UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
- ridleybradout
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2551
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:33 pm
- Location: Rand McNally
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
Stone is both the coolest and uncoolest guy in the band.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
Boom brings something to the band, and Crazy Mary has been better since he joined.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84845
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
This is the Unpopular Pearl Jam Opinions thread not the Totally Fucking Duh thread.ridleybradout wrote:Stone is both the coolest and uncoolest guy in the band.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36487
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
I like the idea of Boom, but when there's a part with a slight degree of intricacy (which is to say every other keyboard part aside from the keyboard-smashing free-for-all solo in "Crazy Mary"), he can't do it. He's a klutz, a remarkably unskilled player for someone who does it at a professional level. He's ruined so many songs.numbers wrote:Boom brings something to the band, and Crazy Mary has been better since he joined.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84845
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
Strat wrote:Sires is fucking great
Dave A is overrated and kind of obnoxious on most songs (yet totally awesome on others)
Matt Cameron is an incredible song writer and the best in the band.

- bodysnatcher
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22220
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
- Location: the bathroom
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
I'd rather go to a show and get 16 really well-played, intense songs... instead of a 3 hour 32-song marathon of half-baked singalongs
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16263
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
bodysnatcher wrote:I'd rather go to a show and get 16 really well-played, intense songs... instead of a 3 hour 32-song marathon of half-baked singalongs
On that note, my submission is that Pearl Jam shows are way too long.
Even for a band I love, somewhere in the region of 90-120 minutes (at most) is the longest I really want to hear them play live. More ≠ better.
I think the band's set length was ideal in 1998 and 2000.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
There are definitely songs he has massacred(RITFW comes to mind,) but I like that he's in the band so they can do things like Crazy Mary.theplatypus wrote:I like the idea of Boom, but when there's a part with a slight degree of intricacy (which is to say every other keyboard part aside from the keyboard-smashing free-for-all solo in "Crazy Mary"), he can't do it. He's a klutz, a remarkably unskilled player for someone who does it at a professional level. He's ruined so many songs.numbers wrote:Boom brings something to the band, and Crazy Mary has been better since he joined.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
Crazy Mary was at it's best before it turned into a Boom/McCready wank fest.
- Mine
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
cutuphalfdead wrote:Pearl Jam was at it's best before it turned into a wank fest.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
DISAGREEcutuphalfdead wrote:Crazy Mary was at it's best before it turned into a Boom/McCready wank fest.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
2000 Crazy Mary or GTFOnumbers wrote:DISAGREEcutuphalfdead wrote:Crazy Mary was at it's best before it turned into a Boom/McCready wank fest.
- Rangi Guy
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9428
- Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
- Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
cutuphalfdead wrote:Crazy Mary was at it's best before it turned into a Boom/McCready wank fest.
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
2003 Crazy Mary makes 2000 Crazy Mary look like a little bitch.cutuphalfdead wrote:2000 Crazy Mary or GTFOnumbers wrote:DISAGREEcutuphalfdead wrote:Crazy Mary was at it's best before it turned into a Boom/McCready wank fest.
- bodysnatcher
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22220
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
- Location: the bathroom
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
Crazy Mary was at its best when it had only been played 3-4 times ever
- EJ
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7053
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
cutuphalfdead wrote:2000 Crazy Mary or GTFOnumbers wrote:DISAGREEcutuphalfdead wrote:Crazy Mary was at it's best before it turned into a Boom/McCready wank fest.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
Birds in Hell wrote:bodysnatcher wrote:I'd rather go to a show and get 16 really well-played, intense songs... instead of a 3 hour 32-song marathon of half-baked singalongs![]()
On that note, my submission is that Pearl Jam shows are way too long.
Even for a band I love, somewhere in the region of 90-120 minutes (at most) is the longest I really want to hear them play live. More ≠ better.
I think the band's set length was ideal in 1998 and 2000.
I didn't want the denver show to end. Nothing was half baked. All the songs were played wonderfully. Out of their minds. Pearl jam, musically As a band, is not as bad as RM makes them out to be.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16263
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
Don't misunderstand me, Strat: I really love Pearl Jam.Strat wrote:Birds in Hell wrote:bodysnatcher wrote:I'd rather go to a show and get 16 really well-played, intense songs... instead of a 3 hour 32-song marathon of half-baked singalongs![]()
On that note, my submission is that Pearl Jam shows are way too long.
Even for a band I love, somewhere in the region of 90-120 minutes (at most) is the longest I really want to hear them play live. More ≠ better.
I think the band's set length was ideal in 1998 and 2000.
I didn't want the denver show to end. Nothing was half baked. All the songs were played wonderfully. Out of their minds. Pearl jam, musically As a band, is not as bad as RM makes them out to be.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
It was more of a general comment but I quoted you.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16263
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
Strat wrote:It was more of a general comment but I quoted you.