You're PROBABLY right. But I DO hate his Trek movies more than any of the prequels.B wrote:This is why I trust JJ Abrams. Purists may not like his Star Treks, but no one bitches about the dialog. It will never seem as fake and shoehorned as the prequels. It can't sink the franchise any further. Episode 7 can ONLY improve this mess.
Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
No. They bitch about the use of tragically lazy plotting.B wrote:This is why I trust JJ Abrams. Purists may not like his Star Treks, but no one bitches about the dialog.
"Let's put this bitch at top speed. Twenty minutes later, we'll dump you on a planet which is apparently right next door to and closer than the moon from the planet we just left. So expect it to take us 243 years to reach earth. Also, you'll be within a quarter mile of hideaway-Spock, so that's pretty sweet. Oh, and like a mile at most away from Scotty. Who will have invented the most impactful and convenient travel system ever. Which we will never use or refer to again. This is in no way completely retarded."
And then the magic Tribble blood, which we will probably never use or refer to again. And the way plot is rushed by in hurried summary exposition, like a video game cut scene hurrying to get to the next level of mission play. And...
Look, the one thing I can credit Abrams with is that he's a good actor's director. He gets performances great enough that the stories he tells aren't worthy of them. That's already a step up from the prequels.
(patriotic choking noises)
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
No. YOU bitch about the use of tragically lazy plotting.McParadigm wrote:No. They bitch about the use of tragically lazy plotting.B wrote:This is why I trust JJ Abrams. Purists may not like his Star Treks, but no one bitches about the dialog.
And, McPhriend, love ya, but we fucking get it already. I promise. We do. But just because one beaten horse deserves another. JJ. Didn't. Write. Those. Scripts.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
I think you typed it wrong.LoathedVermin72 wrote:You're PROBABLY right. But I DO hate his Trek movies more than any of the prequels.B wrote:This is why I trust JJ Abrams. Purists may not like his Star Treks, but no one bitches about the dialog. It will never seem as fake and shoehorned as the prequels. It can't sink the franchise any further. Episode 7 can ONLY improve this mess.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
Nor did he push hard for a rewrite, or change his writing team, or do anything whatsoever to soften the stupidity of those moments. I'd say it's safe to assume he thought it was all okay.durdencommatyler wrote:JJ. Didn't. Write. Those. Scripts.
All his work has that kind of derp to it. Sort of like in Super 8, when the soldiers can't make the guns or tanks stop shooting up the town, but apparently they keep reloading them because it never stops?
I did a pretty good job of staying away last week. It's only when I get bored that I look for things to do on the Red Mosquito, and there's not a lot going on here right now.but we fucking get it already. I promise. We do.
(patriotic choking noises)
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
I'm glad you're back. I always miss you when you're gone. And I mean that will all sincerity and zero irony.McParadigm wrote:Nor did he push hard for a rewrite, or change his writing team, or do anything whatsoever to soften the stupidity of those moments. I'd say it's safe to assume he thought it was all okay.durdencommatyler wrote:JJ. Didn't. Write. Those. Scripts.
All his work has that kind of derp to it. Sort of like in Super 8, when the soldiers can't make the guns or tanks stop shooting up the town, but apparently they keep reloading them because it never stops?
I did a pretty good job of staying away last week. It's only when I get bored that I look for things to do on the Red Mosquito, and there's not a lot going on here right now.but we fucking get it already. I promise. We do.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
durdencommatyler wrote:I'm glad you're back. I always miss you when you're gone. And I mean that will all sincerity and zero irony.

(patriotic choking noises)
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35420
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
DcT, you should thro won A new Hope. Your love will return faster than the next Mcp anti abrams comment.
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 25049
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
I don't think I watched the Star Trek reboot closely enough.McParadigm wrote:No. They bitch about the use of tragically lazy plotting.B wrote:This is why I trust JJ Abrams. Purists may not like his Star Treks, but no one bitches about the dialog.
"Let's put this bitch at top speed. Twenty minutes later, we'll dump you on a planet which is apparently right next door to and closer than the moon from the planet we just left. So expect it to take us 243 years to reach earth. Also, you'll be within a quarter mile of hideaway-Spock, so that's pretty sweet. Oh, and like a mile at most away from Scotty. Who will have invented the most impactful and convenient travel system ever. Which we will never use or refer to again. This is in no way completely retarded."
And then the magic Tribble blood, which we will probably never use or refer to again. And the way plot is rushed by in hurried summary exposition, like a video game cut scene hurrying to get to the next level of mission play. And...
Look, the one thing I can credit Abrams with is that he's a good actor's director. He gets performances great enough that the stories he tells aren't worthy of them. That's already a step up from the prequels.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
That's a great idea! I'm going to do just that. But not tonight. Tonight I have to build some furniture.Strat wrote:DcT, you should thro won A new Hope. Your love will return faster than the next Mcp anti abrams comment.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
I think you did. You're fine.B wrote:I don't think I watched the Star Trek reboot closely enough.McParadigm wrote:No. They bitch about the use of tragically lazy plotting.B wrote:This is why I trust JJ Abrams. Purists may not like his Star Treks, but no one bitches about the dialog.
"Let's put this bitch at top speed. Twenty minutes later, we'll dump you on a planet which is apparently right next door to and closer than the moon from the planet we just left. So expect it to take us 243 years to reach earth. Also, you'll be within a quarter mile of hideaway-Spock, so that's pretty sweet. Oh, and like a mile at most away from Scotty. Who will have invented the most impactful and convenient travel system ever. Which we will never use or refer to again. This is in no way completely retarded."
And then the magic Tribble blood, which we will probably never use or refer to again. And the way plot is rushed by in hurried summary exposition, like a video game cut scene hurrying to get to the next level of mission play. And...
Look, the one thing I can credit Abrams with is that he's a good actor's director. He gets performances great enough that the stories he tells aren't worthy of them. That's already a step up from the prequels.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
You'll always be my Thunder Eagle.McParadigm wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:I'm glad you're back. I always miss you when you're gone. And I mean that will all sincerity and zero irony.
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 25049
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
Search your feelings. You know that's not true.LoathedVermin72 wrote:You're PROBABLY right. But I DO hate his Trek movies more than any of the prequels.B wrote:This is why I trust JJ Abrams. Purists may not like his Star Treks, but no one bitches about the dialog. It will never seem as fake and shoehorned as the prequels. It can't sink the franchise any further. Episode 7 can ONLY improve this mess.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
Oh I know it's true. I despise those movies. II and III are bad, but not on the same level. And I like Episode I.B wrote:Search your feelings. You know that's not true.LoathedVermin72 wrote:You're PROBABLY right. But I DO hate his Trek movies more than any of the prequels.B wrote:This is why I trust JJ Abrams. Purists may not like his Star Treks, but no one bitches about the dialog. It will never seem as fake and shoehorned as the prequels. It can't sink the franchise any further. Episode 7 can ONLY improve this mess.
But, as you referenced in your original post, I'm something of a Trek "purist," if that's how you want to phrase it. Or...phase it.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
I think he believes it. But that doesn't mean it's true.B wrote:Search your feelings. You know that's not true.LoathedVermin72 wrote:You're PROBABLY right. But I DO hate his Trek movies more than any of the prequels.B wrote:This is why I trust JJ Abrams. Purists may not like his Star Treks, but no one bitches about the dialog. It will never seem as fake and shoehorned as the prequels. It can't sink the franchise any further. Episode 7 can ONLY improve this mess.
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 25049
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
I am going to go ahead and ban you until January 2016.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I like Episode I.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
B wrote:I am going to go ahead and ban you until January 2016.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I like Episode I.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
LoathedVermin72 wrote:B wrote:I am going to go ahead and ban you until January 2016.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I like Episode I.

- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
Jar-Jar is probably one of my favorite SW characters
- Alex
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5740
- Joined: Fri August 16, 2013 6:36 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)
ehaoiehoaiheaiehoiaheoiaheoiaheihoaheaio
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.