MLB

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by 4/5 »

numbers wrote:The argument, put a different way, is "Let me try and get a cheap bunt hit in a situation that I'd never normally bunt in because I want to stop this guy from getting a no hitter."
Does it matter who the guy is who is bunting? Is it the power hitter who hasn't bunted in three seasons or the second baseman who leads the league in bunt base hits?
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

It does to me, if it's a guy that bunts for hits all the time I have a lot less of problem.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37466
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

numbers wrote:The argument, put a different way, is "Let me try and get a cheap bunt hit in a situation that I'd never normally bunt in because I want to stop this guy from getting a no hitter."
It's not just about the hitter making the bunt. If the power hitter who is 0/3 so far puts down a "cheap bunt" he breaks up the momentum the pitcher has going, and makes it easier for the next guy in the lineup.

Both teams should just play to win the game as hard as they can within the confines of the rules and see what happens.
User avatar
CopperTom
Champion of RM
Posts: 10823
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania

Re: MLB

Post by CopperTom »

numbers wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
spike wrote:
numbers wrote:The Orioles are one of the worst "guardians of the game" teams.
must be a bird mascot thing
I feel like the Jays are being unfairly stereotyped here.
I've never gotten this from the Jays. The biggest ones I notice are Baltimore, the Cardinals, and Tampa. The Braves were a few a years ago, but they've had so much turnover the last few years I don't know if it's the same.
The Braves were justified against Gomez. Not so much against Fernandez
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by 4/5 »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:The argument, put a different way, is "Let me try and get a cheap bunt hit in a situation that I'd never normally bunt in because I want to stop this guy from getting a no hitter."
It's not just about the hitter making the bunt. If the power hitter who is 0/3 so far puts down a "cheap bunt" he breaks up the momentum the pitcher has going, and makes it easier for the next guy in the lineup.

Both teams should just play to win the game as hard as they can within the confines of the rules and see what happens.
My head agrees with you. But if a team is up 11-0, one out in the 9th and a guy who never bunts drops down a bunt base hit...I'd be lying if I said I wouldn't be pissed if I was a fan of the pitcher.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

I think, when a guy has a chance to do something historic and he has a big lead, try to get a hit like a man instead of doing something specifically to stop him from making history, rather than trying to win a game. Let's be honest, if it's 7-0 in the 8th inning and someone lays down a bunt, it's not to break up momentum.
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15608
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: MLB

Post by Chris_H_2 »

numbers wrote:It's kind of like not giving someone who is one hit away from a milestone a pitch to hit in a game that's in hand, which I would think is bush league also.
this is completely different. you're put in a situation where the opposing pitcher carries a no-hitter late into the game very, very infrequently. in your example the person that's one hit away from a milestone presumably will be hitting 4 times a game for every game to come. now, if that person is retiring after the end of the year and you're playing in game 160, then i can see how your example is appropos.

but i've never understood why you're supposed to accommodate a pitcher playing for a team that you're trying to beat.
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by 4/5 »

CopperTom wrote: Not so much against Fernandez
Ugh. That was the worst. Really, the worst part of it wasn't the Braves, it was the Marlins making him apologize.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15608
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: MLB

Post by Chris_H_2 »

cutuphalfdead wrote:Both teams should just play to win the game as hard as they can within the confines of the rules and see what happens.
100% this
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
numbers wrote:It's kind of like not giving someone who is one hit away from a milestone a pitch to hit in a game that's in hand, which I would think is bush league also.
this is completely different. you're put in a situation where the opposing pitcher carries a no-hitter late into the game very, very infrequently. in your example the person that's one hit away from a milestone presumably will be hitting 4 times a game for every game to come. now, if that person is retiring after the end of the year and you're playing in game 160, then i can see how your example is appropos.

but i've never understood why you're supposed to accommodate a pitcher playing for a team that you're trying to beat.
It's not the best example, but I was thinking about when no one would throw Maris a strike because they didn't want him to break that record. To me, that's bush league.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

numbers wrote:The argument, put a different way, is "Let me try and get a cheap bunt hit in a situation that I'd never normally bunt in because I want to stop this guy from getting a no hitter."
You're making three assumptions here that I think are wrong or inaccurate:

1. Bunt hits are cheap
2. The situation wouldn't normally call for a bunt
3. Getting a bunt hit is really easy
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

1. I think bunt hits ARE cheap in that situation, but obviously that's an opinion.
2. Nobody bunts down big late in the game.
3. They are easy in that situation because of #2.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

Guys, Jonny Gomes plays for the Braves.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

I loved Gomes in 2013, but then in 2014 I was like "this guy shouldn't be playing, ever."
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

I just saw David Price's stat line so far, this guy is going to get 1 billion dollars in the offseason.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

Seriously, wouldn't it cheapen it a little for the pitcher if you knew the other team wasn't doing everything they could to break it up?
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

philpritchard wrote:Seriously, wouldn't it cheapen it a little for the pitcher if you knew the other team wasn't doing everything they could to break it up?
No, it's not like they aren't trying.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

numbers wrote:
philpritchard wrote:Seriously, wouldn't it cheapen it a little for the pitcher if you knew the other team wasn't doing everything they could to break it up?
No, it's not like they aren't trying.
Well they kind of aren't.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

You guys act like games are rife with bunting late in blowouts, when it rarely happens and that's why it would be uncouth if a guy had a no no going.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

If a player has three home runs in a game, what's the unwritten rule about robbing him of a fourth at the wall?
Post Reply