Shots fired, eh?

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21559
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Shots fired, eh?

Post by Simple Torture »

Not sure if there are any RMers based in Ottawa, but stay safe, ya'll.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/22/world/ame ... ?hpt=hp_t1
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by philpritchard »

This is really scary stuff.
mf
AnalLog
Posts: 1232
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:24 pm
Contact:

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by mf »

I have a lot of family and friends there, scary stuff indeed.
User avatar
Biff Pocoroba
TIER 1 Essential Critical Infrastructure Worker
Posts: 4801
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:08 pm
Location: 5th floor, Bay 7, position 5740

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by Biff Pocoroba »

Three separate shootings?
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21559
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by Simple Torture »

Biff Pocoroba wrote:Three separate shootings?
That's what initial reports said, but based on previous experience, I wouldn't be surprised if that number comes down.
McParadigm wrote:lol
mf
AnalLog
Posts: 1232
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:24 pm
Contact:

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by mf »

Biff Pocoroba wrote:Three separate shootings?
3 locations that are all very close together - whether they are from 3 separate incidents is still unclear. From what I understand it started with a passenger getting out of a car and opening fire on a soldier at a war memorial, who then ran a short distance to the Parliament building where the original car/driver had stopped. It seems as though a suspect was gunned down by police inside Parliament. So one or more gunmen in the building? There were then later reports of gunfire at a nearby shopping centre, which is about a block from the original site where the soldier was shot.

here's raw video of the gunfire from within Parliament.

User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by philpritchard »

It sounds like there was no shooting at the Rideau Centre now, and the soldier who was shot has apparently died. Horrible, horrible news.

It looks likened an RCMP press conference will be happening soon.
User avatar
Dev
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7503
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:46 pm

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by Dev »

This is the kind of hatred Harper brings. He just pisses the world off. Russia imposed trade sanctions on us, because of his big mouth.
AMAB
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by philpritchard »

Dev wrote:This is the kind of hatred Harper brings. He just pisses the world off. Russia imposed trade sanctions on us, because of his big mouth.
So... this happened because the guy didn't like Harper?
User avatar
Alex
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5740
Joined: Fri August 16, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by Alex »

dev finally snapped
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
User avatar
Dev
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7503
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:46 pm

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by Dev »

philpritchard wrote:
Dev wrote:This is the kind of hatred Harper brings. He just pisses the world off. Russia imposed trade sanctions on us, because of his big mouth.
So... this happened because the guy didn't like Harper?
I think Harper has changed the world's opinion of Canada to an extent.
AMAB
User avatar
Rangi Guy
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9428
Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by Rangi Guy »

Dev wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
Dev wrote:This is the kind of hatred Harper brings. He just pisses the world off. Russia imposed trade sanctions on us, because of his big mouth.
So... this happened because the guy didn't like Harper?
I think Harper has changed the world's opinion of Canada to an extent.
Nope - everyone seems still like Canada buddy!
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
simple schoolboy
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by simple schoolboy »

We're both the shooter and the driver in the other incident Qubecers? Maybe it's not Harper so much but that darned Anglo cultural hegemony.
User avatar
mastaflatch
AnalLog
Posts: 1183
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:05 am

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by mastaflatch »

simple schoolboy wrote:We're both the shooter and the driver in the other incident Qubecers? Maybe it's not Harper so much but that darned Anglo cultural hegemony.
Apparently the Ottawa guy once lived in Montreal - the driver was def a quebecer but both had become ISIS afficionados so I'm quite sure it had nothing to do with the french/anglo thing.

It must be remembered that a bit more than a year ago, some dude tried to shoot the then-newly-elected Quebec prime minister (the Parti Quebecois leader Pauline Marois, who was, incidentally, the first woman to hold this position here) but ended up killing a sound tech instead. His agenda was pretty clear - he was against francophones. Of course, that was not handled as a terrorism act. Federalist news outlets prefered to called the shooter "a troubled lover of the great Canada".

Harper did change Canada's role in world affairs, turning the traditionnally humanitarian role of the army into a completely biaised and belligerent organization. I don't mean to justify this week attacks but to see this as a surprise is pretty fucking naive.
User avatar
Dev
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7503
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:46 pm

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by Dev »

mastaflatch wrote:
Harper did change Canada's role in world affairs, turning the traditionnally humanitarian role of the army into a completely biaised and belligerent organization. I don't mean to justify this week attacks but to see this as a surprise is pretty fucking naive.
thank-you
AMAB
User avatar
Stickman
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10261
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by Stickman »

One of Cpl. Cirillo's dogs waits for him to come home.
Image

Some pictures of Cpl. Nathan Cirillo's final ride on the Highway of Heroes.


Image
"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
simple schoolboy
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by simple schoolboy »

mastaflatch wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:We're both the shooter and the driver in the other incident Qubecers? Maybe it's not Harper so much but that darned Anglo cultural hegemony.
Apparently the Ottawa guy once lived in Montreal - the driver was def a quebecer but both had become ISIS afficionados so I'm quite sure it had nothing to do with the french/anglo thing.

It must be remembered that a bit more than a year ago, some dude tried to shoot the then-newly-elected Quebec prime minister (the Parti Quebecois leader Pauline Marois, who was, incidentally, the first woman to hold this position here) but ended up killing a sound tech instead. His agenda was pretty clear - he was against francophones. Of course, that was not handled as a terrorism act. Federalist news outlets prefered to called the shooter "a troubled lover of the great Canada".

Harper did change Canada's role in world affairs, turning the traditionnally humanitarian role of the army into a completely biaised and belligerent organization. I don't mean to justify this week attacks but to see this as a surprise is pretty fucking naive.
Pointing to an insane shooter to support policy changes is a failing strategy. The attempted shooter of the Quebec Prime Minister claimed that Jesus told him to do so. I'd love a follow up article, fuck, I'd love to be wrong, but I'd wager he's just nuts. And damn it, scrolling through more than three Google pages makes it obscure in my book.
User avatar
doone
Future Drummer
Posts: 3404
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:17 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: right there

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by doone »

simple schoolboy wrote:
mastaflatch wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:We're both the shooter and the driver in the other incident Qubecers? Maybe it's not Harper so much but that darned Anglo cultural hegemony.
Apparently the Ottawa guy once lived in Montreal - the driver was def a quebecer but both had become ISIS afficionados so I'm quite sure it had nothing to do with the french/anglo thing.

It must be remembered that a bit more than a year ago, some dude tried to shoot the then-newly-elected Quebec prime minister (the Parti Quebecois leader Pauline Marois, who was, incidentally, the first woman to hold this position here) but ended up killing a sound tech instead. His agenda was pretty clear - he was against francophones. Of course, that was not handled as a terrorism act. Federalist news outlets prefered to called the shooter "a troubled lover of the great Canada".

Harper did change Canada's role in world affairs, turning the traditionnally humanitarian role of the army into a completely biaised and belligerent organization. I don't mean to justify this week attacks but to see this as a surprise is pretty fucking naive.
Pointing to an insane shooter to support policy changes is a failing strategy. The attempted shooter of the Quebec Prime Minister claimed that Jesus told him to do so. I'd love a follow up article, fuck, I'd love to be wrong, but I'd wager he's just nuts. And damn it, scrolling through more than three Google pages makes it obscure in my book.
I'm not sure what is being argued here but Quebec doesn't have it's own Prime Minister, it has a Premier, like all the other provinces. I have not heard if they've discovered a motive for the Ottawa guy other than psychological.
bada wrote:Cause the two girls on the board voted for the rapey song.
User avatar
mastaflatch
AnalLog
Posts: 1183
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:05 am

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by mastaflatch »

doone wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:
mastaflatch wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:We're both the shooter and the driver in the other incident Qubecers? Maybe it's not Harper so much but that darned Anglo cultural hegemony.
Apparently the Ottawa guy once lived in Montreal - the driver was def a quebecer but both had become ISIS afficionados so I'm quite sure it had nothing to do with the french/anglo thing.

It must be remembered that a bit more than a year ago, some dude tried to shoot the then-newly-elected Quebec prime minister (the Parti Quebecois leader Pauline Marois, who was, incidentally, the first woman to hold this position here) but ended up killing a sound tech instead. His agenda was pretty clear - he was against francophones. Of course, that was not handled as a terrorism act. Federalist news outlets prefered to called the shooter "a troubled lover of the great Canada".

Harper did change Canada's role in world affairs, turning the traditionnally humanitarian role of the army into a completely biaised and belligerent organization. I don't mean to justify this week attacks but to see this as a surprise is pretty fucking naive.
Pointing to an insane shooter to support policy changes is a failing strategy. The attempted shooter of the Quebec Prime Minister claimed that Jesus told him to do so. I'd love a follow up article, fuck, I'd love to be wrong, but I'd wager he's just nuts. And damn it, scrolling through more than three Google pages makes it obscure in my book.
I'm not sure what is being argued here but Quebec doesn't have it's own Prime Minister, it has a Premier, like all the other provinces. I have not heard if they've discovered a motive for the Ottawa guy other than psychological.
In french, they're called prime ministers. as in provincial prime ministers.

I think that the three of them are religion motivated nutjobs but then, I think that most killers are somewhat nuts. The troubling details in these are the targets, hence the political recuperation that happens (or didn't in the case of Marois). You shouldn't be considered nuts if Jesus told you to do it but a terrorist if Allah did.
User avatar
doone
Future Drummer
Posts: 3404
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:17 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: right there

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Post by doone »

mastaflatch wrote:
doone wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:
mastaflatch wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:We're both the shooter and the driver in the other incident Qubecers? Maybe it's not Harper so much but that darned Anglo cultural hegemony.
Apparently the Ottawa guy once lived in Montreal - the driver was def a quebecer but both had become ISIS afficionados so I'm quite sure it had nothing to do with the french/anglo thing.

It must be remembered that a bit more than a year ago, some dude tried to shoot the then-newly-elected Quebec prime minister (the Parti Quebecois leader Pauline Marois, who was, incidentally, the first woman to hold this position here) but ended up killing a sound tech instead. His agenda was pretty clear - he was against francophones. Of course, that was not handled as a terrorism act. Federalist news outlets prefered to called the shooter "a troubled lover of the great Canada".

Harper did change Canada's role in world affairs, turning the traditionnally humanitarian role of the army into a completely biaised and belligerent organization. I don't mean to justify this week attacks but to see this as a surprise is pretty fucking naive.
Pointing to an insane shooter to support policy changes is a failing strategy. The attempted shooter of the Quebec Prime Minister claimed that Jesus told him to do so. I'd love a follow up article, fuck, I'd love to be wrong, but I'd wager he's just nuts. And damn it, scrolling through more than three Google pages makes it obscure in my book.
I'm not sure what is being argued here but Quebec doesn't have it's own Prime Minister, it has a Premier, like all the other provinces. I have not heard if they've discovered a motive for the Ottawa guy other than psychological.
In french, they're called prime ministers. as in provincial prime ministers.
.
Really? huh. So what do they call the actual Prime Minister?
bada wrote:Cause the two girls on the board voted for the rapey song.
Post Reply