Jurassic World
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: Jurassic World
I can't believe they tricked us into a reboot without it being an actual reboot
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35446
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: Jurassic World
wow, fuck this movie. chris pratt's last line was pure andy dwyer and it wasn't supposed to be.
- darth_vedder
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6467
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm
Re: Jurassic World
ligbhkdsjfa;lskdf;bAOUWhnz:dfouhslakjfhaifov;UWHAV"Eodsuhfg;lkjashfliuwANROUGhouawsfr'9rwapit'p93qi0ijos;eizfdjl;skfxgznv
- Dev
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:46 pm
Re: Jurassic World
this movie was exactly what i expected. i think it was pretty solid for what it was
AMAB
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33835
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Jurassic World
wtfDev wrote:this movie was exactly what i expected. i think it was pretty solid for what it was
- Dev
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:46 pm
Re: Jurassic World
not a great movie, but good for a blockbusterLoathedVermin72 wrote:wtfDev wrote:this movie was exactly what i expected. i think it was pretty solid for what it was
AMAB
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33835
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Jurassic World
Is there anything specific you enjoyed about it?Dev wrote:not a great movie, but good for a blockbusterLoathedVermin72 wrote:wtfDev wrote:this movie was exactly what i expected. i think it was pretty solid for what it was
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Jurassic World
The only possible human answer is 'no.'LoathedVermin72 wrote:Is there anything specific you enjoyed about it?Dev wrote:not a great movie, but good for a blockbusterLoathedVermin72 wrote:wtfDev wrote:this movie was exactly what i expected. i think it was pretty solid for what it was
(patriotic choking noises)
- Dev
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:46 pm
Re: Jurassic World
i liked bryce and chris's dynamic, and was reasonably entertainedLoathedVermin72 wrote:Is there anything specific you enjoyed about it?Dev wrote:not a great movie, but good for a blockbusterLoathedVermin72 wrote:wtfDev wrote:this movie was exactly what i expected. i think it was pretty solid for what it was
Last edited by Dev on Tue July 14, 2015 5:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
AMAB
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33835
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Jurassic World
Huh. I'm not being hyperbolic when I say I have literally never liked a movie less than this.
- Dev
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:46 pm
Re: Jurassic World
what would be interesting is if we could break down all the compounding factors that lead you to your crazy judgments.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Huh. I'm not being hyperbolic when I say I have literally never liked a movie less than this.
actually can you explain?
AMAB
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33835
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Jurassic World
Ha, this is gonna be a long post…Dev wrote:what would be interesting is if we could break down all the compounding factors that lead you to your crazy judgments.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Huh. I'm not being hyperbolic when I say I have literally never liked a movie less than this.
actually can you explain?
Well, let me first approach it structurally, as a blockbuster. I love blockbusters. Some of my favorite movies are blockbusters. I love the spectacle, the grand scale, the way you can see on screen how much money and effort was put into a well-made one. But I especially love well-crafted pacing and structure in blockbusters. The slower, the better for me. And this is one of the most poorly structured blockbusters I’ve ever seen. On the surface level, the pacing is a mess. It moves way too quickly, and doesn’t allow you time to become acclimated to the world and atmosphere, which is essential to a good blockbuster. Build-up is important, and all the best blockbusters know it. It doesn’t even build-up to dinosaur reveals, which is a breach Spielberg never committed in either of his JP movies – we are steeped in dino imagery from the get-go. They overwhelm the movie’s aesthetic. Raptors, which were a hugely threatening presence in the original film, are just commonplace pets now. There’s no danger anymore; the mystery is stripped away.
But the terrible structure also extends to the movie’s themes and character development. Nothing about the teenage brothers makes any sense; their characterization is maybe the worst I’ve ever seen in a film. The older brother is really into girls. The movie really hammers this down our throats in the first half; all he ever does is check out girls and act shy around them. But where does this go? How does it pay off? What does it tell us about him as a character or about his relationship with his brother? That he’s more interested in girls than his family? That he’s self-involved? Because that goes out the window as soon as the dinosaur action hits and is then never revisited. So what’s the point of spending so much time on it? What does it have to do with anything?
Why is there literally one scene when the younger brother breaks down about how he thinks his parents are getting a divorce? That was never alluded to previously, and is never referenced again. It says nothing about any of the characters. It’s meaningless thematically. And it doesn’t even jell with what we see of the parents: there is never any hint of discord in the brief moments we see them together.
Why is Bryce Dallas Howard’s character treated like some kind of negligent jerk for not being involved with her nephews? How insane is it that she is chastised for something stupid like not knowing their birthdays (Who the fuck remembers the birthdays of their extended family members?!)? Everything about her characterization is massively sexist and nonsensical. She essentially operates the coolest resort on the planet. How is that not an awesome job? How doesn’t anyone seem to respect that she is dedicated to her work? Why does the movie constantly rebuke her for basically just caring about her job? No male character in her position would be treated that way unless he were characterized as a slimy sociopath. It’s idiotic. Why does Chris Pratt’s character (who is not related to the brothers in any way) always wind up being the cool hero while she gets condescending joke-valiant moments?
- Spoiler: show
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: Jurassic World
but it had dinosaurs in it....
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: Jurassic World
"but it had transformers in it..."bada wrote:but it had dinosaurs in it....
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: Jurassic World
did you go to the bathroom during the scenes where they were very close to eating the guy that fell into the habitat and tore apart an InGen strike team?Raptors, which were a hugely threatening presence in the original film, are just commonplace pets now. There’s no danger anymore; the mystery is stripped away.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33835
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Jurassic World
You mean the scene right before they were talked down by their trainer? And right after they were being trained by their trainer? And the scene that is super early in the movie and had no build-up?Mecca wrote:did you go to the bathroom during the scenes where they were very close to eating the guy that fell into the habitat and tore apart an InGen strike team?Raptors, which were a hugely threatening presence in the original film, are just commonplace pets now. There’s no danger anymore; the mystery is stripped away.
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: Jurassic World
not to FJM your entire post but
The parents obviously had some acrimony when sending the kids off and made comments like "lets just get through this," so it was previously alluded to, but it doesn't really pay off because the kids being in mortal danger brings them back together apparently.Why is there literally one scene when the younger brother breaks down about how he thinks his parents are getting a divorce? That was never alluded to previously, and is never referenced again. It says nothing about any of the characters. It’s meaningless thematically. And it doesn’t even jell with what we see of the parents: there is never any hint of discord in the brief moments we see them together.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33835
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Jurassic World
Extrapolating kid-stress comments like that to marital acrimony is a bit of a stretch.Mecca wrote:not to FJM your entire post but
The parents obviously had some acrimony when sending the kids off and made comments like "lets just get through this," so it was previously alluded to, but it doesn't really pay off because the kids being in mortal danger brings them back together apparently.Why is there literally one scene when the younger brother breaks down about how he thinks his parents are getting a divorce? That was never alluded to previously, and is never referenced again. It says nothing about any of the characters. It’s meaningless thematically. And it doesn’t even jell with what we see of the parents: there is never any hint of discord in the brief moments we see them together.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Jurassic World
Was there an after-credits scene? If so, what happened? I didn't stick around.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
