Birds in Hell wrote:Stone's tone has been great on the last few tours after being pretty weak around 2003-3006.
What... what year is it
Birds in Hell wrote:Stone's tone has been great on the last few tours after being pretty weak around 2003-3006.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Will they put a little fixin' on it? I think they'll watch it go to fire before that happens.Birds in Hell wrote:Hang tight, guys. Pearl Jam finally start turning things around when they're replaced by clones of their 1998 selves in 2046.
No, its not.... But nice find!Strat wrote:is this from the show?
bodysnatcher wrote:Someone ban KurtLeon please
bodysnatcher wrote:Someone ban KurtLeon please
Those look and sound really good.KurtLeon wrote:Actually, some dude that works for Multishow just posted 3 videos of him recording the record(?). And yes, the show WILL be broadcasted on saturday, and Ed explained why it was cut out.
Aparently, the band though that Multishow was an opened-air chanel, not a paid cabled one, so when they did found this out, they demanded to cut the broadcast, but the show WAS recorded.
Anyway, here is the videos:
Do The Evolution:
Olé!:
Jeremy:
Have you considered stacking papers and getting paid?David Yow wrote:How are Pearl Jam any different from Toto?
I think it was the wording, I take it that SNC is right: they were OK with free-to-air broadcasting, not okay with some kind of PPV or cable situation.cutuphalfdead wrote:It sounded like they thought it was going to be on broadcast tv, objected, and then said ok to cable.
That would make a lot more sense.Birds in Hell wrote:I think it was the wording, I take it that SNC is right: they were OK with free-to-air broadcasting, not okay with some kind of PPV or cable situation.cutuphalfdead wrote:It sounded like they thought it was going to be on broadcast tv, objected, and then said ok to cable.
indeedcutuphalfdead wrote:That would make a lot more sense.Birds in Hell wrote:I think it was the wording, I take it that SNC is right: they were OK with free-to-air broadcasting, not okay with some kind of PPV or cable situation.cutuphalfdead wrote:It sounded like they thought it was going to be on broadcast tv, objected, and then said ok to cable.
Yes, it is another part of the "Pearl Jam Sport Event" where the crowd tries to have a maximal impact on the song length and on what Ed is doing on stage.Birds in Hell wrote:Returning to masta's point from the other thread: man oh man, that new crowd participation chant in DTE is terrible.
It's HORRIBLE, and I think it was born from the first 2005 Buenos Aires show. When the crowd spontaneously erupted into chants during Stone's guitar part it was kind of cool. Now it's ham-handed "COME ON, SING ALONG WITH US, COME ON! OHH-OHH-OHH!". It's lame.Birds in Hell wrote:Returning to masta's point from the other thread: man oh man, that new crowd participation chant in DTE is terrible.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
so we can blame SA on this, thankstheplatypus wrote:It's HORRIBLE, and I think it was born from the first 2005 Buenos Aires show. When the crowd spontaneously erupted into chants during Stone's guitar part it was kind of cool. Now it's ham-handed "COME ON, SING ALONG WITH US, COME ON! OHH-OHH-OHH!". It's lame.Birds in Hell wrote:Returning to masta's point from the other thread: man oh man, that new crowd participation chant in DTE is terrible.