The Green Bay Packers

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Lament »

Absolutely terrible loss.

If they win the next two weeks they'll still get a #2 seed at 12-4. Arizona and Seattle both have the tie-breaker over them, so #1 is pretty much out of the question. If Seattle wins against Arizona next week, everyone has to go through them again, and the Packers will be able to point to today's embarrassing performances by the offense and special teams as the reason why. I can't see this team winning on the road against Seattle.

This could end up being every bit as big of a squandered opportunity as when they blew chances to get byes with bad road losses late in 2012 and 2002.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by verb_to_trust »

Olivia Munn's fault. Clearly.
Dick/Balls
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35446
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by spike »

Lament wrote:Absolutely terrible loss.

If they win the next two weeks they'll still get a #2 seed at 12-4. Arizona and Seattle both have the tie-breaker over them, so #1 is pretty much out of the question. If Seattle wins against Arizona next week, everyone has to go through them again, and the Packers will be able to point to today's embarrassing performances by the offense and special teams as the reason why. I can't see this team winning on the road against Seattle.

This could end up being every bit as big of a squandered opportunity as when they blew chances to get byes with bad road losses late in 2012 and 2002.
RELAX
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Lament »

Do you really think this team's chances to get the Super Bowl aren't dramatically changed by having to go on the road versus being at home?
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35446
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by spike »

Of course I do; I want no part of Seattle.
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Lament »

Well, losing today dramatically increases the odds of them having to go through Seattle if they want to get to the Super Bowl. That makes it a pretty big loss in my eyes. Without home field, they're no longer the favorite (at least to me).

Here's hoping Arizona can beat Seattle next week. Having to go to Arizona is waaaay less intimidating than going to Seattle.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35446
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by spike »

hey lament, i hope this makes you feel a little better:
The team Arizona doesn’t want to see have the same record? That’s Green Bay, which could win out and claim the top seed even after losing to the Bills on Sunday. If the Packers finished tied with the Cardinals at 12-4, they would win the tiebreaker by virtue of their superior record against common opponents. The Cardinals would then finish second, retaining a first-round bye in the process.
So, ideally, the Packers want to see the Seahawks beat the Cardinals and the Rams prevail over Seattle in Week 17. If the Packers get those two results and win out, they’ll finish with the top seed. They would beat the Cowboys in a tiebreaker by virtue of their superior record in conference games, and if the Cardinals make it to 12-4, Green Bay will pip them to the top spot because of a better record against common opponents.
http://grantland.com/the-triangle/the-n ... -playoffs/
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Lament »

I suppose it does. I can't see Seattle losing at home to St. Louis though, so I still want Arizona to win this weekend. I'm ok with Arizona being the #1 seed. I'm pretty comfortable with Rodgers squaring off against a 3rd or 4th string quarterback in a dome if it comes down to that.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6985
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by 4/5 »

Lament wrote:I suppose it does. I can't see Seattle losing at home to St. Louis though, so I still want Arizona to win this weekend. I'm ok with Arizona being the #1 seed. I'm pretty comfortable with Rodgers squaring off against a 3rd or 4th string quarterback in a dome if it comes down to that.
I doubt Arizona wins a playoff game this season, regardless of who they play. Dallas, Philly, GB, Detroit, Seattle would all be favored @ Arizona.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

nyquillyn
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by nyquillyn »

4/5 wrote:
Lament wrote:I suppose it does. I can't see Seattle losing at home to St. Louis though, so I still want Arizona to win this weekend. I'm ok with Arizona being the #1 seed. I'm pretty comfortable with Rodgers squaring off against a 3rd or 4th string quarterback in a dome if it comes down to that.
I doubt Arizona wins a playoff game this season, regardless of who they play. Dallas, Philly, GB, Detroit, Seattle would all be favored @ Arizona.
With a third-string QB, I won't fight you too much. One thing I will say, is that defense plays out of its fucking mind at home and it could be enough to carry them if they get a home playoff game. Peterson shut down both Dez and Megatron once this year already.
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Lament »

turned2black wrote:With a third-string QB, I won't fight you too much. One thing I will say, is that defense plays out of its fucking mind at home and it could be enough to carry them if they get a home playoff game. Peterson shut down both Dez and Megatron once this year already.
I don't doubt that the defense would put up a great fight. But there's a good chance the outcome of that game would come down to one of the two quarterbacks having to make a few big plays in big spots. I'm not saying the Packers would blow them out, but I am comfortable in Rodgers being able to make the plays he'll need to make, and not comfortable in thinking whoever is under center for the Cardinals will be able to.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by @SkitchP »

It feels counter intuitive, but in some respects wouldn't the Packers benefit from playing in places like seattle or detroit or arizona as opposed to home? A pass heavy offense, with significant defensive concerns?

A bad weather game against any of those 3 defenses feels like it could be something to be concerned about.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Lament »

I would say that in a bad weather game the Packers passing game is better equipped to deal with the weather than anyone else's due to the familiarity with those conditions, and Eddie Lacy is a strong enough runner to make sure they get adequate chances to take shots downfield.

Isn't Seattle just as likely as anywhere to have shitty weather? Rain has to be worse for the passing game than cold (or snow).

But yeah, Arizona and Detroit being dome teams makes them seem less intimidating opponents on the road. Rodgers' numbers in domes in the playoffs are obscene (vs. Arizona in 09/10 and vs. Atlanta and Pittsburgh in 10/11)
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15498
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Chris_H_2 »

Well, that and the fact that Aaron Rodgers hasn't thrown an interception at home since 2012.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35446
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by spike »

:(
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Lament »

Four straight NFC North titles and eight in the thirteen years the division has existed.

The NFC North's nickname should be changed from "The Black & Blue Division" to "The Green & Gold Division" until someone else strings together a few first place finishes.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Lament »

Special shout out to the Chicago Bears for bringing up the rear with a solid 5-11 finish.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by EJ »

Lament wrote:Special shout out to the Chicago Bears for bringing up the rear with a solid 5-11 finish.
Shanahan will fix Cutler just like he did in Denver. Right? Right?

:?
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Green Habit »

EJ wrote:
Lament wrote:Special shout out to the Chicago Bears for bringing up the rear with a solid 5-11 finish.
Shanahan will fix Cutler just like he did in Denver. Right? Right?

:?
I'd be far more confident of him fixing Cutler than I would of him fixing the defense.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: The Green Bay Packers

Post by Kaius »

Lament wrote:Special shout out to the Chicago Bears for bringing up the rear with a solid 5-11 finish.
:(
Post Reply