The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by tommymtcom »

Image

:haha:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

Classic B, Tommy.
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by tommymtcom »

Oh god, have you guys been talking about that already?
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

Not really. But I did post an article about it on the last page or two.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Pacific Rim 2 release date: August, 2017
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by epilogue »

Charlie Day in it?
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by bada »

I think my 8 year old would love Pacific Rim but I don't really feel like watching it again.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by epilogue »

That's the opposite of a ringing endorsement, bada.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

durdencommatyler wrote:Charlie Day in it?
Yes
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35453
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by spike »

User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by epilogue »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Charlie Day in it?
Yes
:hooray:
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Chris Hemsworth joins Paul Feig's Ghostbusters as the receptionist

Paul Feig decided to disrupt Twitter on Wednesday by dropping this bombshell: Thor himself, Chris Hemsworth, will appear in the director’s female-led reboot of Ghostbusters as the ladies’ receptionist.

Move aside, Annie Potts! (She played the clerical role in the first two Ghostbusters films.) Hemsworth is the latest addition in the gender-flipped reimagining of Ghostbusters, joining Kristen Wiig, Melissa McCarthy, Kate McKinnon and Leslie Jones in the cast. “Those four ladies I have starring in it are so funny and that’s half the battle,” Feig said in a recent interview about the project. “I’m going to battle with the best army I have. My whole crew from all my other movies have come aboard, and some great special effects people have come aboard—I have never really done this level of effects before—and I’m excited!”

Hemsworth appeared in Avengers: Age of Ultron back in May, and will next be seen in the Vacation remake starring Ed Helms. (One more ’80s comedy for a trend, Mr. Hemsworth.)

Feig’s Ghostbusters is out in July of next year.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

I wish I could be excited for this movie but goddammit Paul Feig is fucking terrible
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:I wish I could be excited for this movie but goddammit Paul Feig is fucking terrible
I bet strat tommy and joey will love it.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I wish I could be excited for this movie but goddammit Paul Feig is fucking terrible
I bet strat tommy and joey will love it.
Oh, I'm sure.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I wish I could be excited for this movie but goddammit Paul Feig is fucking terrible
I bet strat tommy and joey will love it.
Oh, I'm sure.
Well, I'm pretty much against this film being made on principle. However, I'll take the vermin's path this time and give it the benefit of the doubt. Maybe Feig & Co have some really great new take on Ghostbusters. I'll absolutely see it (as I adore Feig's work on TV shows like The Office, and I like the ladies involved; also, Chris Hemsworth's abs :li: ) but I have a strong feeling I'm not going to like it.

I hope I'm wrong. I'll give the thing every opportunity to prove itself.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36494
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Jorge »

I want to watch it. I actually really liked Walk Hard, even if that kind of spoof often doesn't really do it for me.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by epilogue »

I liked Walk Hard a lot, yeah. But I'm not sure what that has to do with Ghostbusters.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Strat »

paul Feig was in Ski Patrol, so yea, ill probably watch it.

Ghostbusters should be untouchable though so...
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

durdencommatyler wrote:I liked Walk Hard a lot, yeah. But I'm not sure what that has to do with Ghostbusters.
Yeah, I'm very confused by that reference.
Post Reply