Then you don't have a true top ten, therefore your list is invalid. Do the right thing, LVLoathedVermin72 wrote:I can't separate them. They are one equal entity in my mind. I can't watch one without the others.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yeah LV needs to fix that on his list.EJ wrote:Gladiator
The Two Towers (if only allowed to pick one of the trilogy)
Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33836
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Then you don't have a true top ten, therefore your list is invalid. Do the right thing, LVLoathedVermin72 wrote:I can't separate them. They are one equal entity in my mind. I can't watch one without the others.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yeah LV needs to fix that on his list.EJ wrote:Gladiator
The Two Towers (if only allowed to pick one of the trilogy)

- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
I just made things right
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
I don't know. The LOTR Trilogy is three seperate movies. Kill Bill 1 & 2 is one movie split apart by a nervous studio.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33836
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
You guys can say whatever you want, but it will not change my mind.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Like I said, it is ok. I fixed things.LoathedVermin72 wrote:You guys can say whatever you want, but it will not change my mind.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33836
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Like I said, it is ok. I fixed things.LoathedVermin72 wrote:You guys can say whatever you want, but it will not change my mind.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33836
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
Thanks, Ruddo! I get to put High Fidelity into the list proper thanks to your wizardry.durdencommatyler wrote:1. Mulholland Drive
2. Dancer in the Dark
3. Memento
4. Talk to Her
5. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
6. Children of Men
6. Donnie Darko
7. No Country for Old Men
8. The Fountain
10. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
11. High Fidelity
12. Storytelling
Honorable Mentions:
(13) American Psycho
(14) Before Sunset
(15) 25th Hour
(16) Adaptation
(17) Zodiac
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33836
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
I will not change remod's remodding
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
You brought this on yourselfLoathedVermin72 wrote:I will not change remod's remodding
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33836
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
E.H. Ruddock wrote:You brought this on yourselfLoathedVermin72 wrote:I will not change remod's remodding

- LetMeSleep
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 17987
- Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Scooby Doo
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Of course you can. the third was just lots of fucking walking and weeping. Boring as shit.
- ABNorman
- The Beef
- Posts: 4475
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:16 pm
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
MY FRIENDS. YOU BOW FOR NO MAN.LetMeSleep wrote:Of course you can. the third was just lots of fucking walking and weeping. Boring as shit.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
They are separate movies. Made at different times. As separate movies. One is Great. One is pretty damn good. One is junk. Then they went and made three MORE movies. They are separate and it's not only easy, but necessary to differentiate between them. Separate them. And like them all differently, for fuck's sake.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33836
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Actually, they were kind of all made at once. And I love them all equally.durdencommatyler wrote:They are separate movies. Made at different times. As separate movies. One is Great. One is pretty damn good. One is junk. Then they went and made three MORE movies. They are separate and it's not only easy, but necessary to differentiate between them. Separate them. And like them all differently, for fuck's sake.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Actually "kinda" means not really. And you shouldn't because they aren't equal.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Actually, they were kind of all made at once. And I love them all equally.durdencommatyler wrote:They are separate movies. Made at different times. As separate movies. One is Great. One is pretty damn good. One is junk. Then they went and made three MORE movies. They are separate and it's not only easy, but necessary to differentiate between them. Separate them. And like them all differently, for fuck's sake.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33836
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
durdencommatyler wrote:Actually "kinda" means not really. And you shouldn't because they aren't equal.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Actually, they were kind of all made at once. And I love them all equally.durdencommatyler wrote:They are separate movies. Made at different times. As separate movies. One is Great. One is pretty damn good. One is junk. Then they went and made three MORE movies. They are separate and it's not only easy, but necessary to differentiate between them. Separate them. And like them all differently, for fuck's sake.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
LoathedVermin72 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:Actually "kinda" means not really. And you shouldn't because they aren't equal.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Actually, they were kind of all made at once. And I love them all equally.durdencommatyler wrote:They are separate movies. Made at different times. As separate movies. One is Great. One is pretty damn good. One is junk. Then they went and made three MORE movies. They are separate and it's not only easy, but necessary to differentiate between them. Separate them. And like them all differently, for fuck's sake.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33836
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
durdencommatyler wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:Actually "kinda" means not really. And you shouldn't because they aren't equal.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Actually, they were kind of all made at once. And I love them all equally.durdencommatyler wrote:They are separate movies. Made at different times. As separate movies. One is Great. One is pretty damn good. One is junk. Then they went and made three MORE movies. They are separate and it's not only easy, but necessary to differentiate between them. Separate them. And like them all differently, for fuck's sake.