Too soon.MattA75 wrote:the pressure cooker...
Boston Red Sox Thread
- Self
- Polluted
- Posts: 4644
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
- Location: PM me, I have everything.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
-
MattA75
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I realized that as I wrote it, and then I figured I just didn't care...I still can't believe people got as butthurt as they did over that sign last nightSelf wrote:Too soon.MattA75 wrote:the pressure cooker...
- Self
- Polluted
- Posts: 4644
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
- Location: PM me, I have everything.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I'm really hard to offend, and I wasn't offended. But, I can kinda sympathize with those that were. The whole "Boston Strong" thing has nothing to do with sports.MattA75 wrote:I realized that as I wrote it, and then I figured I just didn't care...I still can't believe people got as butthurt as they did over that sign last nightSelf wrote:Too soon.MattA75 wrote:the pressure cooker...
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
they traded for both guys and signed uehara (because they felt they could afford it.MattA75 wrote:They signed a guy who is always injured (Bailey) who, SHOCKER, is injured again, after spending most of last year on the DL.elliseamos wrote:the point is the sox are rid of crawford (your second complaint) and can afford two good pitchers for the price of your binky (papelbon, your first complaint). therefore, they're a better team than they were and are proving it in the standings (for now).MattA75 wrote:way to avoid the question...elliseamos wrote:the team's 10 games over .500, i'll take that everyday.MattA75 wrote:but paying Bailey and Hanrahan 11.1 million combined makes some sort of sense?elliseamos wrote:Me too, bc a closer isn't worth that much.MattA75 wrote:So glad we decided Papelbon wasn't worth 12-13 million a year, but thought John Lackey was worth 18, and Carl Crawford was worth 22...
boom roasted.
They then traded for a guy with no AL experience to close out games in one of the two biggest markets there is, who has sucked all year and now he's hurt too.
Sounds like the old Harry Sinden "well, two $3 million players are better than one $6 million player" theory...and it's working out about as well for them as it did for ole Harry
bailey ($4.2M) - 12.1 IP, 14.59 K/9, 1.80 FIP
hanrahan ($7M) - 7.1 IP, 6.14 K/9, 11.20 FIP
uehara ($4.1M) - 13.2 IP, 11.20 K/9, 3.82 FIP
i'd take these 3 guys at $15M over: papelbon ($13M) - 12 IP, 5.25 K/9, 3.18 FIP
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
They can afford to do just about anything they want, Papelbon is a proven closer, which there are VERY few of in MLB. They were looking for a closer for about 15 years before they had Papelbon and will probably be searching for another 15 for the next one.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
lets all just agree that no one ever wants to see Hanrahan again.
-
MattA75
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
yeah, thisnumbers wrote:They can afford to do just about anything they want, Papelbon is a proven closer, which there are VERY few of in MLB. They were looking for a closer for about 15 years before they had Papelbon and will probably be searching for another 15 for the next one.
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Casey Janssen isn't really a proven closer, and even if money weren't an issue I would take him over Papelbon every single time. I just want the pitcher who's most likely to get batters out.MattA75 wrote:yeah, thisnumbers wrote:They can afford to do just about anything they want, Papelbon is a proven closer, which there are VERY few of in MLB. They were looking for a closer for about 15 years before they had Papelbon and will probably be searching for another 15 for the next one.
-
MattA75
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
but closers don't operate in a vacuum which is why intangibles have to come into play...it takes a special kind of guy to close in Boston with the scrutiny of fans and press being what it is, and it takes a REALLY special guy to embrace that job for any length of time. Papelbon did all of that. AND he wasn't a dink, unlike 75% of the roster at the time he left.philpritchard wrote:Casey Janssen isn't really a proven closer, and even if money weren't an issue I would take him over Papelbon every single time. I just want the pitcher who's most likely to get batters out.MattA75 wrote:yeah, thisnumbers wrote:They can afford to do just about anything they want, Papelbon is a proven closer, which there are VERY few of in MLB. They were looking for a closer for about 15 years before they had Papelbon and will probably be searching for another 15 for the next one.
And maybe Casey Janssen could do all of that...maybe he couldn't. We'll probably never know and never get to find out. But I KNOW Papelbon could and did.
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
i'll give you the point about the front office undervaluing their own and overvaluing another team's player, but i stand by the business decision to bet on 3 pitchers rather than 1 (for $2M more).
-
MattA75
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I'm not against signing Uehara, I would've been for that signing WITH Papelbon...so my argument would be Papelbon/Uehara > Bailey/Hanrahan/Uehara.elliseamos wrote:i'll give you the point about the front office undervaluing their own and overvaluing another team's player, but i stand by the business decision to bet on 3 pitchers rather than 1 (for $2M more).
Either way, if Bailey can't stay on the field and Hanrahan continues to blow (when he gets back), this team needs at least one more reliever for the late innings, because they're going to kill Uehara before too long here
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
but the point is that they go cheaper than Uehara if they have Pap. so you're equation sucks. i think the starter tonight, webster, should be in the pen where he can hurl 100MPH steamers at folks... like that guy we used to know named Bard, don't forget that mistake.MattA75 wrote:I'm not against signing Uehara, I would've been for that signing WITH Papelbon...so my argument would be Papelbon/Uehara > Bailey/Hanrahan/Uehara.elliseamos wrote:i'll give you the point about the front office undervaluing their own and overvaluing another team's player, but i stand by the business decision to bet on 3 pitchers rather than 1 (for $2M more).
Either way, if Bailey can't stay on the field and Hanrahan continues to blow (when he gets back), this team needs at least one more reliever for the late innings, because they're going to kill Uehara before too long here
-
MattA75
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
my equation doesn't suck, how they spend money suckselliseamos wrote:but the point is that they go cheaper than Uehara if they have Pap. so you're equation sucks. i think the starter tonight, webster, should be in the pen where he can hurl 100MPH steamers at folks... like that guy we used to know named Bard, don't forget that mistake.MattA75 wrote:I'm not against signing Uehara, I would've been for that signing WITH Papelbon...so my argument would be Papelbon/Uehara > Bailey/Hanrahan/Uehara.elliseamos wrote:i'll give you the point about the front office undervaluing their own and overvaluing another team's player, but i stand by the business decision to bet on 3 pitchers rather than 1 (for $2M more).
Either way, if Bailey can't stay on the field and Hanrahan continues to blow (when he gets back), this team needs at least one more reliever for the late innings, because they're going to kill Uehara before too long here
-
MattA75
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
they need to invest in a medical staff that knows what the hell they're doing
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
yeah, seems kinda funny considering the reputation of Boston Hospitals.MattA75 wrote:they need to invest in a medical staff that knows what the hell they're doing
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
how many injured guys have they acquired in the last few years? It's insane. Gonzasshole, Crawford, Lackey, Hanrahan, that dude they got for Theo, I'm sure there's a couple I've missed too. Not to mention their mis-diagnoses of multiple players injurys, when they though Ellsbury had bruised ribs when he had like 3 broken ribs or something. They said Buchholz had a like back sprain or something when he had a broken vertebrae.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Yeah it's pretty absurd.
-
MattA75
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Don't forget Bobby Jenks!
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
yeah, the bullpen has been horrible since the likes of embree and tomlin left town. maybe they'll make some moves to bring in help rather than continuing the cheap route.MattA75 wrote:Don't forget Bobby Jenks!
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
one ringy dingyelliseamos wrote:yeah, the bullpen has been horrible since the likes of embree and tomlin left town. maybe they'll make some moves to bring in help rather than continuing the cheap route.MattA75 wrote:Don't forget Bobby Jenks!