I have no problem with leaving Rose out. His crimes are much more important than his hits.Electromatic wrote:The voting process is probably the worst part of the hall of fame. They almost need a group of curators for that job.
The journalist aspect of the whole thing is just sort of nonsensical.
In 140 years to only have 215 players enshrined is a pretty good number to me it's pretty difficult to have any sort of perfect system.
I just find it a little ridiculous that the all time hits leader isn't in the nations museum of baseball even with all his lies and comical behavior.
They could have a whole wing dedicated to miscreants, cheating and nefarious behavior.
One day I'm bringing my kid, we're going to talk baseball and we will discuss honorable behavior and the lack thereof.
I'm just not sure a lot of guys in the steroid era, even if they have numbers are really hall of famers. Bonds and Clemens are...I really don't feel like Mcgwire or Sosa belong. Good players, not Hall of Famers.
Will he be a Hall of Famer?
- Fuck You Jobu
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
- Location: Wrigleyville
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
Also, Mike Mussina and Curt Schilling are both better than John Smoltz.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
Agreed, I really don't like when guys don't get votes because people assume they juiced even if there isn't a shred of proof.philpritchard wrote:McGwire and Sosa are close enough to borderline candidates that I can understand not voting for them. There's just no justification for leaving Bagwell off, regardless of the era he played in.Electromatic wrote:The voting process is probably the worst part of the hall of fame. They almost need a group of curators for that job.
The journalist aspect of the whole thing is just sort of nonsensical.
In 140 years to only have 215 players enshrined is a pretty good number to me it's pretty difficult to have any sort of perfect system.
I just find it a little ridiculous that the all time hits leader isn't in the nations museum of baseball even with all his lies and comical behavior.
They could have a whole wing dedicated to miscreants, cheating and nefarious behavior.
One day I'm bringing my kid, we're going to talk baseball and we will discuss honorable behavior and the lack thereof.
I'm just not sure a lot of guys in the steroid era, even if they have numbers are really hall of famers. Bonds and Clemens are...I really don't feel like Mcgwire or Sosa belong. Good players, not Hall of Famers.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
I disagree with the "small hall" view.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
If Bagwell is in then Sheffield is in. Balco link be damned.numbers wrote:Agreed, I really don't like when guys don't get votes because people assume they juiced even if there isn't a shred of proof.philpritchard wrote:McGwire and Sosa are close enough to borderline candidates that I can understand not voting for them. There's just no justification for leaving Bagwell off, regardless of the era he played in.Electromatic wrote:The voting process is probably the worst part of the hall of fame. They almost need a group of curators for that job.
The journalist aspect of the whole thing is just sort of nonsensical.
In 140 years to only have 215 players enshrined is a pretty good number to me it's pretty difficult to have any sort of perfect system.
I just find it a little ridiculous that the all time hits leader isn't in the nations museum of baseball even with all his lies and comical behavior.
They could have a whole wing dedicated to miscreants, cheating and nefarious behavior.
One day I'm bringing my kid, we're going to talk baseball and we will discuss honorable behavior and the lack thereof.
I'm just not sure a lot of guys in the steroid era, even if they have numbers are really hall of famers. Bonds and Clemens are...I really don't feel like Mcgwire or Sosa belong. Good players, not Hall of Famers.
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
I think Sheffield probably should be in, but Bagwell is an absolute no-brainer.cutuphalfdead wrote:If Bagwell is in then Sheffield is in. Balco link be damned.numbers wrote:Agreed, I really don't like when guys don't get votes because people assume they juiced even if there isn't a shred of proof.philpritchard wrote:McGwire and Sosa are close enough to borderline candidates that I can understand not voting for them. There's just no justification for leaving Bagwell off, regardless of the era he played in.Electromatic wrote:The voting process is probably the worst part of the hall of fame. They almost need a group of curators for that job.
The journalist aspect of the whole thing is just sort of nonsensical.
In 140 years to only have 215 players enshrined is a pretty good number to me it's pretty difficult to have any sort of perfect system.
I just find it a little ridiculous that the all time hits leader isn't in the nations museum of baseball even with all his lies and comical behavior.
They could have a whole wing dedicated to miscreants, cheating and nefarious behavior.
One day I'm bringing my kid, we're going to talk baseball and we will discuss honorable behavior and the lack thereof.
I'm just not sure a lot of guys in the steroid era, even if they have numbers are really hall of famers. Bonds and Clemens are...I really don't feel like Mcgwire or Sosa belong. Good players, not Hall of Famers.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
Skitch's Tigers Twitter Community absolutely sold me on Trammell and I now think it's an outrage how low his totals are.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
numbers wrote:Skitch's Tigers Twitter Community absolutely sold me on Trammell and I now think it's an outrage how low his totals are.
and honestly, most of the national guys are more outraged about Whitaker.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
When you compare Trammell to comparable SS's that are already in, it's a no brainer.@SkitchP wrote:numbers wrote:Skitch's Tigers Twitter Community absolutely sold me on Trammell and I now think it's an outrage how low his totals are.
and honestly, most of the national guys are more outraged about Whitaker.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
numbers wrote:When you compare Trammell to comparable SS's that are already in, it's a no brainer.@SkitchP wrote:numbers wrote:Skitch's Tigers Twitter Community absolutely sold me on Trammell and I now think it's an outrage how low his totals are.
and honestly, most of the national guys are more outraged about Whitaker.
Same with Whitaker!
http://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/jaws_2B.shtml
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- BigRedLedbetter
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 5401
- Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
- Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
Trammell should def be in.
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
I'm not sold on Trammell.
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
Boomer Esiason during one of those "cbs sports radio minutes" made a pretty compelling case for Don Mattingly, which now has me second guessing his status. I guess he's out for good now unless the Veterans Committee steps up.
Trammel was HUGE when I was a kid. Don't know enough about his stats/intangibles, but in the kids baseball card trading world, we all coveted his cards.
Trammel was HUGE when I was a kid. Don't know enough about his stats/intangibles, but in the kids baseball card trading world, we all coveted his cards.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
cutuphalfdead wrote:I'm not sold on Trammell.
We shouldn't talk about the Hall of Fame because it makes me hate people I otherwise love.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
I can't possibly imagine someone putting together a reasonable case for Mattingly because he's so far away from being a legitimate Hall of Famer, but I would be interested in hearing the argument.Coach wrote:Boomer Esiason during one of those "cbs sports radio minutes" made a pretty compelling case for Don Mattingly, which now has me second guessing his status. I guess he's out for good now unless the Veterans Committee steps up.
Trammel was HUGE when I was a kid. Don't know enough about his stats/intangibles, but in the kids baseball card trading world, we all coveted his cards.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
philpritchard wrote:I can't possibly imagine someone putting together a reasonable case for Mattingly because he's so far away from being a legitimate Hall of Famer, but I would be interested in hearing the argument.Coach wrote:Boomer Esiason during one of those "cbs sports radio minutes" made a pretty compelling case for Don Mattingly, which now has me second guessing his status. I guess he's out for good now unless the Veterans Committee steps up.
Trammel was HUGE when I was a kid. Don't know enough about his stats/intangibles, but in the kids baseball card trading world, we all coveted his cards.
It worked for Jim Rice.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
Rice was a much better candidate than Mattingly, though. He still shouldn't be in, but he was a lot closer.@SkitchP wrote:philpritchard wrote:I can't possibly imagine someone putting together a reasonable case for Mattingly because he's so far away from being a legitimate Hall of Famer, but I would be interested in hearing the argument.Coach wrote:Boomer Esiason during one of those "cbs sports radio minutes" made a pretty compelling case for Don Mattingly, which now has me second guessing his status. I guess he's out for good now unless the Veterans Committee steps up.
Trammel was HUGE when I was a kid. Don't know enough about his stats/intangibles, but in the kids baseball card trading world, we all coveted his cards.
It worked for Jim Rice.
- Fuck You Jobu
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
- Location: Wrigleyville
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
What was his argument?Coach wrote:Boomer Esiason during one of those "cbs sports radio minutes" made a pretty compelling case for Don Mattingly, which now has me second guessing his status. I guess he's out for good now unless the Veterans Committee steps up.
Trammel was HUGE when I was a kid. Don't know enough about his stats/intangibles, but in the kids baseball card trading world, we all coveted his cards.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
Rice got in as some kind of anti-PED vote. I don't know that he has that much better of a case than Mattingly, maybe a little bit but not a lot.philpritchard wrote:Rice was a much better candidate than Mattingly, though. He still shouldn't be in, but he was a lot closer.@SkitchP wrote:philpritchard wrote:I can't possibly imagine someone putting together a reasonable case for Mattingly because he's so far away from being a legitimate Hall of Famer, but I would be interested in hearing the argument.Coach wrote:Boomer Esiason during one of those "cbs sports radio minutes" made a pretty compelling case for Don Mattingly, which now has me second guessing his status. I guess he's out for good now unless the Veterans Committee steps up.
Trammel was HUGE when I was a kid. Don't know enough about his stats/intangibles, but in the kids baseball card trading world, we all coveted his cards.
It worked for Jim Rice.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
I'm with Phil on this one.philpritchard wrote:I can't possibly imagine someone putting together a reasonable case for Mattingly because he's so far away from being a legitimate Hall of Famer, but I would be interested in hearing the argument.Coach wrote:Boomer Esiason during one of those "cbs sports radio minutes" made a pretty compelling case for Don Mattingly, which now has me second guessing his status. I guess he's out for good now unless the Veterans Committee steps up.
Trammel was HUGE when I was a kid. Don't know enough about his stats/intangibles, but in the kids baseball card trading world, we all coveted his cards.