NHL Thread
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: NHL Thread
The fact that you guys have posted in here means you're in for the tournament, right?
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: NHL Thread
philpritchard wrote:The fact that you guys have posted in here means you're in for the tournament, right?
Spreadsheet look good to go?
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: NHL Thread
Absolutely!@SkitchP wrote:philpritchard wrote:The fact that you guys have posted in here means you're in for the tournament, right?
Spreadsheet look good to go?
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: NHL Thread
philpritchard wrote:Absolutely!@SkitchP wrote:philpritchard wrote:The fact that you guys have posted in here means you're in for the tournament, right?
Spreadsheet look good to go?
yay!
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: NHL Thread
If we end up with ten teams, we can probably do up to a 72 game schedule (play everyone eight times). With 12 teams, we would probably do 66 (play everyone six times).
The other option is that we try a different set up with two conferences/divisions and figure out a schedule from there.
I don't know. Thoughts?
The other option is that we try a different set up with two conferences/divisions and figure out a schedule from there.
I don't know. Thoughts?
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: NHL Thread
You're running the show and I'm on board for whatever.philpritchard wrote:If we end up with ten teams, we can probably do up to a 72 game schedule (play everyone eight times). With 12 teams, we would probably do 66 (play everyone six times).
The other option is that we try a different set up with two conferences/divisions and figure out a schedule from there.
I don't know. Thoughts?
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8621
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: NHL Thread
@SkitchP wrote:You're running the show and I'm on board for whatever.philpritchard wrote:If we end up with ten teams, we can probably do up to a 72 game schedule (play everyone eight times). With 12 teams, we would probably do 66 (play everyone six times).
The other option is that we try a different set up with two conferences/divisions and figure out a schedule from there.
I don't know. Thoughts?
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: NHL Thread
If you need an additional team to balance anything I can set up and track a 2nd.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- Lament
- Commissioner
- Posts: 11792
- Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am
Re: NHL Thread
How many games do you plan on simming per day, phil? For your sake, it's important to strike a good balance.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: NHL Thread
I was thinking everyone plays two per day against the same team. My only concern is that I'm not sure I'll be able to do them on the weekendsLament wrote:How many games do you plan on simming per day, phil? For your sake, it's important to strike a good balance.
- Lament
- Commissioner
- Posts: 11792
- Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am
Re: NHL Thread
If you do two games a day, you'll save yourself a lot of time by having the same home team for both.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21690
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: NHL Thread
I'm cautiously optimistic about the Bruins' play right now. Tonight's game is going to do a lot to show how ready they are for the playoffs.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: NHL Thread
They look good right now, but I'm still pretty down on their chances in the playoffs.Simple Torture wrote:I'm cautiously optimistic about the Bruins' play right now. Tonight's game is going to do a lot to show how ready they are for the playoffs.
- southp
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 4:22 pm
- Location: Montreal
Re: NHL Thread
I'm hoping the Bruins get the Lightning in the first round and knock them out, while the Habs cruise past the Wings... setting up another Canadiens-Bruins 2nd round matchup.numbers wrote:They look good right now, but I'm still pretty down on their chances in the playoffs.Simple Torture wrote:I'm cautiously optimistic about the Bruins' play right now. Tonight's game is going to do a lot to show how ready they are for the playoffs.
- BigRedLedbetter
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 5401
- Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
- Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska
Re: NHL Thread
ARe we still doing the What If tourney? Sorry been MIA lately.
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: NHL Thread
We are, and I really need to get on posting the details, don't I?BigRedLedbetter wrote:ARe we still doing the What If tourney? Sorry been MIA lately.
We do, however, have southp taking part, and he's a real live Habs fan, so you may have to stick with the Stars and/or find a different team.
I think the Stars would actually be pretty solid, especially if you include the Minnesota years. Take the '98-'99 team, add in some Benn, Seguin, Broten and Ciccarelli, and you're good to go!
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: NHL Thread
Also, if anyone wants a second team, just go ahead and pick one and we'll go from there. It shouldn't be too hard; I don't think there will be much in-season maintenance since you have relatively little control over who plays. You just pick your starting lineup and goalie each game.
To recap:
1. Me - Toronto Maple Leafs
2. Skitch - Detroit Red Wings
3. Lament - Pittsburgh Penguins
4. #BRL - Dallas Stars
5. numbers - Boston Bruins
6. Kaius - St. Louis Blues
7. TBAMTS - Chicago Blackhawks
8. Mecca - Buffalo Sabres
9. southp - Montreal Canadiens
We definitely want an even number so teams don't have to have days off, and I'm ok with anywhere up to 16 teams (which would probably make for a 60 game schedule), but 12 teams/66 games is probably the most realistic. I'm definitely up for making a second team.
To recap:
1. Me - Toronto Maple Leafs
2. Skitch - Detroit Red Wings
3. Lament - Pittsburgh Penguins
4. #BRL - Dallas Stars
5. numbers - Boston Bruins
6. Kaius - St. Louis Blues
7. TBAMTS - Chicago Blackhawks
8. Mecca - Buffalo Sabres
9. southp - Montreal Canadiens
We definitely want an even number so teams don't have to have days off, and I'm ok with anywhere up to 16 teams (which would probably make for a 60 game schedule), but 12 teams/66 games is probably the most realistic. I'm definitely up for making a second team.
- BigRedLedbetter
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 5401
- Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
- Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska
Re: NHL Thread
philpritchard wrote:We are, and I really need to get on posting the details, don't I?BigRedLedbetter wrote:ARe we still doing the What If tourney? Sorry been MIA lately.
We do, however, have southp taking part, and he's a real live Habs fan, so you may have to stick with the Stars and/or find a different team.
I think the Stars would actually be pretty solid, especially if you include the Minnesota years. Take the '98-'99 team, add in some Benn, Seguin, Broten and Ciccarelli, and you're good to go!
No worries or rush just curious.
I figured there was a Canadians fan that existed around here. The Sabers are my fave Eastern Conference team. I'd rock a Sabers team if needed but looks like mecca has that. Pretty sure we know who his goalies will be.
That is essentially what I did. Def added Broten (on the 1980 USA team so I had to) and a couple guys from the Stanley Cup team that lost to the Pens in 91. Totally forgot Ciccarelli. Ughh! The 98-99 team alone was very talented top to bottom.
I did not know anything about hockey until the Stars moved to Dallas. I went to a game when I was 13 in their first year. That and NHL 94 for Sega got me hooked. I knew and liked those teams very well. I added Russ Courtnall, Dave Gagner, Ulf Dahlen and Andy Moog. This will be super fun.
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: NHL Thread
I know the positions don't actually matter much, but here's how I see my team lining up as of now. A couple really tough cuts, and there's a chance this could change quite a bit, but:
1920-21 Babe Dye - 1977-78 Darryl Sittler - 1934-35 Charlie Conacher
1940-41 Sweeney Schriner - 1947-48 Syl Apps - 1919-20 Corb Denneny
1977-78 Lanny McDonald - 1970-71 Dave Keon - 1943-44 Lorne Carr
1960-61 Frank Mahovlich - 1992-93 Doug Gilmour - 1993-94 Wendel Clark
2002-03 Alexander Mogilny - 1998-99 Mats Sundin - 1993-94 Dave Andreychuk
1977-78 Borje Salming - 1967-68 Tim Horton
2002-03 Tomas Kaberle - 1943-44 Babe Pratt
1976-77 Ian Turnbull - 2005-2006 Bryan McCabe
1952-53 Harry Lumley
1941-42 Turk Broda
Notice the significant lack of recent players. Because obviously.
1920-21 Babe Dye - 1977-78 Darryl Sittler - 1934-35 Charlie Conacher
1940-41 Sweeney Schriner - 1947-48 Syl Apps - 1919-20 Corb Denneny
1977-78 Lanny McDonald - 1970-71 Dave Keon - 1943-44 Lorne Carr
1960-61 Frank Mahovlich - 1992-93 Doug Gilmour - 1993-94 Wendel Clark
2002-03 Alexander Mogilny - 1998-99 Mats Sundin - 1993-94 Dave Andreychuk
1977-78 Borje Salming - 1967-68 Tim Horton
2002-03 Tomas Kaberle - 1943-44 Babe Pratt
1976-77 Ian Turnbull - 2005-2006 Bryan McCabe
1952-53 Harry Lumley
1941-42 Turk Broda
Notice the significant lack of recent players. Because obviously.
- BigRedLedbetter
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 5401
- Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
- Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska
Re: NHL Thread
Loooooooooved Mats Sundin.
If I ever have the extra cash I always wanted a Peter Stastny or Sundin Nordiques jersey.
If I ever have the extra cash I always wanted a Peter Stastny or Sundin Nordiques jersey.
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher