Network where Harold Reynolds and Brian Kenny argue about stuff isn't working for me. Give me the dudes sitting around watching live look ins like they have done in the past.....
Dick/Balls
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
- MadTIGERmaN
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:12 am
- Location: The Jungle
Re: MLB
pretty sure its normally going to be around 5pm? before the games start up?verb_to_trust wrote:This MLB Now thing they have on MLB Network where Harold Reynolds and Brian Kenny argue about stuff isn't working for me. Give me the dudes sitting around watching live look ins like they have done in the past.....
the live look ins are indeed WAY better... (and on a side note, there isnt many games going on at the time of the MLB Now show tonight as most the openers were already done, or, West coast / not started yet...)
How long till Ichiro wants to get traded back to Seattle? LOL
the Yankees have 93 million on the DL (ARods making more on the DL then the opening day payroll for the Astros... TEAM!)
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
It's been a long, long offseason. So excited for tomorrow night.numbers wrote:fucking stoked that baseball is back, watched like 4 games today.
-
liebzz
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10374
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: MLB
For all winning teams, there comes a time to pay the piper when your stars are agin, injured, and overpaid - and all locked in contract due to the need to feed the beast for a time. Boston had the last few years of experiencing something like that. It appears that the Yankees' turn is this year. I'm frankly shocked they made it this long given their core players should have bottomed out 3 years ago at least.