HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Kaius »

Welp.
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11941
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by The Argonaut »

I like when the same people are posting in this thread and the book thread at the same time. It means that the book people are either
a) expanding on the theories that they're touching on in here, or
b) making fun of the dumb theories of the TV people.
Please consider voting for me
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85154
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by epilogue »

I tried not to make that post. I wrote and deleted a few different versions of it multiple times. I might just go back and delete it all together. I said it was gonna be bad.
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8620
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Mecca »

durdencommatyler wrote:This is gonna sound so totally pretentious, so I apologize. Please forgive me. But anyone who thinks Ned could have had an affair isn't paying attention to Game of Thrones. Literally, THIS. ENTIRE. MESS. comes about -- LITERALLY -- because he isn't that kinda dude.
I thought it was because Littlefinger twisted his mustache and convinced Lysa to poison Jon Arryn and blame the Lannisters?
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8620
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Mecca »

The Argonaut wrote:I like when the same people are posting in this thread and the book thread at the same time. It means that the book people are either
a) expanding on the theories that they're touching on in here, or
b) making fun of the dumb theories of the TV people.
"Honor above all else" is Ned Stark's code throughout the entire first season.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85154
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by epilogue »

Mecca wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:This is gonna sound so totally pretentious, so I apologize. Please forgive me. But anyone who thinks Ned could have had an affair isn't paying attention to Game of Thrones. Literally, THIS. ENTIRE. MESS. comes about -- LITERALLY -- because he isn't that kinda dude.
I thought it was because Littlefinger twisted his mustache and convinced Lysa to poison Jon Arryn and blame the Lannisters?
:haha:
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11941
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by The Argonaut »

Mecca wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:I like when the same people are posting in this thread and the book thread at the same time. It means that the book people are either
a) expanding on the theories that they're touching on in here, or
b) making fun of the dumb theories of the TV people.
"Honor above all else" is Ned Stark's code throughout the entire first season.
Oh, my post wasn't about joey's post. His idea makes perfect sense. Ned didn't let the Lannasters get away with their bullshit, even if it meant his own death and a Lannister-Baratheon war.
Please consider voting for me
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85154
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by epilogue »

Like I said previous, as a book reader, there is nothing that anyone has said in this thread over the last few pages --- including what Spike said, and what Pete put in a spoiler tag --- that isn't IN THE TV SHOW. Yes, there is more to support various theories in the books, but nothing has been said in this thread (at least recently) that isn't supported by the show.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85154
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by epilogue »

The Argonaut wrote:
Mecca wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:I like when the same people are posting in this thread and the book thread at the same time. It means that the book people are either
a) expanding on the theories that they're touching on in here, or
b) making fun of the dumb theories of the TV people.
"Honor above all else" is Ned Stark's code throughout the entire first season.
Oh, my post wasn't about joey's post. His idea makes perfect sense. Ned didn't let the Lannasters get away with their bullshit, even if it meant his own death and a Lannister-Baratheon war.
:luv:

I love you, Argo.
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8620
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Mecca »

The Argonaut wrote:
Mecca wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:I like when the same people are posting in this thread and the book thread at the same time. It means that the book people are either
a) expanding on the theories that they're touching on in here, or
b) making fun of the dumb theories of the TV people.
"Honor above all else" is Ned Stark's code throughout the entire first season.
Oh, my post wasn't about joey's post. His idea makes perfect sense. Ned didn't let the Lannasters get away with their bullshit, even if it meant his own death and a Lannister-Baratheon war.
also, 90% of teh posts in the book thread are making fun of you
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by spike »

Mecca wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:
Mecca wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:I like when the same people are posting in this thread and the book thread at the same time. It means that the book people are either
a) expanding on the theories that they're touching on in here, or
b) making fun of the dumb theories of the TV people.
"Honor above all else" is Ned Stark's code throughout the entire first season.
Oh, my post wasn't about joey's post. His idea makes perfect sense. Ned didn't let the Lannasters get away with their bullshit, even if it meant his own death and a Lannister-Baratheon war.
also, 90% of teh posts in the book thread are making fun of you
kinda like chud and GD
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35418
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Strat »

I feel like im missing about 90% of the show since i dont read the books. Fuck this.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by spike »

Strat wrote:I feel like im missing about 90% of the show since i dont read the books. Fuck this.
there are some good recaps out there online, man. i don't read those tomes either.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37454
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Norah »

I've definitely heard non book readers speculate that lyana was Jon's mother.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Kaius »

I guess what I'm missing is how just because Ned is Mr. Honor in his later years, which is obvious, that means he couldn't have done something dishonorable in his youth? Time passes, people change. He carries this blanket of civic duty born from honor and what may be guilt left from having a bastard son while away at war. I can also see how that guilt isn't guilt at all, and is rather a conflict of keeping his word to his sister in laws dying wish or being truthful to his queen, but I still don't see how it is a no brainer like you guys are implying.
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15599
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Chris_H_2 »

From now on can we just put speculation and theories in spoilers?
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by spike »

Chris_H_2 wrote:From now on can we just put speculation and theories in spoilers?
jesus christ
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8620
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Mecca »

spike wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:From now on can we just put speculation and theories in spoilers?
jesus christ
it was never proven that he lived, please spoiler that name as its only speculative
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11941
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by The Argonaut »

This thread should only be used for shot-by-shot plot re-caps of the episode we all just watched. Stannis talked to his daughter. Barristan got stabbed. I will not speculate on whether or not he is still alive.
Please consider voting for me
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35418
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Strat »

spike wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:From now on can we just put speculation and theories in spoilers?
jesus christ

I'd abort christ for you.
Post Reply