I was leaning towards B. When B happens, I really wish they'd just include the single track soundboard recording but be up front about why it sounds different.Birds in Hell wrote:I never actually listened to that but I believe it was broadcast with the rest of the show.cutuphalfdead wrote:Is it on the lossy leak that was captured from the radio stream?
I can only surmise that either: a. Ten Club's current explanation is bullshit or b. the earlier broadcast was of a direct soundboard tape whereas this release has been newly-mixed from the multitrack (which didn't catch Dead Man).cutuphalfdead wrote:That was a soundboard, right?
Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37328
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16264
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
Yeah, that seems like the obvious solution to me, but I guess in that case I should start my own band and my own fanclub, etc.cutuphalfdead wrote:I was leaning towards B. When B happens, I really wish they'd just include the single track soundboard recording but be up front about why it sounds different.Birds in Hell wrote:I never actually listened to that but I believe it was broadcast with the rest of the show.cutuphalfdead wrote:Is it on the lossy leak that was captured from the radio stream?
I can only surmise that either: a. Ten Club's current explanation is bullshit or b. the earlier broadcast was of a direct soundboard tape whereas this release has been newly-mixed from the multitrack (which didn't catch Dead Man).cutuphalfdead wrote:That was a soundboard, right?
- bodysnatcher
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22220
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
- Location: the bathroom
Re: Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
guys, all i know is that when i used to transfer my mix tapes that i recorded off the radio to compact disc, if one of the songs had a DJ talking over the end, i fucking kept it on there... i wanted songs with all the warts.
- Wendy Carlos's Twin
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2809
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am
Re: Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
How is it possible that all of the shows starting in 2000 were completely recorded by two machines, except for this one show? Smells like bullshit to me.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37328
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
Wasn't there a show where they didn't have a multi-track recording of a song or two but still included the soundboard single track anyway?Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:How is it possible that all of the shows starting in 2000 were completely recorded by two machines, except for this one show? Smells like bullshit to me.
- Wendy Carlos's Twin
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2809
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am
Re: Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
Tampa 2000 - tape machine took a shit during Last Exit.cutuphalfdead wrote:Wasn't there a show where they didn't have a multi-track recording of a song or two but still included the soundboard single track anyway?Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:How is it possible that all of the shows starting in 2000 were completely recorded by two machines, except for this one show? Smells like bullshit to me.
And they didn't even insert the song back into the normal setlist. They stuck it at the end of disc two like it would be some huge distraction or something.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37328
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
Hey, even that's better than not including it at all.Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:Tampa 2000 - tape machine took a shit during Last Exit.cutuphalfdead wrote:Wasn't there a show where they didn't have a multi-track recording of a song or two but still included the soundboard single track anyway?Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:How is it possible that all of the shows starting in 2000 were completely recorded by two machines, except for this one show? Smells like bullshit to me.
And they didn't even insert the song back into the normal setlist. They stuck it at the end of disc two like it would be some huge distraction or something.
- given2fly23
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Sun January 13, 2013 7:00 pm
Re: Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
I just compared the broadcast version to the audience recording and Dead Man on the broadcast version is indeed incomplete. It's there until the "hallways are all mocking me" and then his vocals cut out.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16264
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
Well, in that case, I kind of understand (giving them the benefit of the doubt that they don't have a board tape of that show stashed away somewhere).
You'd think it would cause them less grief to make it clear upfront that a song is missing, however.
You'd think it would cause them less grief to make it clear upfront that a song is missing, however.
- ridleybradout
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2551
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:33 pm
- Location: Rand McNally
Re: Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
Exactly. Instead they've now got a '*Track listing may vary from original set list' disclaimer on every setlist pageBirds in Hell wrote: You'd think it would cause them less grief to make it clear upfront that a song is missing, however.
Same thing happened to the first 5 songs of E. Rutherford II in 2006 (GREAT show btw) - except that time they put it on a completely separate disc. A while back I edited it so the cut into Animal transitions smoothly out of the mixing console version. Happy to upload if there's any interest in it...Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:Tampa 2000 - tape machine took a shit during Last Exit.cutuphalfdead wrote:Wasn't there a show where they didn't have a multi-track recording of a song or two but still included the soundboard single track anyway?Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:How is it possible that all of the shows starting in 2000 were completely recorded by two machines, except for this one show? Smells like bullshit to me.
And they didn't even insert the song back into the normal setlist. They stuck it at the end of disc two like it would be some huge distraction or something.


- bodysnatcher
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22220
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
- Location: the bathroom
Re: Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
They should have kept the part of Dead Man they had, then when it went out, splice it with a modern day version of PJ performing it live in studioBirds in Hell wrote:Well, in that case, I kind of understand (giving them the benefit of the doubt that they don't have a board tape of that show stashed away somewhere).
You'd think it would cause them less grief to make it clear upfront that a song is missing, however.
Just for shits and giggles
- given2fly23
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Sun January 13, 2013 7:00 pm
Re: Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
The audience recording is killer, so hopefully some kind soul here will workout a patch.
Would love to see them release a show that is uncirculated someday. Novel though, I know.
Would love to see them release a show that is uncirculated someday. Novel though, I know.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37328
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
Push Me Pull Me from Constitution Hall was incomplete but they used what they had.
- Lament
- Commissioner
- Posts: 11792
- Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am
Re: Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
I want the next vault release to be advertised as Solider Field, but in reality be 2015 Pearl Jam playing the exact same setlist (with Ed recreating all of the in between song banter) live in their home studio with crowd noise from The Who Live at Leeds dubbed in. And I want Boom to be front and center in the mix.bodysnatcher wrote:They should have kept the part of Dead Man they had, then when it went out, splice it with a modern day version of PJ performing it live in studio
Just for shits and giggles
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
- bodysnatcher
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22220
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
- Location: the bathroom
Re: Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
This is next level Foxymophandlemama shitLament wrote:I want the next vault release to be advertised as Solider Field, but in reality be 2015 Pearl Jam playing the exact same setlist (with Ed recreating all of the in between song banter) live in their home studio with crowd noise from The Who Live at Leeds dubbed in. And I want Boom to be front and center in the mix.bodysnatcher wrote:They should have kept the part of Dead Man they had, then when it went out, splice it with a modern day version of PJ performing it live in studio
Just for shits and giggles
- kreng
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1160
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 10:53 pm
Re: Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
haha wtf, why does this band insist on releasing the stuff that's incomplete. the Ten boxset live album, constitution hall and now this one. not to mention the fuckery with unplugged.cutuphalfdead wrote:Push Me Pull Me from Constitution Hall was incomplete but they used what they had.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
- hlniv
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 3098
- Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
- Location: Louisville, KY
- CopperTom
- Champion of RM
- Posts: 10760
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Re: Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
Just face it, there are few complete recorded shows sitting in the vault.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
- bodysnatcher
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22220
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
- Location: the bathroom
Re: Vault #4: Bellingham 5/10/2000
it really is strange, considering this band is known for their live show, and has released hundreds of live complete bootlegs
