HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8620
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Mecca »

@SkitchP wrote:One thing that I really didnt get was that leading up to this, I was under the impression that the dragons were basically invincible, or damn near. Meanwhile, this biggest one seemed significantly slowed when it got hit by pointy sticks.
Carryover from other fantasy stories? I don't feel like the show made them out to be invincible, just very powerful creatures.
jwfocker
AnalLog
Posts: 1855
Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 9:44 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by jwfocker »

Yeah the dragons are more of a shock and awe type. not invincible.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by @SkitchP »

jwfocker wrote:Yeah the dragons are more of a shock and awe type. not invincible.

Im overstating I think. I just really didnt expect it to get seriously slowed by sticks. Frankly, the giants are more impressive in battle than the dragons then.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8620
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Mecca »

@SkitchP wrote:
jwfocker wrote:Yeah the dragons are more of a shock and awe type. not invincible.

Im overstating I think. I just really didnt expect it to get seriously slowed by sticks. Frankly, the giants are more impressive in battle than the dragons then.
Why Drogon didn't use more fire is beyond me
jwfocker
AnalLog
Posts: 1855
Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 9:44 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by jwfocker »

@SkitchP wrote:
jwfocker wrote:Yeah the dragons are more of a shock and awe type. not invincible.

Im overstating I think. I just really didnt expect it to get seriously slowed by sticks. Frankly, the giants are more impressive in battle than the dragons then.
Well they are motherfucking giants. better be awesome. but yeah I agree. They made Drogon a little too weak.
User avatar
doone
Future Drummer
Posts: 3404
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:17 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: right there

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by doone »

jwfocker wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
jwfocker wrote:Yeah the dragons are more of a shock and awe type. not invincible.

Im overstating I think. I just really didnt expect it to get seriously slowed by sticks. Frankly, the giants are more impressive in battle than the dragons then.
Well they are motherfucking giants. better be awesome. but yeah I agree. They made Drogon a little too weak.
Drogon's still a baby. Give him time.
bada wrote:Cause the two girls on the board voted for the rapey song.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by spike »

so khaleesi got away on her dragon, but aren't tyrion and company still surrounded by take no prisoners harpys? will they all of a sudden be just fine next week, or was that meant to be a cliffhanger and meereen won't be revisted until next season?
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Monkey_Driven »

doone wrote:
jwfocker wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
jwfocker wrote:Yeah the dragons are more of a shock and awe type. not invincible.

Im overstating I think. I just really didnt expect it to get seriously slowed by sticks. Frankly, the giants are more impressive in battle than the dragons then.
Well they are motherfucking giants. better be awesome. but yeah I agree. They made Drogon a little too weak.
Drogon's still a baby. Give him time.
Still a kid and this was his first battle. It makes sense.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Simple Torture »

spike wrote:so khaleesi got away on her dragon, but aren't tyrion and company still surrounded by take no prisoners harpys? will they all of a sudden be just fine next week, or was that meant to be a cliffhanger and meereen won't be revisted until next season?
There are still 2 dragons in Mereen.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Simple Torture »

Image
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by @SkitchP »

Monkey_Driven wrote:
doone wrote:
jwfocker wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
jwfocker wrote:Yeah the dragons are more of a shock and awe type. not invincible.

Im overstating I think. I just really didnt expect it to get seriously slowed by sticks. Frankly, the giants are more impressive in battle than the dragons then.
Well they are motherfucking giants. better be awesome. but yeah I agree. They made Drogon a little too weak.
Drogon's still a baby. Give him time.
Still a kid and this was his first battle. It makes sense.

First battle or not, my concern wasnt about fighting skill, it was about pretty unimpressive physical vulnerability. How did the Targaryen's takeover/unite Westeros with 3 dragons if just the most basic of weapons can slow them down. Hell, one well placed cannonball could probably kill the damn thing.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Monkey_Driven »

@SkitchP wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
doone wrote:
jwfocker wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
jwfocker wrote:Yeah the dragons are more of a shock and awe type. not invincible.

Im overstating I think. I just really didnt expect it to get seriously slowed by sticks. Frankly, the giants are more impressive in battle than the dragons then.
Well they are motherfucking giants. better be awesome. but yeah I agree. They made Drogon a little too weak.
Drogon's still a baby. Give him time.
Still a kid and this was his first battle. It makes sense.

First battle or not, my concern wasnt about fighting skill, it was about pretty unimpressive physical vulnerability. How did the Targaryen's takeover/unite Westeros with 3 dragons if just the most basic of weapons can slow them down. Hell, one well placed cannonball could probably kill the damn thing.
I kind of get the feeling dragons don't land a whole lot in open field battle.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by spike »

i didn't think drogon seemed too slowed after the spears, so not really sure what skitch is getting at.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35420
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Strat »

Monkey_Driven wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
doone wrote:
jwfocker wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
jwfocker wrote:Yeah the dragons are more of a shock and awe type. not invincible.

Im overstating I think. I just really didnt expect it to get seriously slowed by sticks. Frankly, the giants are more impressive in battle than the dragons then.
Well they are motherfucking giants. better be awesome. but yeah I agree. They made Drogon a little too weak.
Drogon's still a baby. Give him time.
Still a kid and this was his first battle. It makes sense.

First battle or not, my concern wasnt about fighting skill, it was about pretty unimpressive physical vulnerability. How did the Targaryen's takeover/unite Westeros with 3 dragons if just the most basic of weapons can slow them down. Hell, one well placed cannonball could probably kill the damn thing.
I kind of get the feeling dragons don't land a whole lot in open field battle.
I was mostly perplexed as to how a billion spears landed on drogon but they couldnt throw one at Khaleesi
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36766
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Jorge »

I've never seen an episode of this show, but sometimes I'll pop in and read a page or two of this thread. Watching Skitch debate a dragon's power and fighting skill has been fun.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36766
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Jorge »

Also, the dragon's name is... Drogon?
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8620
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Mecca »

@SkitchP wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
doone wrote:
jwfocker wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
jwfocker wrote:Yeah the dragons are more of a shock and awe type. not invincible.

Im overstating I think. I just really didnt expect it to get seriously slowed by sticks. Frankly, the giants are more impressive in battle than the dragons then.
Well they are motherfucking giants. better be awesome. but yeah I agree. They made Drogon a little too weak.
Drogon's still a baby. Give him time.
Still a kid and this was his first battle. It makes sense.

First battle or not, my concern wasnt about fighting skill, it was about pretty unimpressive physical vulnerability. How did the Targaryen's takeover/unite Westeros with 3 dragons if just the most basic of weapons can slow them down. Hell, one well placed cannonball could probably kill the damn thing.
Dragons in battle would roast a large area. Aegon the Conquerer had a small army, but 3 fully grown dragons. See the Field of Fire http://gameofthrones.wikia.com/wiki/Field_of_Fire
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8620
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Mecca »

theplatypus wrote:Also, the dragon's name is... Drogon?
The dragons are named after people in her life:
Her husband Drogo
Brother Viserys
Child Rhaego

Drogon
Viserion
Rhaegal
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Kaius »

A small arena isn't the best fight venue for a dragon, though it's not as if he didn't clear out a bunch of guys pretty quickly, but I was also surprised when the spears went in and it was obviously affected by them. Ride a dragon into open field battle and I think we have a BBQ.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Simple Torture »

@SkitchP wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
doone wrote:
jwfocker wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
jwfocker wrote:Yeah the dragons are more of a shock and awe type. not invincible.

Im overstating I think. I just really didnt expect it to get seriously slowed by sticks. Frankly, the giants are more impressive in battle than the dragons then.
Well they are motherfucking giants. better be awesome. but yeah I agree. They made Drogon a little too weak.
Drogon's still a baby. Give him time.
Still a kid and this was his first battle. It makes sense.

First battle or not, my concern wasnt about fighting skill, it was about pretty unimpressive physical vulnerability. How did the Targaryen's takeover/unite Westeros with 3 dragons if just the most basic of weapons can slow them down. Hell, one well placed cannonball could probably kill the damn thing.
There are technical answers, for sure: Balerion the Black Dread was much bigger and more powerful than Drogon, and he was just one of five dragons Aegon I brought over; those Targaryans had been riding dragons for generations, and Dany had yet (until last night) to figure out how to ride Drogon; and, as others have said, Drogon was young and foolish enough to land in an open field instead of circling high overhead and raining fire on everyone.

But from a narrative perspective, I think your reaction is what the showrunners were going for. Paired with last week's episode, everyone is imagining that the forces of ice (Others, wights) will eventually collide with the forces of fire (dragons); if dragons were damn-near invincible, that impending war would seem like an afterthought. Seeing a dragon be hurt by conventional weapons will add drama to what's coming next.
McParadigm wrote:lol
Post Reply