Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33839
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Didn’t get too many responses for the first post, so I thought I’d try something more recent to see if it might be more accessible.
To be clear, 2000s refers to 2000-2009.
1. The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou
2. Lost in Translation
3. Bronson
4. There Will Be Blood
5. Punch-Drunk Love
6. The Devil’s Rejects
7. The Lord of the Rings Trilogy
8. The Room
9. Broken Flowers
10. Ocean’s Eleven
11. A History of Violence
12. Innocence
Honorable Mention: The Matador
To be clear, 2000s refers to 2000-2009.
1. The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou
2. Lost in Translation
3. Bronson
4. There Will Be Blood
5. Punch-Drunk Love
6. The Devil’s Rejects
7. The Lord of the Rings Trilogy
8. The Room
9. Broken Flowers
10. Ocean’s Eleven
11. A History of Violence
12. Innocence
Honorable Mention: The Matador
Last edited by LoathedVermin72 on Fri November 21, 2014 5:25 am, edited 2 times in total.
- Alex
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5740
- Joined: Fri August 16, 2013 6:36 pm
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
i'm gonna avoid this thread for a few days, and then read the whole thing like it's christmas morning. i can't wait.
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
Technically a decade starts with the year "1". So 2001 would be the first year of the decade and 2010 the last. Look it up.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
Technically the LOTR trilogy is three movies so you have to take two off your list. Look it up.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
That's really stupid.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Technically a decade starts with the year "1". So 2001 would be the first year of the decade and 2010 the last. Look it up.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
Not if you think about it. A decade = ten years. our "A.D." years didn't begin at zero, they began at year one. therefore, ten years would have been years 1 - 10, so on and so forth...Kaius wrote:That's really stupid.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Technically a decade starts with the year "1". So 2001 would be the first year of the decade and 2010 the last. Look it up.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
Ok, so I have an irrational hatred for it.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Not if you think about it. A decade = ten years. our "A.D." years didn't begin at zero, they began at year one. therefore, ten years would have been years 1 - 10, so on and so forth...Kaius wrote:That's really stupid.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Technically a decade starts with the year "1". So 2001 would be the first year of the decade and 2010 the last. Look it up.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33839
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
Ruddo don't make me come over there
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
Are we going by production time? We should.
If a movie was written, developed, and filmed during the 1998-2000 period, but was released in 2001, is it really fair to allow that to be considered one of the best films of the 2001-2010 era?
And wait...what if the production time straddles the cutoff?
I think we need to elect a governance committee before we try to decide anything further.
If a movie was written, developed, and filmed during the 1998-2000 period, but was released in 2001, is it really fair to allow that to be considered one of the best films of the 2001-2010 era?
And wait...what if the production time straddles the cutoff?
I think we need to elect a governance committee before we try to decide anything further.
(patriotic choking noises)
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33839
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
Really, in the scope of the crushing indifference of the universe, the human construct of labeling time is so meaningless that we should probably abandon this thread altogether.
Amirite?
Amirite?
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
We used to look up at the sky and wonder at our place in the stars.
Then we got jobs.
Then we got jobs.
(patriotic choking noises)
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33839
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
It's a small exhaust port, right below the main port.
- ABNorman
- The Beef
- Posts: 4475
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:16 pm
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
Yup, just like we weren't ringing in a new millennium on new year's eve 1999.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Not if you think about it. A decade = ten years. our "A.D." years didn't begin at zero, they began at year one. therefore, ten years would have been years 1 - 10, so on and so forth...Kaius wrote:That's really stupid.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Technically a decade starts with the year "1". So 2001 would be the first year of the decade and 2010 the last. Look it up.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
cutuphalfdead wrote:Yup, just like we weren't ringing in a new millennium on new year's eve 1999.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Not if you think about it. A decade = ten years. our "A.D." years didn't begin at zero, they began at year one. therefore, ten years would have been years 1 - 10, so on and so forth...Kaius wrote:That's really stupid.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Technically a decade starts with the year "1". So 2001 would be the first year of the decade and 2010 the last. Look it up.
We ring a new millennium every minute of our being Chud, some just choose to set arbitrary end points.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
I knew you would have my back on this, Pete.cutuphalfdead wrote:Yup, just like we weren't ringing in a new millennium on new year's eve 1999.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Not if you think about it. A decade = ten years. our "A.D." years didn't begin at zero, they began at year one. therefore, ten years would have been years 1 - 10, so on and so forth...Kaius wrote:That's really stupid.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Technically a decade starts with the year "1". So 2001 would be the first year of the decade and 2010 the last. Look it up.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
Wow, is this stupid argument really back
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
Did I somehow get transported back in time to the late nineties?
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- Alex
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5740
- Joined: Fri August 16, 2013 6:36 pm
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
you're on a pearl jam message board, so yeah, kind oftheplatypus wrote:Did I somehow get transported back in time to the late nineties?
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
Hey Jorgetheplatypus wrote:Wow, is this stupid argument really back
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
