The Green Bay Packers

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35446
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by spike »

holy shit, guys
User avatar
Orpheus
Future Drummer
Posts: 2874
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 8:08 pm

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Orpheus »

Can we just all cut the shit and finally admit Rodgers is most likely the best QB ever? Blah blah Brady Manning counting stats clutch blah blah. He basically owns all the efficiency records and is unlikely to lose them. There's just no one else to me.
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Lament »

He really is unlike anyone else ever. His "bad" year as a starter was his very first one, 2008, when he posted a QB rating of 93.8. That'd be a career year for 99% of quarterbacks.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35446
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by spike »

Orpheus wrote:Can we just all cut the shit and finally admit Rodgers is most likely the best QB ever? Blah blah Brady Manning counting stats clutch blah blah. He basically owns all the efficiency records and is unlikely to lose them. There's just no one else to me.
:nice:
User avatar
Alex
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5740
Joined: Fri August 16, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Alex »

the pack is back
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Lament »

So apparently as of September 25th, 2011, the Packers have the largest cumulative margin of victory in NFL history, taking that title away from the Bears (who held it for virtually the entirety of NFL history up to that point). Appropriately enough, they moved into first by beating the Bears at Soldier Field.

Image

There's an interactive version of the chart in the article, which is pretty cool. Helps put into perspective the ups and downs each franchise has experienced.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/ske ... f-the-nfl/
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Green Habit »

Very cool graph, but I'm sure Steelers fans will agree with me that we should start that graph at the merger. :( They still haven't passed the Browns in this metric, and similar to Packers/Bears the Broncos finally passed the Raiders at what looks like last year.
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Lament »

So who is ready for the hype machine to go into full gear for next Sunday's game?
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Lament »

Image
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
Self
Polluted
Posts: 4644
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
Location: PM me, I have everything.

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Self »

Image

Image
User avatar
Orpheus
Future Drummer
Posts: 2874
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 8:08 pm

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Orpheus »

Yeah, no kidding. I also love how people are just now noticing Nelson is really good. He's been torching people for long TDs for the last 4-5 years. He caught their first TD in their SB win (on a 30+ yard go route no less), he's just white and didn't get as many targets as Jennings/Finley/Jones. Sometimes I wonder if people in the media even watch the fucking game they cover.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Green Habit »

Orpheus wrote:Yeah, no kidding. I also love how people are just now noticing Nelson is really good. He's been torching people for long TDs for the last 4-5 years. He caught their first TD in their SB win (on a 30+ yard go route no less), he's just white and didn't get as many targets as Jennings/Finley/Jones. Sometimes I wonder if people in the media even watch the fucking game they cover.
He probably singlehandedly made Josh Freeman a first round QB when they were at K-State.
User avatar
Orpheus
Future Drummer
Posts: 2874
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 8:08 pm

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Orpheus »

Green Habit wrote:
Orpheus wrote:Yeah, no kidding. I also love how people are just now noticing Nelson is really good. He's been torching people for long TDs for the last 4-5 years. He caught their first TD in their SB win (on a 30+ yard go route no less), he's just white and didn't get as many targets as Jennings/Finley/Jones. Sometimes I wonder if people in the media even watch the fucking game they cover.
He probably singlehandedly made Josh Freeman a first round QB when they were at K-State.
I sat through a miserable UT game in a torrential downpour where he killed us. And I believe this was when Texas still had Thomas and a few other future NFL guys in their secondary.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35446
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by spike »

Is there any chance the GB v NE game gets moved to Sunday night? I'll be flying back from LA and'll miss all the afternoon action.
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Lament »

No, Fox protected GB-NE (and GB-PHI) from flex scheduling.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Coach »

spike wrote:
Orpheus wrote:Can we just all cut the shit and finally admit Rodgers is most likely the best QB ever? Blah blah Brady Manning counting stats clutch blah blah. He basically owns all the efficiency records and is unlikely to lose them. There's just no one else to me.
:nice:
Couple points on this:

* It's a bit early to put Rodgers ahead of Montana, Brady, Manning, but let's see where his career nets out, as I agree, I think it's possible that he lands on top of this whole thing in the end. He turns only 31 in a few days, so there's plenty of time for him to match in terms of stats, winning, etc.

* As a Pats fan devastated by the loss to Green Bay in the '96 SB, I'd love to see them get another crack at these guys in Feb. Still, NE's recent track record for correcting losses in SBs is not very good and a Brady loss to Rodgers in a SB would help support your argument.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by @SkitchP »

lets go pats.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35446
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by spike »

@SkitchP wrote:lets go pats.
Haven't lost hope yet, huh?
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by @SkitchP »

spike wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:lets go pats.
Haven't lost hope yet, huh?

I lost hope 20 years ago spike.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Lament »

Image
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
Post Reply