Not worthy of a thread News

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
malice
post-structuralist
Posts: 4377
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm
Location: faked by jorge

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by malice »

god almighty how I despise life in 2014 :?
Dev wrote:you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
Spoiler: show
people change. people stay the same. people are so often disappointing - random PM, person unnamed
User avatar
Fuck You Jobu
AnalLog
Posts: 1531
Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
Location: Wrigleyville

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by Fuck You Jobu »

Whitey McTeeth wrote:What happens if the dog spots you spotting it?
Do I run away, or keep spotting?
Suicide by Copdog?
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22815
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by Bammer »

Strat wrote:Jennifer lawrence is incredibly naturally beautiful. God bless her. I would give anything to stuff her in my pocket, take her home with me, cuddle her and buy her presents.
What about Hope Solo?
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
Fuck You Jobu
AnalLog
Posts: 1531
Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
Location: Wrigleyville

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by Fuck You Jobu »

User avatar
Alex
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5740
Joined: Fri August 16, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by Alex »

go broncos
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by dimejinky99 »

This is a blind leap into a bucket of bullshit on an Orwellian level.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... ebook-post
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
Fuck You Jobu
AnalLog
Posts: 1531
Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
Location: Wrigleyville

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by Fuck You Jobu »

dimejinky99 wrote:This is a blind leap into a bucket of bullshit on an Orwellian level.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... ebook-post
This should prob go in the Middle East thread.
User avatar
Rangi Guy
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9473
Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by Rangi Guy »

"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
User avatar
Fuck You Jobu
AnalLog
Posts: 1531
Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
Location: Wrigleyville

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by Fuck You Jobu »

User avatar
Alex
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5740
Joined: Fri August 16, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by Alex »

dude they must have said farts like five times in that article
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by dimejinky99 »

Surely this will be put to military use first?
http://inhabitat.com/lockheed-martin-an ... ar-fusion/
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
Rangi Guy
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9473
Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by Rangi Guy »

"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
User avatar
broken iris
Future Drummer
Posts: 2868
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:24 pm
Location: Death Machine Inc's HQ

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by broken iris »

The University of Montreal has found that men who had sex with more than 20 women lower their prostate cancer risk:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/scie ... -find.html

"Honey, my PSA came back a little off... "
the sentinel remains vigilant
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37454
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by Norah »

I didn't read the study, but does it have to do with the different women, or simply that men who had sex with 20+ women have sex in general with greater frequency?
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

cutuphalfdead wrote:I didn't read the study, but does it have to do with the different women, or simply that men who had sex with 20+ women have sex in general with greater frequency?
This was my first thought too.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by McParadigm »

Did the results change if they took a breather after the first ten?
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
broken iris
Future Drummer
Posts: 2868
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:24 pm
Location: Death Machine Inc's HQ

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by broken iris »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I didn't read the study, but does it have to do with the different women, or simply that men who had sex with 20+ women have sex in general with greater frequency?
This was my first thought too.
I read the article, not the study, but my guess is that guys that who accomplish that are better looking (a sign of good health and genetics in general) and you would probably find they have lower occurrences of many diseases/cancers and it's not the amount of women you unload in that really matters.
the sentinel remains vigilant
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

broken iris wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I didn't read the study, but does it have to do with the different women, or simply that men who had sex with 20+ women have sex in general with greater frequency?
This was my first thought too.
I read the article, not the study, but my guess is that guys that who accomplish that are better looking (a sign of good health and genetics in general) and you would probably find they have lower occurrences of many diseases/cancers and it's not the amount of women you unload in that really matters.
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Besides, I've heard of other studies that indicated regular sex does lower one's risk of prostate cancer, so my guess would be the results are related.
User avatar
broken iris
Future Drummer
Posts: 2868
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:24 pm
Location: Death Machine Inc's HQ

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by broken iris »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
broken iris wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I didn't read the study, but does it have to do with the different women, or simply that men who had sex with 20+ women have sex in general with greater frequency?
This was my first thought too.
I read the article, not the study, but my guess is that guys that who accomplish that are better looking (a sign of good health and genetics in general) and you would probably find they have lower occurrences of many diseases/cancers and it's not the amount of women you unload in that really matters.
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Besides, I've heard of other studies that indicated regular sex does lower one's risk of prostate cancer, so my guess would be the results are related.
Yes, I would agree, but the question is, is 1000 encounters with one person or 100 with 10 more or equally effective?
the sentinel remains vigilant
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36754
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Post by Jorge »

Let's find out.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Post Reply