TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Books, movies, television...
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by tommymtcom »

Ban them, Ruddo. Ban them all.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35444
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by spike »

Beofluff
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by epilogue »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:You guys suck
Sorry, buddy, sorry

Image
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51786
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

One more time durden and I'm banning you from this thread and maybe all of A&E.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by tommymtcom »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:One more time durden and I'm banning you from this thread and maybe all of A&E.
Just do it, Ruddo. Nobody's ever going to respect you if you keep giving them chances.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by epilogue »

This thing isn't on Netflix streaming. So I added it to my regular queue.
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by tommymtcom »

It's on hulu
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by epilogue »

Oh really?!

That's probably been mentioned in the thread, huh? If I wasn't so busy fucking around, I'd already know that. But thanks for the heads up, boo.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51786
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

unlike TWD, this show just got very interesting...
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by tommymtcom »

Floki is really starting to piss me off.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by tommymtcom »

Image
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51786
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

tommymtcom wrote:Floki is really starting to piss me off.
me too. It is bothersome because he is my favorite character but I want him and Ragnar to be bff's.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51786
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

tommy, you caught up? I've got a few things:
Spoiler: show
1. Sad to see Athelstan go. I liked his character. So did my wife for different reasons. (she also thinks Rollo is hot)

2. Paris is turning out to be interesting. While I understand he wanted Floki to fail, I hope Ragnar and Floki patch things up.

3. I had no idea a lot of the main characters are actual people in viking history

4. That French princess is annoying

5. King Eckbert is annoying

6. I still think that guy that stole the Earl-dom from Lagertha and King Horik's son and Jarl Borg's wife are going to turn on Ragnar and the group.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51786
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Also, already renewed for season 4. Pretty excited about that.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by tommymtcom »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:tommy, you caught up? I've got a few things:
Spoiler: show
1. Sad to see Athelstan go. I liked his character. So did my wife for different reasons. (she also thinks Rollo is hot)

2. Paris is turning out to be interesting. While I understand he wanted Floki to fail, I hope Ragnar and Floki patch things up.

3. I had no idea a lot of the main characters are actual people in viking history

4. That French princess is annoying

5. King Eckbert is annoying

6. I still think that guy that stole the Earl-dom from Lagertha and King Horik's son and Jarl Borg's wife are going to turn on Ragnar and the group.
Spoiler: show
I was sad to see Athelstan go as well. He was definitely one of my favorite characters. I really want to see Floki pay for that one. I used to really like Floki, but now I would like to see Ragnar kill him.

The whole Paris attack was really stressful. There was definitely a point when I though Bjorn and Rollo were dead.

I don't really like any of the French characters yet, but we'll see how they develop.

King Eckbert is still awesome. I felt like he wasn't trustworthy the whole time, but I really wanted things to work out between him and Ragnar because they are a good team. I would like to see a spinoff featuring Ragnar, Athelstan and Eckbert.

And yeah, that guy is trouble. Especially since Lagertha straight up told him she intends to kill him. Don't say it, just do it.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
mf
AnalLog
Posts: 1232
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:24 pm
Contact:

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by mf »

tommymtcom wrote:
Spoiler: show
I would like to see a spinoff featuring Ragnar, Athelstan and Eckbert.
Spoiler: show
They would make a great buddy comedy

Image
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by bada »

tommymtcom wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Spoiler: show
6. I still think that guy that stole the Earl-dom from Lagertha and King Horik's son and Jarl Borg's wife are going to turn on Ragnar and the group.
Spoiler: show
And yeah, that guy is trouble. Especially since Lagertha straight up told him she intends to kill him. Don't say it, just do it.
Spoiler: show
Can we all agree that if we were that guy and Lagertha made that deal with one us we would agree as well?! :D
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by tommymtcom »

bada wrote:
tommymtcom wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Spoiler: show
6. I still think that guy that stole the Earl-dom from Lagertha and King Horik's son and Jarl Borg's wife are going to turn on Ragnar and the group.
Spoiler: show
And yeah, that guy is trouble. Especially since Lagertha straight up told him she intends to kill him. Don't say it, just do it.
Spoiler: show
Can we all agree that if we were that guy and Lagertha made that deal with one us we would agree as well?! :D
Absolutely. I would probably kill her after we were finished, though. Just to be safe.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by tommymtcom »

Spoiler: show
Ragnar better not fucking die.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51786
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: TV: Vikings (History Channel)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

tommymtcom wrote:
Spoiler: show
Ragnar better not fucking die.
Couple of thoughts on that, tommy:
Spoiler: show
1. The show producer has said in the past that he envisions the story going on after the death of Ragnar. While I hope so badly that is not the case, I could see it happening. But I liken it to Daryl dying on TWD, if that happens, a lot of viewers would leave the show.

2. Will be interesting to see if this is a ploy to trick the French, or if he was serious about being baptized. If serious, the rest of his people will be very angry. I hope it is a trick kind of like when we thought he and Floki were mad at each other before killing King Horik last season.

3. I don't think Ragnar will die yet as I think he has unfinished business with King Ecbert and the slaughter of his farming colony there.
Man, I really love this show.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
Post Reply