All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: RED SOX WIN IT ALL!

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by Kaius »

Musial might be close in HRs
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by Lament »

I actually think Brady Anderson might be close too.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by Kaius »

I'll find out either tonight or tomorrow when I finish updating stats.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by Kaius »

Hornsby and O'Neill should be close in BA/OBP
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by Lament »

A quick scroll tells me Brady Anderson also has six.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by @SkitchP »

Image
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by @SkitchP »

Lament wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:This is taking longer and longer to fill out
Are you surrendering the spreadsheet war?

Im out of ideas, but that BABIP was fired across CHUDs bow. So we'll have to see if he inspires me

is cobb leading with 11 steals?
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by Lament »

I have to imagine he is. Not many people are tracking them though.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by @SkitchP »

How about that 14+ Zumaya K rate
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by Lament »

@SkitchP wrote:How about that 14+ Zumaya K rate
Yeah, that's filthy.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by philpritchard »

@SkitchP wrote:
Lament wrote:
theplatypus wrote:Chud and Skitch are taking those spreadsheets way too far
I'm just waiting to see who dares to attempt to figure out each player's WAR first.

I toyed with creating an sWAR type stat.
So did I. I just added defensive stats to my spreadsheet (they have the standard PO, A and E, but they also have + and - for good and bad defensive plays, so we could make a basic defensive number), so now we have at least basic hitting, baserunning and defensive info. It would be pretty easy to make a WAR type number from there as long we use all the player stats we have available from each team to establish some "average" numbers.

This is going way beyond your standard stats/baseball nerds. I'm a little concerned.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by numbers »

philpritchard wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Lament wrote:
theplatypus wrote:Chud and Skitch are taking those spreadsheets way too far
I'm just waiting to see who dares to attempt to figure out each player's WAR first.

I toyed with creating an sWAR type stat.
So did I. I just added defensive stats to my spreadsheet (they have the standard PO, A and E, but they also have + and - for good and bad defensive plays, so we could make a basic defensive number), so now we have at least basic hitting, baserunning and defensive info. It would be pretty easy to make a WAR type number from there as long we use all the player stats we have available from each team to establish some "average" numbers.

This is going way beyond your standard stats/baseball nerds. I'm a little concerned.
Wouldnt it just be a WAR of the 6 teams or so that are tracking stats?
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by Lament »

My head is spinning.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by philpritchard »

numbers wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Lament wrote:
theplatypus wrote:Chud and Skitch are taking those spreadsheets way too far
I'm just waiting to see who dares to attempt to figure out each player's WAR first.

I toyed with creating an sWAR type stat.
So did I. I just added defensive stats to my spreadsheet (they have the standard PO, A and E, but they also have + and - for good and bad defensive plays, so we could make a basic defensive number), so now we have at least basic hitting, baserunning and defensive info. It would be pretty easy to make a WAR type number from there as long we use all the player stats we have available from each team to establish some "average" numbers.

This is going way beyond your standard stats/baseball nerds. I'm a little concerned.
Wouldnt it just be a WAR of the 6 teams or so that are tracking stats?
Pretty much, yeah... but there are more than 6, aren't there? Boston, Montreal, Toronto, Cincinnati, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Cleveland... aren't there more?
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by Lament »

philpritchard wrote:Pretty much, yeah... but there are more than 6, aren't there? Boston, Montreal, Toronto, Cincinnati, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Cleveland... aren't there more?
Chicago.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by numbers »

philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Lament wrote:
theplatypus wrote:Chud and Skitch are taking those spreadsheets way too far
I'm just waiting to see who dares to attempt to figure out each player's WAR first.

I toyed with creating an sWAR type stat.
So did I. I just added defensive stats to my spreadsheet (they have the standard PO, A and E, but they also have + and - for good and bad defensive plays, so we could make a basic defensive number), so now we have at least basic hitting, baserunning and defensive info. It would be pretty easy to make a WAR type number from there as long we use all the player stats we have available from each team to establish some "average" numbers.

This is going way beyond your standard stats/baseball nerds. I'm a little concerned.
Wouldnt it just be a WAR of the 6 teams or so that are tracking stats?
Pretty much, yeah... but there are more than 6, aren't there? Boston, Montreal, Toronto, Cincinnati, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Cleveland... aren't there more?
White Sox
Boston
Montreal
Houston
Toronto
Cincinnati
Detroit
Pittsburgh
Cleveland

I think that's it, wow we actually have almost half the teams doing this.

edit: more than half
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by philpritchard »

numbers wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Lament wrote:
theplatypus wrote:Chud and Skitch are taking those spreadsheets way too far
I'm just waiting to see who dares to attempt to figure out each player's WAR first.

I toyed with creating an sWAR type stat.
So did I. I just added defensive stats to my spreadsheet (they have the standard PO, A and E, but they also have + and - for good and bad defensive plays, so we could make a basic defensive number), so now we have at least basic hitting, baserunning and defensive info. It would be pretty easy to make a WAR type number from there as long we use all the player stats we have available from each team to establish some "average" numbers.

This is going way beyond your standard stats/baseball nerds. I'm a little concerned.
Wouldnt it just be a WAR of the 6 teams or so that are tracking stats?
Pretty much, yeah... but there are more than 6, aren't there? Boston, Montreal, Toronto, Cincinnati, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Cleveland... aren't there more?
White Sox
Boston
Montreal
Houston
Toronto
Cincinnati
Detroit
Pittsburgh
Cleveland

I think that's it, wow we actually have almost half the teams doing this.

edit: more than half
Awesome! So it would be far from perfect, but we would never expect it to be, anyway. It would just be fun to see the leader. WAR leader gets the MVP!
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by Lament »

Kaius said he's tracking the Cardinals, didn't he?
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by numbers »

philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Lament wrote:
theplatypus wrote:Chud and Skitch are taking those spreadsheets way too far
I'm just waiting to see who dares to attempt to figure out each player's WAR first.

I toyed with creating an sWAR type stat.
So did I. I just added defensive stats to my spreadsheet (they have the standard PO, A and E, but they also have + and - for good and bad defensive plays, so we could make a basic defensive number), so now we have at least basic hitting, baserunning and defensive info. It would be pretty easy to make a WAR type number from there as long we use all the player stats we have available from each team to establish some "average" numbers.

This is going way beyond your standard stats/baseball nerds. I'm a little concerned.
Wouldnt it just be a WAR of the 6 teams or so that are tracking stats?
Pretty much, yeah... but there are more than 6, aren't there? Boston, Montreal, Toronto, Cincinnati, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Cleveland... aren't there more?
White Sox
Boston
Montreal
Houston
Toronto
Cincinnati
Detroit
Pittsburgh
Cleveland

I think that's it, wow we actually have almost half the teams doing this.

edit: more than half
Awesome! So it would be far from perfect, but we would never expect it to be, anyway. It would just be fun to see the leader. WAR leader gets the MVP!
He has to be on a playoff team, though.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52025
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: All-Time Franchise Baseball Tournament: DAY NINE RESULTS

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Fine. I'll do the stats soon.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
Post Reply