HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35418
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
how about the unsully's getting their asses kicked though?
How about those religious fucks ridding of all the hot naughty sluts?
How about those religious fucks ridding of all the hot naughty sluts?
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8620
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
seemed like they were going after gay guys mostlyStrat wrote:how about the unsully's getting their asses kicked though?
How about those religious fucks ridding of all the hot naughty sluts?
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35418
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Yea well who interrupts someone getting laid? Cock blockers. Thats who.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35960
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
you'll find out soon enough, trying to shag in all those hostels you're staying in, bro.Strat wrote:Yea well who interrupts someone getting laid? Cock blockers. Thats who.
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15599
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
You posted something that reads as a fact based on an article that contains the disclaimer that it contains spoilers from the books. I didn't think I was asking too much for people to hit the spoiler link.spike wrote:if you want to avoid GoT speculation, if it's really going to ruin the show for you, i suggest avoiding the fucking GoT thread because it's always been 90% speculation.Chris_H_2 wrote:sorry I missed the obviously blatant connection between Jon Snow and the Targaryens because I didn't read the fucking huffington post.spike wrote:jesus christChris_H_2 wrote:From now on can we just put speculation and theories in spoilers?
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35960
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
dude, that article doesn't contain any spoilers. it just attempts to connect the dots a bit using stuff in the latest episode.Chris_H_2 wrote:You posted something that reads as a fact based on an article that contains the disclaimer that it contains spoilers from the books. I didn't think I was asking too much for people to hit the spoiler link.spike wrote:if you want to avoid GoT speculation, if it's really going to ruin the show for you, i suggest avoiding the fucking GoT thread because it's always been 90% speculation.Chris_H_2 wrote:sorry I missed the obviously blatant connection between Jon Snow and the Targaryens because I didn't read the fucking huffington post.spike wrote:jesus christChris_H_2 wrote:From now on can we just put speculation and theories in spoilers?
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52023
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
E.H. Ruddock wrote:everyone just calm down
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
I love this show.
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15599
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Sorry, I have to disagree with you on this one. You appealed to the "nerds" because evidently you didn't think it was intuitive from what we already know from the shows. And as I said, you weren't even speculating -- you were passing something off as a matter of fact based on what you read in an article, not what you saw on the shows. Your post went beyond "hey guys, just speculating here, but do you think there's any connection between ... ?"spike wrote:dude, that article doesn't contain any spoilers. it just attempts to connect the dots a bit using stuff in the latest episode.Chris_H_2 wrote:You posted something that reads as a fact based on an article that contains the disclaimer that it contains spoilers from the books. I didn't think I was asking too much for people to hit the spoiler link.spike wrote:if you want to avoid GoT speculation, if it's really going to ruin the show for you, i suggest avoiding the fucking GoT thread because it's always been 90% speculation.Chris_H_2 wrote:sorry I missed the obviously blatant connection between Jon Snow and the Targaryens because I didn't read the fucking huffington post.spike wrote:jesus christChris_H_2 wrote:From now on can we just put speculation and theories in spoilers?
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Keep fighting the good fight, Chris.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35960
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
i found the article later because it was a nice little synopsis of the R+L=J theory as it relates to the latest episode, saving me from having to type it out. the theory is pretty well known among readers and watchers, and besides, that's all it is - a theory. just because i pass it off as a matter of fact doesn't mean it isn't speculation. it may feel like a spoiler, but it isn't spoiling anything, because it isn't anything that's been written down in a book or tv script.Chris_H_2 wrote:Sorry, I have to disagree with you on this one. You appealed to the "nerds" because evidently you didn't think it was intuitive from what we already know from the shows. And as I said, you weren't even speculating -- you were passing something off as a matter of fact based on what you read in an article, not what you saw on the shows. Your post went beyond "hey guys, just speculating here, but do you think there's any connection between ... ?"spike wrote:dude, that article doesn't contain any spoilers. it just attempts to connect the dots a bit using stuff in the latest episode.Chris_H_2 wrote:You posted something that reads as a fact based on an article that contains the disclaimer that it contains spoilers from the books. I didn't think I was asking too much for people to hit the spoiler link.spike wrote:if you want to avoid GoT speculation, if it's really going to ruin the show for you, i suggest avoiding the fucking GoT thread because it's always been 90% speculation.Chris_H_2 wrote:sorry I missed the obviously blatant connection between Jon Snow and the Targaryens because I didn't read the fucking huffington post.spike wrote:jesus christChris_H_2 wrote:From now on can we just put speculation and theories in spoilers?
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Wait. Wasn't Chris on my side on the paaks debate
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Nevermind, misread the quotes, Im team #ChrisH
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15599
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
i closed the ellipses just for youKaius wrote:Keep fighting the good fight, Chris.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Yeah, I went and reread my exchange with paaks, and spike's side is pretty similar to his.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8620
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
if you say his name a 3rd time, he'll appear and spoil another aspect of the series@SkitchP wrote:Yeah, I went and reread my exchange with paaks, and spike's side is pretty similar to his.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37455
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
All these show watchers are gonna be pissed when everyone just dies of greyscale.Mecca wrote:if you say his name a 3rd time, he'll appear and spoil another aspect of the series@SkitchP wrote:Yeah, I went and reread my exchange with paaks, and spike's side is pretty similar to his.
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8620
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
you know, not too long ago you used to be a show only person that we'd laugh about in the book threadcutuphalfdead wrote:All these show watchers are gonna be pissed when everyone just dies of greyscale.Mecca wrote:if you say his name a 3rd time, he'll appear and spoil another aspect of the series@SkitchP wrote:Yeah, I went and reread my exchange with paaks, and spike's side is pretty similar to his.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35960
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
now that the show's running out of book, i suspect the show will make jon snow into much more of a hero/savior than the books will.Mecca wrote:you know, not too long ago you used to be a show only person that we'd laugh about in the book threadcutuphalfdead wrote:All these show watchers are gonna be pissed when everyone just dies of greyscale.Mecca wrote:if you say his name a 3rd time, he'll appear and spoil another aspect of the series@SkitchP wrote:Yeah, I went and reread my exchange with paaks, and spike's side is pretty similar to his.
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15599
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
All I know is that I'm going to be livid in 2 years when they reveal Jon Snow's lineage and I already know it because ... you know ... Pearl Jam.