Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Books, movies, television...
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
EJ wrote:Gladiator

The Two Towers (if only allowed to pick one of the trilogy)
Yeah LV needs to fix that on his list.
I can't separate them. They are one equal entity in my mind. I can't watch one without the others.
Then you don't have a true top ten, therefore your list is invalid. Do the right thing, LV
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33835
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
EJ wrote:Gladiator

The Two Towers (if only allowed to pick one of the trilogy)
Yeah LV needs to fix that on his list.
I can't separate them. They are one equal entity in my mind. I can't watch one without the others.
Then you don't have a true top ten, therefore your list is invalid. Do the right thing, LV
Image
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

I just made things right
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by bada »

I don't know. The LOTR Trilogy is three seperate movies. Kill Bill 1 & 2 is one movie split apart by a nervous studio.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33835
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

You guys can say whatever you want, but it will not change my mind.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:You guys can say whatever you want, but it will not change my mind.
Like I said, it is ok. I fixed things.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33835
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:You guys can say whatever you want, but it will not change my mind.
Like I said, it is ok. I fixed things.
Image
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33835
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

:o
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by epilogue »

durdencommatyler wrote:1. Mulholland Drive
2. Dancer in the Dark
3. Memento
4. Talk to Her
5. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
6. Children of Men
6. Donnie Darko
7. No Country for Old Men
8. The Fountain
10. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
11. High Fidelity
12. Storytelling

Honorable Mentions:

(13) American Psycho
(14) Before Sunset
(15) 25th Hour
(16) Adaptation
(17) Zodiac
Thanks, Ruddo! I get to put High Fidelity into the list proper thanks to your wizardry.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33835
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

I will not change remod's remodding
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:I will not change remod's remodding
You brought this on yourself
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33835
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I will not change remod's remodding
You brought this on yourself
Image
User avatar
LetMeSleep
Posting (live)
Posts: 17987
Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Scooby Doo

Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by LetMeSleep »

Of course you can. the third was just lots of fucking walking and weeping. Boring as shit.
User avatar
ABNorman
The Beef
Posts: 4475
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:16 pm

Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by ABNorman »

LetMeSleep wrote:Of course you can. the third was just lots of fucking walking and weeping. Boring as shit.
MY FRIENDS. YOU BOW FOR NO MAN.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by epilogue »

They are separate movies. Made at different times. As separate movies. One is Great. One is pretty damn good. One is junk. Then they went and made three MORE movies. They are separate and it's not only easy, but necessary to differentiate between them. Separate them. And like them all differently, for fuck's sake.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33835
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

durdencommatyler wrote:They are separate movies. Made at different times. As separate movies. One is Great. One is pretty damn good. One is junk. Then they went and made three MORE movies. They are separate and it's not only easy, but necessary to differentiate between them. Separate them. And like them all differently, for fuck's sake.
Actually, they were kind of all made at once. And I love them all equally.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:They are separate movies. Made at different times. As separate movies. One is Great. One is pretty damn good. One is junk. Then they went and made three MORE movies. They are separate and it's not only easy, but necessary to differentiate between them. Separate them. And like them all differently, for fuck's sake.
Actually, they were kind of all made at once. And I love them all equally.
Actually "kinda" means not really. And you shouldn't because they aren't equal.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33835
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:They are separate movies. Made at different times. As separate movies. One is Great. One is pretty damn good. One is junk. Then they went and made three MORE movies. They are separate and it's not only easy, but necessary to differentiate between them. Separate them. And like them all differently, for fuck's sake.
Actually, they were kind of all made at once. And I love them all equally.
Actually "kinda" means not really. And you shouldn't because they aren't equal.
:|
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:They are separate movies. Made at different times. As separate movies. One is Great. One is pretty damn good. One is junk. Then they went and made three MORE movies. They are separate and it's not only easy, but necessary to differentiate between them. Separate them. And like them all differently, for fuck's sake.
Actually, they were kind of all made at once. And I love them all equally.
Actually "kinda" means not really. And you shouldn't because they aren't equal.
:|
:ohyeah!:
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33835
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:They are separate movies. Made at different times. As separate movies. One is Great. One is pretty damn good. One is junk. Then they went and made three MORE movies. They are separate and it's not only easy, but necessary to differentiate between them. Separate them. And like them all differently, for fuck's sake.
Actually, they were kind of all made at once. And I love them all equally.
Actually "kinda" means not really. And you shouldn't because they aren't equal.
:|
:ohyeah!:
:facepalm:
Post Reply