MLB
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
It's a bit of a weird one. Maybe they're looking at it as part of the rebuild, hoping they can trade him for prospects at some point.
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
I've come around a bit on the Heyward trade, too. If Miller can bounce back a bit, four years of a solid pitcher isn't awful value.
- BigRedLedbetter
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 5401
- Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
- Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska
Re: MLB
5 YEARS/$95 MILLION offer for Panda? Yikes. I'm sure the Red Sockers no likey.
LaRoche is a good pickup for Lament's boys. Very underrated and I wish the Rangers would have signed him.
LaRoche is a good pickup for Lament's boys. Very underrated and I wish the Rangers would have signed him.
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37460
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: MLB
When I was coming down last night I saw the news on my phone. I couldn't make sense of it either but brushed it off as being in a state that wasn't conducive to any sort of critical thought. But today I can't figure it out either.Lament wrote:I can't figure out why the White Sox signed Adam LaRoche.
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
That seems like a really good contract for Ramirez. But... I mean... why? Where the hell are they planning on playing him? Are the looking to trade Bogaerts or something?
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
Ah, nevermind... looks like the report that Sandoval has signed was a bit premature. Ramirez makes sense if they still have the opening at 3B.
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
That probably makes the most sense, but I think what would have made even more sense would be to only sign one of the 3B and keep Cespedes in LF without having to commit nearly $20 million per year for the next five years.numbers wrote:I think they move Hanley to LF and trade Cespedes.
I'm sure it sounds strange given how much I like the Martin deal for Toronto, but I viewed that as a huge upgrade, while this seems like a very expensive, minor upgrade at a position where they didn't really have a need.
Cespedes and Ramirez both had 3.4 fWAR last year (Ramirez did it in fewer games, but staying healthy is a valuable attribute). Ramirez is two years older, has missed about 180 games due to injuries the last four years, hasn't played a single inning in the outfield in his 13 year professional career and now has to learn it in one of the most difficult left fields in baseball.
He's a very good player and I would expect him to put up huge offensive numbers in Fenway, but unless they get a huge return on one of their outfielders, I don't get how signing both of the big-name 3B makes sense.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37460
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: MLB
These signings are baffling to me. Way too much risk. Pablo will be ok for a couple years maybe, and Hanley is only worth it if he plays, which is a big maybe.
What baffles me the most is that they're willing to give more than 20 mil a year to a 30 year old, oft injured Hanley Ramirez but haven't exceeded more than 20 mil per year in an offer for Lester.
What baffles me the most is that they're willing to give more than 20 mil a year to a 30 year old, oft injured Hanley Ramirez but haven't exceeded more than 20 mil per year in an offer for Lester.
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
Does he hate the wall or something? He's played 80% of his career innings in LF.cutuphalfdead wrote:Cespedes is being a bitch about playing LF.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37460
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: MLB
I don't know the full story, but the whispers are that he's being a stickler over which position he plays in the OF.philpritchard wrote:Does he hate the wall or something? He's played 80% of his career innings in LF.cutuphalfdead wrote:Cespedes is being a bitch about playing LF.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: MLB
They wanted him to move to RF when they got him, and he refused. That's all I know.cutuphalfdead wrote:I don't know the full story, but the whispers are that he's being a stickler over which position he plays in the OF.philpritchard wrote:Does he hate the wall or something? He's played 80% of his career innings in LF.cutuphalfdead wrote:Cespedes is being a bitch about playing LF.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37460
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: MLB
Maybe that was it. Either way, he's being a bitch about which side he plays and Hanley says he'll play anywhere on the field.numbers wrote:They wanted him to move to RF when they got him, and he refused. That's all I know.cutuphalfdead wrote:I don't know the full story, but the whispers are that he's being a stickler over which position he plays in the OF.philpritchard wrote:Does he hate the wall or something? He's played 80% of his career innings in LF.cutuphalfdead wrote:Cespedes is being a bitch about playing LF.
Full disclosure: I still don't like this Hanley deal.
- EJ
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7053
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm
Re: MLB
Very good point about Lester.cutuphalfdead wrote:These signings are baffling to me. Way too much risk. Pablo will be ok for a couple years maybe, and Hanley is only worth it if he plays, which is a big maybe.
What baffles me the most is that they're willing to give more than 20 mil a year to a 30 year old, oft injured Hanley Ramirez but haven't exceeded more than 20 mil per year in an offer for Lester.