Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Books, movies, television...
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

Didn’t get too many responses for the first post, so I thought I’d try something more recent to see if it might be more accessible.

To be clear, 2000s refers to 2000-2009.

1. The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou
2. Lost in Translation
3. Bronson
4. There Will Be Blood
5. Punch-Drunk Love
6. The Devil’s Rejects
7. The Lord of the Rings Trilogy
8. The Room
9. Broken Flowers
10. Ocean’s Eleven
11. A History of Violence
12. Innocence

Honorable Mention: The Matador
Last edited by LoathedVermin72 on Fri November 21, 2014 5:25 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Alex
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5740
Joined: Fri August 16, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by Alex »

i'm gonna avoid this thread for a few days, and then read the whole thing like it's christmas morning. i can't wait.
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Technically a decade starts with the year "1". So 2001 would be the first year of the decade and 2010 the last. Look it up.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Technically the LOTR trilogy is three movies so you have to take two off your list. Look it up.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by Kaius »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Technically a decade starts with the year "1". So 2001 would be the first year of the decade and 2010 the last. Look it up.
That's really stupid.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Kaius wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Technically a decade starts with the year "1". So 2001 would be the first year of the decade and 2010 the last. Look it up.
That's really stupid.
Not if you think about it. A decade = ten years. our "A.D." years didn't begin at zero, they began at year one. therefore, ten years would have been years 1 - 10, so on and so forth...
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by Kaius »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Kaius wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Technically a decade starts with the year "1". So 2001 would be the first year of the decade and 2010 the last. Look it up.
That's really stupid.
Not if you think about it. A decade = ten years. our "A.D." years didn't begin at zero, they began at year one. therefore, ten years would have been years 1 - 10, so on and so forth...
Ok, so I have an irrational hatred for it.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

Ruddo don't make me come over there
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by McParadigm »

Are we going by production time? We should.

If a movie was written, developed, and filmed during the 1998-2000 period, but was released in 2001, is it really fair to allow that to be considered one of the best films of the 2001-2010 era?

And wait...what if the production time straddles the cutoff?

I think we need to elect a governance committee before we try to decide anything further.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

Really, in the scope of the crushing indifference of the universe, the human construct of labeling time is so meaningless that we should probably abandon this thread altogether.

Amirite?
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by McParadigm »

We used to look up at the sky and wonder at our place in the stars.

Then we got jobs.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

It's a small exhaust port, right below the main port.
User avatar
ABNorman
The Beef
Posts: 4475
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:16 pm

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by ABNorman »

Spoiler: show
Image
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by Norah »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Kaius wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Technically a decade starts with the year "1". So 2001 would be the first year of the decade and 2010 the last. Look it up.
That's really stupid.
Not if you think about it. A decade = ten years. our "A.D." years didn't begin at zero, they began at year one. therefore, ten years would have been years 1 - 10, so on and so forth...
Yup, just like we weren't ringing in a new millennium on new year's eve 1999.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by @SkitchP »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Kaius wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Technically a decade starts with the year "1". So 2001 would be the first year of the decade and 2010 the last. Look it up.
That's really stupid.
Not if you think about it. A decade = ten years. our "A.D." years didn't begin at zero, they began at year one. therefore, ten years would have been years 1 - 10, so on and so forth...
Yup, just like we weren't ringing in a new millennium on new year's eve 1999.

We ring a new millennium every minute of our being Chud, some just choose to set arbitrary end points.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Kaius wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Technically a decade starts with the year "1". So 2001 would be the first year of the decade and 2010 the last. Look it up.
That's really stupid.
Not if you think about it. A decade = ten years. our "A.D." years didn't begin at zero, they began at year one. therefore, ten years would have been years 1 - 10, so on and so forth...
Yup, just like we weren't ringing in a new millennium on new year's eve 1999.
I knew you would have my back on this, Pete.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by Jorge »

Wow, is this stupid argument really back
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by Jorge »

Did I somehow get transported back in time to the late nineties?
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Alex
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5740
Joined: Fri August 16, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by Alex »

theplatypus wrote:Did I somehow get transported back in time to the late nineties?
you're on a pearl jam message board, so yeah, kind of
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

theplatypus wrote:Wow, is this stupid argument really back
Hey Jorge
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
Post Reply