Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36489
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by Jorge »

BurtReynolds wrote:honestly i haven't seen it. i just wait for McP to post and then disagree with him.

no for real this time. honestly. I just cant deal with this deus ex machina bullshit anymore. How can you have any drama when the writers can just break the rules to get the hero out of a jam anytime they want? its just false. Here, its especially stupid, as its available the whole time (unless some ridiculous shit like the power being out happens or something, which is even worse). No matter how fantastic the setting, these worlds have rules.

The silly laser scene in part 2 was pretty bad (and remember, you can only use it once! for eternity it seems, as it doesnt show up at all in 3), and its repeated here a half dozen times.

the character doesn't seem to change or develop in any way that makes this movie matter. Wasnt he an alcoholic once? oh I guess he just isn't now. that might have been interesting to explore. I don't know, something. the best of these movies generally work because the main character, no matter how powerful, has some personal flaw to overcome or realization to make. Its absent here. He's just a guy who gets helped out by writers when he gets in trouble.
Spoiler: show
Nope.

Not using the "House Party protocol" earlier in the movie is justified within the story: the gate was buried under tons of rock when Stark's house was destroyed. In fact, it is referenced directly in an earlier scene, way before they're deployed: Jarvis informs Tony that "the cranes are in Malibu and the gates are being cleared as we speak", to which Tony responds "Okay, but what about the suit I'm wearing now?". It's addressed. Now, if your problem is simply that the filmmakers chose to obstruct this plot device in order to leave the most visually impressive and dramatic solution for when it will be most dramatic, aka the film's climax... uh... that's a silly criticism for a movie like this.

As far as Tony's arc, it seemed very clear to me from the get-go, and it was continuously reiterated throughout the film: the events in The Avengers, which showed him for the first time just how ridiculously outgunned he is against the superhuman threats out there, left him reeling for months. He spends his days tinkering incessantly with his suits (the suit in the Avengers is Mark 7... we're up to at least Mark 42 in this film), becoming increasingly isolated from actual human contact, alienating his friends and sabotaging his relationship. The film is about him coming to terms with the fact that the suits (or "cocoons" as he refers to it in the closing monologue) don't make the man. This is why we see him lugging it around like a crutch, and why the filmmakers chose to leave him out of his suit for most of the movie. There's a scene near the end when Tony's laying on the floor and he's staring at the Mark 42 helmet, smoldering in the fire, and that's when his epiphany happens. This is why it's so cathartic when him and Pepper embrace while all his suits self-destruct around them like fireworks. To me, it was a much more interesting arc than falling into the "Tony's a drunk" silliness from the previous film. This had already been worked out: he was self-destructing since he knew he was dying from blood poisoning. Revisiting that would've been redundant and, frankly, a little boring.

This is a pretty fantastic movie on most counts. I just wish they'd put a little more effort into that wrap-up scene.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36489
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by Jorge »

McParadigm wrote:Avengers made the exact same "we can deliver them in equal amounts" mistake that Independence Day or Armageddon did, and sucked just as hard.
No.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36489
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by Jorge »

This movie's porn parody needs to culminate with a 20-robot gangbang.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
bart
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4133
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by bart »

This was great.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45826
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by BurtReynolds »

theplatypus wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:honestly i haven't seen it. i just wait for McP to post and then disagree with him.

no for real this time. honestly. I just cant deal with this deus ex machina bullshit anymore. How can you have any drama when the writers can just break the rules to get the hero out of a jam anytime they want? its just false. Here, its especially stupid, as its available the whole time (unless some ridiculous shit like the power being out happens or something, which is even worse). No matter how fantastic the setting, these worlds have rules.

The silly laser scene in part 2 was pretty bad (and remember, you can only use it once! for eternity it seems, as it doesnt show up at all in 3), and its repeated here a half dozen times.

the character doesn't seem to change or develop in any way that makes this movie matter. Wasnt he an alcoholic once? oh I guess he just isn't now. that might have been interesting to explore. I don't know, something. the best of these movies generally work because the main character, no matter how powerful, has some personal flaw to overcome or realization to make. Its absent here. He's just a guy who gets helped out by writers when he gets in trouble.
Spoiler: show
Nope.

Not using the "House Party protocol" earlier in the movie is justified within the story: the gate was buried under tons of rock when Stark's house was destroyed. In fact, it is referenced directly in an earlier scene, way before they're deployed: Jarvis informs Tony that "the cranes are in Malibu and the gates are being cleared as we speak", to which Tony responds "Okay, but what about the suit I'm wearing now?". It's addressed. Now, if your problem is simply that the filmmakers chose to obstruct this plot device in order to leave the most visually impressive and dramatic solution for when it will be most dramatic, aka the film's climax... uh... that's a silly criticism for a movie like this.

As far as Tony's arc, it seemed very clear to me from the get-go, and it was continuously reiterated throughout the film: the events in The Avengers, which showed him for the first time just how ridiculously outgunned he is against the superhuman threats out there, left him reeling for months. He spends his days tinkering incessantly with his suits (the suit in the Avengers is Mark 7... we're up to at least Mark 42 in this film), becoming increasingly isolated from actual human contact, alienating his friends and sabotaging his relationship. The film is about him coming to terms with the fact that the suits (or "cocoons" as he refers to it in the closing monologue) don't make the man. This is why we see him lugging it around like a crutch, and why the filmmakers chose to leave him out of his suit for most of the movie. There's a scene near the end when Tony's laying on the floor and he's staring at the Mark 42 helmet, smoldering in the fire, and that's when his epiphany happens. This is why it's so cathartic when him and Pepper embrace while all his suits self-destruct around them like fireworks. To me, it was a much more interesting arc than falling into the "Tony's a drunk" silliness from the previous film. This had already been worked out: he was self-destructing since he knew he was dying from blood poisoning. Revisiting that would've been redundant and, frankly, a little boring.

This is a pretty fantastic movie on most counts. I just wish they'd put a little more effort into that wrap-up scene.
I figured there was some explanation, weak as it is. Still, these contrivances pop up so frequently in this movie (and through each of the other three movies) its become tiresome. Here they dont even bother to hide it anymore. its gotten pretty sloppy.

Didn't Avengers already establish he is more than just a guy in armor? That he is a real hero? Feel like its already been done. And I admit i was hoping for a character to take on some more of the comic character's traits (i'm not much of a comic fan or anything, but the alcoholic thing is an interesting angle for a superhero). The silly drunkeness of the second movie could have lead to a more serious plotline in this one, but it was dropped in favor of pretty embarrassingly bad anxiety attacks.

If i agree with McP on anything, its that they need to change up the formula now, especially after The Avengers. This movie doesn't add anything to me, and you cant top the spectacle. Mandarin suggested something darker, but its a red herring. its more of the same. That was fine for me until now.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
bart
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4133
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by bart »

Yeah, the world needs another dark, brooding comic book movie.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45826
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by BurtReynolds »

bart wrote:Yeah, the world needs another dark, brooding comic book movie.
it definitely doesnt, but at least it would have been a shift. I did say last spring that I was probably done with superhero movies for awhile after The Avengers and Dark Knight Rises came out, as they were each the climax of the stories that had been coming out over the last few years. Iron Man 3 failed to convince me there was real reason to keep going.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Peeps
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7305
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by Peeps »

just saw it yesterday

as far as the mandarin goes, i freaking LOVED it. there was no way he was going to be the true mandarin of the comics without having a separate movie to explain everything he can do

RDJ freaking owned the movie and i wonder how much of his "banter" was ad libbed. when he tells the kid theres no reason to be a pussy was fucking great.

i agree with platty, the whole house party makes sense as to why it had to take time to get to.

out of the three id say this is just a hair behind the first one
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Just a bunch of well adjusted adults on an internet message board talking about comic book movies.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by McParadigm »

BurtReynolds wrote:cartoon vs. adult? rubbish. Being a lighthearted adventure movie doesn't give it the right to be dumb. Indiana Jones isn't dumb. He doesn't just produce a magic trap disarmer that he was saving for just the right moment (even though he could have used it in any of the other 50 traps he just went through).
Donkeysnart and poopycock, my good man. Your understanding of this conversation is clearly limited by the fact that you are simply a something that exists inside my internet.

I am using 'adult' to represent the more true-to-life elements of a movie...the adherence to cause-and-effect, the potential for the various choices and events surrounding a character to result in lasting consequence, the acceptance of whichever facets of reality might be relevant to the story (i.e. physics), a push for 'real to life' problems, and the tendency for characters to be something other than an archetype/set piece/unthinking punching bags. 'Cartoon,' on the other hand, represents the fantastical, the escapist, and a general simplifying of any number of qualities.

So, now that you have received this information, digital character in my internet game, reconsider your example of Indiana Jones. That film absolutely bows to the fantastical, reduce various side characters to set pieces with cartoon-villain equivalent intelligence, and allows its main hero to accomplish things that are distinctly outside of that set of structures we have identified as 'adult.'
Thats just one way they cheapen the character here. Having fifty easily destroyed Iron Mans flying around is cheap. Giving him absolutely no character development is cheap.
I fail to see how that's different from "we hate each other punch punch now we're a good team," in Avengers.
At least Avengers could hide its plot contrivances with fantastic character interactions and a genuine arch (shallow though it may have been). Is there a theme here at all? The virtues of anonymity? what is it?
Oh. Okay. There we have that.
Having him change not one single bit after Pepper dies is cheap. Getting rid of his heart thingy in 10 seconds of exposition is cheap. Its a soulless movie.
Yeah, both of those elements were very poorly done....as was the female character who originally created the...stuff. She was a plot device if ever there was one. "What are we trying to do with this scene? We'll randomly make her good or evil, depending on whatever happens to fit the moment." And, if you're going to reference the Avengers SO MUCH in the movie, you should probably toss some little line in that explains why none of them seem to give a monkey's nut about a terrorist trying to murder the president of the United States and apparently killing their teammate in the process.
A bad guy shows up, no one learns anything, a bunch of stuff blows up, good guy wins.
It's an exaggeration to say that Stark doesn't change at all during this movie...it just doesn't play out as much, because it's a continuation of the journey he began in the first one (then mostly paused for like a movie and a half). And in point of fact, they basically run this movie as him having to deal with a consequential event born out of the shittiness of what he used to be. That said, what you've written above is actually the working script for most of the movies that will grace theaters in upcoming months.
"thor graffiti'd the cartoon"? I dont know what that means.
With spatterings of the adult, little internet avatar...like an ejaculatory discharge from an unprepared and rapidly spinning masturbator. He was a distinctly 'cartoon'-ish figure in a distinctly 'cartoony' environment, but little splashes of 'adult' were applied to very effectively keep that movie from just being the corniest fucking thing you have ever seen...which it very easily could have been.
Iron Man 3 failed to convince me there was real reason to keep going.
I won't argue this one. I kinda figured the only reason NOT to end it with the Avengers culmination moment was that there was so much more money to be had. Keeping with the semen-related imagery, it's a bit like blowing your load after a very reasonable amount of time, then realizing that the old bitch is actually paying you by the stroke, so you desperately try to fix your brain on prettier things and then just keep thrusting away, praying you don't go limp because goddamn it there is MONEY at stake here.
Just a bunch of well adjusted adults on an internet message board talking about comic book movies.
You neglected to mention sexy. I'm sure you intended, or felt that it was implied. It wasn't.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Soma.
AnalLog
Posts: 1362
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:17 pm
Location: On a live wire right up off the street.

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by Soma. »

theplatypus wrote:
McParadigm wrote:Avengers made the exact same "we can deliver them in equal amounts" mistake that Independence Day or Armageddon did, and sucked just as hard.
No.
Oh.
Self wrote:Every time I get to be a bachelor, I order Chinese. Twice a year, I gorge on broccoli 'n beef and crab rangoons. The guilt reminds me of masturbation. So does the rice.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42768
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by VinylGuy »

jesus guys, you are over analyzing Iron Man 3...we really need that new pearl jam album!.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by McParadigm »

VinylGuy wrote:we really need that new pearl jam album!.
and other things nobody is saying.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45826
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by BurtReynolds »

VinylGuy wrote:jesus guys, you are over analyzing Iron Man 3...we really need that new pearl jam album!.
I get a lot more enjoyment trying to figure out what's wrong or right about these movies than the movies themselves. Its more fun.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42768
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by VinylGuy »

BurtReynolds wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:jesus guys, you are over analyzing Iron Man 3...we really need that new pearl jam album!.
I get a lot more enjoyment trying to figure out what's wrong or right about these movies than the movies themselves. Its more fun.
Really? you have more fun that way? I just...i wanna hug you. Everything gonna be allright, friend..
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45826
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by BurtReynolds »

VinylGuy wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:jesus guys, you are over analyzing Iron Man 3...we really need that new pearl jam album!.
I get a lot more enjoyment trying to figure out what's wrong or right about these movies than the movies themselves. Its more fun.

Really? you have more fun that way? I just...i wanna hug you. Everything gonna be allright, friend..



Its like ajigsaw puzzle, only people end up with different images. And if it's not the same one as me, the WRONG image!
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
MadTIGERmaN
AnalLog
Posts: 1646
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:12 am
Location: The Jungle

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by MadTIGERmaN »

I can except the "house party protocol" not being used till the end
I still can not except that SHIELD was not the ones digging out that house / guarding the armor. They were all up in Tonys business when he lost control in 2, but NO EXPLANATION to why their no where to be seen in 3? especially after the Avengers? is pretty lame.

That end sequence of "oh yeah I got the metal in my chest taken out" was really lame too.

Other than that its a fine summer block buster bang em up / explode things / witty one liners movie.


oh, and the people on other boards that are seriously saying this movie is better than the Avengers need to stop trying to be cool by saying somethings better than the Avengers simply to try and say somethings better than the Avengers? If anything this movies biggest weakness is that they tried to make the final battle as grand as the Avengers.


Im ready for The Wolverine (see any of you who want to talk mutant in the X-thread :twisted: )
User avatar
griffinxi
A Return To Form
Posts: 168
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:46 pm

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by griffinxi »

I thought this movie was a lot of fun. Annoyances:

1) I'm not sure I understand the arc reactor's role in powering/failing to power the suit anymore-- it seemed Tony was in dire need of jumper cables.

and

2) Trying to figure out if there wasn't a better way to combine The Mandarin/Extremis angles into a single story that wasn't quite so...heretical. It seems they simply smashed the two characters together, which, while a gutsy move on Marvel's part, leaves me a little puzzled. I love the idea of a bait-and-switch, but probably would have preferred if it was revealed that Aldritch Killian wasn't Aldritch Killian at all-- sure, he says "I'm the Mandarin!" and has dragon tattoos, but it seems he's only talking about philosophy. It would've been cool to have the Killian identity revealed to have been literally false-- a Keyser Soze-type moment.

Otherwise, this was a ton of fun.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by McParadigm »

griffinxi wrote:1) I'm not sure I understand the arc reactor's role in powering/failing to power the suit anymore-- it seemed Tony was in dire need of jumper cables.
That is pretty funny, yeah. I have no background whatsoever in comic books, so I totally forget the chest thing altogether every time its not on screen, but now that you mention it...
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Peeps
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7305
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm

Re: Movie: Iron Man 3 (05-03-13)

Post by Peeps »

MadTIGERmaN wrote:I can except the "house party protocol" not being used till the end
I still can not except that SHIELD was not the ones digging out that house / guarding the armor. They were all up in Tonys business when he lost control in 2, but NO EXPLANATION to why their no where to be seen in 3? especially after the Avengers? is pretty lame.

That end sequence of "oh yeah I got the metal in my chest taken out" was really lame too.

Other than that its a fine summer block buster bang em up / explode things / witty one liners movie.


oh, and the people on other boards that are seriously saying this movie is better than the Avengers need to stop trying to be cool by saying somethings better than the Avengers simply to try and say somethings better than the Avengers? If anything this movies biggest weakness is that they tried to make the final battle as grand as the Avengers.


Im ready for The Wolverine (see any of you who want to talk mutant in the X-thread :twisted: )
i cant accept you dont know the difference between accept and except....
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
Post Reply