HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52023
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

spike wrote:
Mecca wrote:
spike wrote:
Mecca wrote:
spike wrote:hey nerds, if stannis legitimizes jon snow as a stark, does that weaken his claim to the throne as a targaryen?
probably not, cuz he'd be Jon Stark
right, but wouldn't the son of the eldest son of the mad king have more claim than a stark?
the explanation I have goes too much into book reader theory to post in the show thread, so I'll spoiler tag it and try to keep it least spoilery
Spoiler: show
Jon is very likely a Targ, but the circumstances of his birth aren't very well known. He's a bastard in many people's eyes no matter which way you cut it because Rhaegar was already married to Elia Martell, even if Valyrians practiced polygamy. Even is he has a Targ father, Stannis is only legally legitimizing him as Stark if he did take the deal, so his claim as a Targ would only be as a bastard. A legitimate son of a Targaryean would have a better claim than a bastard. Either way, if a claim is disputed, it pretty much comes to war and whoever wins gets the claim. I doubt Jon would want war over something he probably never wanted, whereas being a Stark was always his desire
Spoiler: show
good point. if jon was legitimized as either, it doesn't seem his character would be motivated to rule all of westeros anyway.
Spoiler: show
Who were you calling a nerd, spike?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35959
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by spike »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
spike wrote:
Mecca wrote:
spike wrote:
Mecca wrote:
spike wrote:hey nerds, if stannis legitimizes jon snow as a stark, does that weaken his claim to the throne as a targaryen?
probably not, cuz he'd be Jon Stark
right, but wouldn't the son of the eldest son of the mad king have more claim than a stark?
the explanation I have goes too much into book reader theory to post in the show thread, so I'll spoiler tag it and try to keep it least spoilery
Spoiler: show
Jon is very likely a Targ, but the circumstances of his birth aren't very well known. He's a bastard in many people's eyes no matter which way you cut it because Rhaegar was already married to Elia Martell, even if Valyrians practiced polygamy. Even is he has a Targ father, Stannis is only legally legitimizing him as Stark if he did take the deal, so his claim as a Targ would only be as a bastard. A legitimate son of a Targaryean would have a better claim than a bastard. Either way, if a claim is disputed, it pretty much comes to war and whoever wins gets the claim. I doubt Jon would want war over something he probably never wanted, whereas being a Stark was always his desire
Spoiler: show
good point. if jon was legitimized as either, it doesn't seem his character would be motivated to rule all of westeros anyway.
Spoiler: show
Who were you calling a nerd, spike?
;)
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15599
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Chris_H_2 »

spike wrote:hey nerds, if stannis legitimizes jon snow as a stark, does that weaken his claim to the throne as a targaryen?
wait. what? when did i miss this in the episodes (the last part)?
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85154
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by epilogue »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
spike wrote:hey nerds, if stannis legitimizes jon snow as a stark, does that weaken his claim to the throne as a targaryen?
wait. what? when did i miss this in the episodes (the last part)?
You didn't miss anything. It's pure speculation.
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15599
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Chris_H_2 »

durdencommatyler wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
spike wrote:hey nerds, if stannis legitimizes jon snow as a stark, does that weaken his claim to the throne as a targaryen?
wait. what? when did i miss this in the episodes (the last part)?
You didn't miss anything. It's pure speculation.
based on what? that's the part i'm missing.

spike's post make it sound as if this is something that's pretty much known. and without reading the books, i certainly haven't picked up on anything even remotely suggesting jon snow is a targaryen. the only thing i know is that melisandre thinks he has royal blood.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37454
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Norah »

Not super spoilery, but put in the spoiler code for those who wish to ignore this stuff entirely.
Spoiler: show
Ned came back from Robert's Rebellion with Jon Snow, apparently his bastard. But Ned Stark was not the type to fuck around behind his wife's back, he has too much honor for that. During the rebellion, Lyana Stark was "raped" and then later apparently carried off by Rhaegar Targarean to the Tower of Joy where she died, or so the story goes as far as the victor's tell it. Lyana dies and on her death bed she asks Ned to promise her something, which he does. This promise haunts him until the end of his days, but no one knows what it is.

The speculation is Lyana was not raped, but slept with Rhaegar willingly and bore him a son. The speculation is Lyana made Ned promise ti raise the boy as his own to escape the fate of the other Targarean heirs.

The only people who know what happened, and thus know the truth of Jon's parentage, were at the showdown at the Tower of Joy where Lyana died. The only one of those people still alive is Howland Reed.

I may be simplifying it or leaving bits out, other book readers can expand on it or correct me.
Last edited by Norah on Tue May 05, 2015 7:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52023
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

everyone just calm down
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35959
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by spike »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
spike wrote:hey nerds, if stannis legitimizes jon snow as a stark, does that weaken his claim to the throne as a targaryen?
wait. what? when did i miss this in the episodes (the last part)?
You didn't miss anything. It's pure speculation.
based on what? that's the part i'm missing.

spike's post make it sound as if this is something that's pretty much known. and without reading the books, i certainly haven't picked up on anything even remotely suggesting jon snow is a targaryen. the only thing i know is that melisandre thinks he has royal blood.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/0 ... 04058.html
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Kaius »

So, spike just spoiled something for show-watchers that one would only know if they read the books or looked it up on the internet? Nice.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35959
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by spike »

Kaius wrote:So, spike just spoiled something for show-watchers that one would only know if they read the books or looked it up on the internet? Nice.
it's all speculative.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Simple Torture »

Kaius wrote:So, spike just spoiled something for show-watchers that one would only know if they read the books or looked it up on the internet? Nice.
The nods and winks in the last episode for this particular plot point were just as strong--if not stronger--than anything from the books. I think it's analogous to what happened in season 1--if one of your show-watching-only friends said to you around episode 3, "Hey, I'm pretty sure Joffrey isn't Robert's son"--and they picked it up just from the way the characters looked, acted, and the fact that Jaime was schtooping Cersei, would you consider that a spoiler?
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85154
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by epilogue »

spike wrote:
Kaius wrote:So, spike just spoiled something for show-watchers that one would only know if they read the books or looked it up on the internet? Nice.
it's all speculative.
I just can't stress this enough. It's one possible theory. But, yes, it's totally speculative. Book readers don't know. TV watcher's don't know. There is more in the books maybe to support the theory, but everything that Pete laid out in that spoiler above has happened in the show.

So, you don't have to be a book reader to have theorized what spike has theorized. It's all there. But nothing is confirmed at this point. It's all speculation.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Kaius »

I see. Sorry spike.

Though the Lannister incest comparison is a bit off considering they were literally fucking on screen in the first episode.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Simple Torture »

Kaius wrote:I see. Sorry spike.

Though the Lannister incest comparison is a bit off considering they were literally fucking on screen in the first episode.
I guess the comparison to throw back at you would be almost like a photo-negative: could you ever see Ned fooling around with someone besides Catelyn?
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11941
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by The Argonaut »

Jon Snow might be interested in being the king if winter comes and he's the only person who can unite everyone against the White Walkers. I don't see him being very interested in going up against Stannis, Dany, and Cersei for no reason. But if his taking the throne can end that civil war and unify everyone against the White Walkers, he would do it. We've already seen him play fast and loose with the rules of his oath.
Please consider voting for me
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8620
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Mecca »

The Argonaut wrote:Jon Snow might be interested in being the king if winter comes and he's the only person who can unite everyone against the White Walkers. I don't see him being very interested in going up against Stannis, Dany, and Cersei for no reason. But if his taking the throne can end that civil war and unify everyone against the White Walkers, he would do it. We've already seen him play fast and loose with the rules of his oath.
yeah, but if taking the throne meant more war, I don't think it would be his prerogative
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85154
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by epilogue »

If this thing ends with Jon on the Throne it'll be fucking weird and totally out of character. Whatever else that guy wants, it isn't to be King.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Kaius »

Simple Torture wrote:
Kaius wrote:I see. Sorry spike.

Though the Lannister incest comparison is a bit off considering they were literally fucking on screen in the first episode.
I guess the comparison to throw back at you would be almost like a photo-negative: could you ever see Ned fooling around with someone besides Catelyn?
I get it, I do, but yeah, I could see it. He was newlywed, off at war, and fucked up. Not a stretch, even for a man of honor.
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11941
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by The Argonaut »

In the last episode, Littlefinger said that Ned didn't seem like the type.
Please consider voting for me
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85154
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by epilogue »

This is gonna sound so totally pretentious, so I apologize. Please forgive me. But anyone who thinks Ned could have had an affair isn't paying attention to Game of Thrones. Literally, THIS. ENTIRE. MESS. comes about -- LITERALLY -- because he isn't that kinda dude.
Post Reply