again. nothing predictable about this year's picks. Pats are taking Ertz, i called it months ago!@SkitchP wrote:really houston?
2013 NFL Draft
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
Yeh, as far as I can tell La Canfora is the only one really tweeting early
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- ---
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
thank you for this@SkitchP wrote:Yeh, as far as I can tell La Canfora is the only one really tweeting early
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
GH is happy, team.Green Habit wrote:I'd be happy with either of the Williamses.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
Green Habit wrote:I'd be happy with either of the Williamses.elliseamos wrote:my guesses:
gb - eddie lacy
hou - robert woods
den - jesse williams
ne - sylvester williams
Jesse would be good for the Pats, he and Wilfork together would be scary.
- ---
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
looks like i will be wrong, pats might move down
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
Vikings trade up in the Pats spot. Schefter said earlier that the Vikes are angling for...ah, you can probably figure it out.
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
from hours ago.elliseamos wrote:based on this trend, i'm thinking the patriots will gain more picks and not add to their team tonight.
i got something right guys. i'm going to bed.
holy sh@t... pats got a boatload there.
Last edited by elliseamos on Fri April 26, 2013 3:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
Schefter also said that the Vikes would give up a 2, 3, and 4 to move up. That would be good, but that would also mean that the Pats move way down in the draft. I was glad that the Broncos didn't move down that far.--- wrote:looks like i will be wrong, pats might move down
- ---
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
even money says they move back up in the second roundGreen Habit wrote:Schefter also said that the Vikes would give up a 2, 3, and 4 to move up. That would be good, but that would also mean that the Pats move way down in the draft. I was glad that the Broncos didn't move down that far.--- wrote:looks like i will be wrong, pats might move down
- Fuck You Jobu
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
- Location: Wrigleyville
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
Nope.Green Habit wrote:Vikings trade up in the Pats spot. Schefter said earlier that the Vikes are angling for...ah, you can probably figure it out.
I guessed wrong too.
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
right.--- wrote:even money says they move back up in the second roundGreen Habit wrote:Schefter also said that the Vikes would give up a 2, 3, and 4 to move up. That would be good, but that would also mean that the Pats move way down in the draft. I was glad that the Broncos didn't move down that far.--- wrote:looks like i will be wrong, pats might move down
- ---
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
so NE ends up with five of the first 102 picks
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
elliseamos wrote:right.--- wrote:even money says they move back up in the second roundGreen Habit wrote:Schefter also said that the Vikes would give up a 2, 3, and 4 to move up. That would be good, but that would also mean that the Pats move way down in the draft. I was glad that the Broncos didn't move down that far.--- wrote:looks like i will be wrong, pats might move down
With what? Next years 1st? They dont have any 3rds to move back into the 2nd.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- ---
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
they have two thirds, bro@SkitchP wrote:elliseamos wrote:right.--- wrote:even money says they move back up in the second roundGreen Habit wrote:Schefter also said that the Vikes would give up a 2, 3, and 4 to move up. That would be good, but that would also mean that the Pats move way down in the draft. I was glad that the Broncos didn't move down that far.--- wrote:looks like i will be wrong, pats might move down
With what? Next years 1st? They dont have any 3rds to move back into the 2nd.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
--- wrote:they have two thirds, bro@SkitchP wrote:elliseamos wrote:right.--- wrote:even money says they move back up in the second roundGreen Habit wrote:Schefter also said that the Vikes would give up a 2, 3, and 4 to move up. That would be good, but that would also mean that the Pats move way down in the draft. I was glad that the Broncos didn't move down that far.--- wrote:looks like i will be wrong, pats might move down
With what? Next years 1st? They dont have any 3rds to move back into the 2nd.
Hmm. The NFL network guys said they wouldnt pick again until saturday. My mistake.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- ---
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
they were talking about the vikings@SkitchP wrote:--- wrote:they have two thirds, bro@SkitchP wrote:elliseamos wrote:right.--- wrote:even money says they move back up in the second roundGreen Habit wrote:Schefter also said that the Vikes would give up a 2, 3, and 4 to move up. That would be good, but that would also mean that the Pats move way down in the draft. I was glad that the Broncos didn't move down that far.--- wrote:looks like i will be wrong, pats might move down
With what? Next years 1st? They dont have any 3rds to move back into the 2nd.
Hmm. The NFL network guys said they wouldnt pick again until saturday. My mistake.
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
my fear is this will work out like the Greg? jennings trade when the pats ended up w/ chad flippin' jackson.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
But Minnesota ended up with three of the first 29 picks. I think both teams made out in good shape.--- wrote:so NE ends up with five of the first 102 picks
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Draft
Oh. I thought you were too.--- wrote:they were talking about the vikings@SkitchP wrote:--- wrote:they have two thirds, bro@SkitchP wrote:elliseamos wrote:right.--- wrote:even money says they move back up in the second roundGreen Habit wrote:Schefter also said that the Vikes would give up a 2, 3, and 4 to move up. That would be good, but that would also mean that the Pats move way down in the draft. I was glad that the Broncos didn't move down that far.--- wrote:looks like i will be wrong, pats might move down
With what? Next years 1st? They dont have any 3rds to move back into the 2nd.
Hmm. The NFL network guys said they wouldnt pick again until saturday. My mistake.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr