cutuphalfdead wrote:If the season ended today we'd have to have a series of play ins to decide which 2 teams get the bye.
The seedings are determined by tie-breakers unless it's for the final playoff spot. Because the Royals haven't played the Tigers yet though, we really couldn't break the current tie at the top for the byes. But it goes first by head-to-head, and then from there who has the better record against the winningest possible opponent.
I'm against this. If it's simple seeding but doesn't change how many rounds you play, use the tie breaker. But if it's a matter of byes, there should be a play in.
But if you let me know in advance you're making changes I'll wait till tomorrow afternoon to run your games, since I'm still usually posting the results around 3pm anyways. I did this with the Blue Jays that one day.
Lament wrote:But if you let me know in advance you're making changes I'll wait till tomorrow afternoon to run your games, since I'm still usually posting the results around 3pm anyways. I did this with the Blue Jays that one day.
Thanks. If it's not inconvenient, please hold off on my game then. I'm adjusting my lineup tomorrow morning. I'll post when I'm done. Thanks.
Lament wrote:But if you let me know in advance you're making changes I'll wait till tomorrow afternoon to run your games, since I'm still usually posting the results around 3pm anyways. I did this with the Blue Jays that one day.
Thanks. If it's not inconvenient, please hold off on my game then. I'm adjusting my lineup tomorrow morning. I'll post when I'm done. Thanks.
Lament wrote:But if you let me know in advance you're making changes I'll wait till tomorrow afternoon to run your games, since I'm still usually posting the results around 3pm anyways. I did this with the Blue Jays that one day.
Thanks. If it's not inconvenient, please hold off on my game then. I'm adjusting my lineup tomorrow morning. I'll post when I'm done. Thanks.
Gotcha.
Much appreciated. You are a compassionate commish. I bow too you.