Not worthy of a thread News
- malice
- post-structuralist
- Posts: 4377
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm
- Location: faked by jorge
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
god almighty how I despise life in 2014 
Dev wrote:you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
- Spoiler: show
- Fuck You Jobu
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
- Location: Wrigleyville
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
Suicide by Copdog?Whitey McTeeth wrote:What happens if the dog spots you spotting it?
Do I run away, or keep spotting?
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22815
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
What about Hope Solo?Strat wrote:Jennifer lawrence is incredibly naturally beautiful. God bless her. I would give anything to stuff her in my pocket, take her home with me, cuddle her and buy her presents.
(she/him/theirs)
- Fuck You Jobu
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
- Location: Wrigleyville
- Alex
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5740
- Joined: Fri August 16, 2013 6:36 pm
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
go broncos
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
This is a blind leap into a bucket of bullshit on an Orwellian level.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... ebook-post
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... ebook-post
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- Fuck You Jobu
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
- Location: Wrigleyville
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
This should prob go in the Middle East thread.dimejinky99 wrote:This is a blind leap into a bucket of bullshit on an Orwellian level.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... ebook-post
- Rangi Guy
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9473
- Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
- Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
- Fuck You Jobu
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
- Location: Wrigleyville
- Alex
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5740
- Joined: Fri August 16, 2013 6:36 pm
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
dude they must have said farts like five times in that article
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
Surely this will be put to military use first?
http://inhabitat.com/lockheed-martin-an ... ar-fusion/
http://inhabitat.com/lockheed-martin-an ... ar-fusion/
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- Rangi Guy
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9473
- Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
- Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
- broken iris
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2868
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:24 pm
- Location: Death Machine Inc's HQ
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
The University of Montreal has found that men who had sex with more than 20 women lower their prostate cancer risk:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/scie ... -find.html
"Honey, my PSA came back a little off... "
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/scie ... -find.html
"Honey, my PSA came back a little off... "
the sentinel remains vigilant
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37454
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
I didn't read the study, but does it have to do with the different women, or simply that men who had sex with 20+ women have sex in general with greater frequency?
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
This was my first thought too.cutuphalfdead wrote:I didn't read the study, but does it have to do with the different women, or simply that men who had sex with 20+ women have sex in general with greater frequency?
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
Did the results change if they took a breather after the first ten?
(patriotic choking noises)
- broken iris
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2868
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:24 pm
- Location: Death Machine Inc's HQ
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
I read the article, not the study, but my guess is that guys that who accomplish that are better looking (a sign of good health and genetics in general) and you would probably find they have lower occurrences of many diseases/cancers and it's not the amount of women you unload in that really matters.LoathedVermin72 wrote:This was my first thought too.cutuphalfdead wrote:I didn't read the study, but does it have to do with the different women, or simply that men who had sex with 20+ women have sex in general with greater frequency?
the sentinel remains vigilant
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Besides, I've heard of other studies that indicated regular sex does lower one's risk of prostate cancer, so my guess would be the results are related.broken iris wrote:I read the article, not the study, but my guess is that guys that who accomplish that are better looking (a sign of good health and genetics in general) and you would probably find they have lower occurrences of many diseases/cancers and it's not the amount of women you unload in that really matters.LoathedVermin72 wrote:This was my first thought too.cutuphalfdead wrote:I didn't read the study, but does it have to do with the different women, or simply that men who had sex with 20+ women have sex in general with greater frequency?
- broken iris
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2868
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:24 pm
- Location: Death Machine Inc's HQ
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
Yes, I would agree, but the question is, is 1000 encounters with one person or 100 with 10 more or equally effective?LoathedVermin72 wrote:Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Besides, I've heard of other studies that indicated regular sex does lower one's risk of prostate cancer, so my guess would be the results are related.broken iris wrote:I read the article, not the study, but my guess is that guys that who accomplish that are better looking (a sign of good health and genetics in general) and you would probably find they have lower occurrences of many diseases/cancers and it's not the amount of women you unload in that really matters.LoathedVermin72 wrote:This was my first thought too.cutuphalfdead wrote:I didn't read the study, but does it have to do with the different women, or simply that men who had sex with 20+ women have sex in general with greater frequency?
the sentinel remains vigilant
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36754
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
Let's find out.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
