Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #1: Vitalogy

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
chewm
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4401
Joined: Fri July 26, 2013 12:34 am
Location: chewm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by chewm »

Done.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

chewm wrote:Done.
Your answers are invalid until you change your avatar back.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by Norah »

I love chewm's current avatar.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by stip »

I ranged from 20 to 3.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Also, I see you went against my perfect ranking system, 4/5. If I ever see you out on the water I'm going to cut you off of a wave.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6985
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by 4/5 »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Also, I see you went against my perfect ranking system, 4/5. If I ever see you out on the water I'm going to cut you off of a wave.
That won't be hard to do. We'll have a great time after that, though.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by epilogue »

cutuphalfdead wrote:I love chewm's current avatar.
+1
chewm
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4401
Joined: Fri July 26, 2013 12:34 am
Location: chewm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by chewm »

It's wonderful!
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36492
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by Jorge »

cutuphalfdead wrote:I love chewm's current avatar.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by epilogue »

theplatypus wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I love chewm's current avatar.
Well, of course you do. He's your account.
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11808
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by The Argonaut »

I went from 17 points to 1 point.
Please consider voting for me
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by epilogue »

The Argonaut wrote:I went from 17 points to 1 point.
Impressive.

I went from 16 to 4. But even my least favorite Pearl Jam album has stuff on it that I love and adore. I felt like an asshole traitor going below 6.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36492
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by Jorge »

30 to 0 here, where 0 represents an album I'm entirely comfortable never listening to again, and 30 is one of my all-time favorites (not just PJ).
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16264
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by Birds in Hell »

This took me way too long to complete.

I am not good with numbers.

("94? How does it add up to 94? Okay, try again...102?! AUUUGGHHH" and so on.)
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by BurtReynolds »

theplatypus wrote:30 to 0 here, where 0 represents an album I'm entirely comfortable never listening to again, and 30 is one of my all-time favorites (not just PJ).
I gave No Code 30 and Lightning Bolt 1, but there is no way 30 LBs make one No Code.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16264
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by Birds in Hell »

I gave five albums an equal score.
chewm
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4401
Joined: Fri July 26, 2013 12:34 am
Location: chewm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by chewm »

durdencommatyler wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I love chewm's current avatar.
Well, of course you do. He's your account.
:o
chewm
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4401
Joined: Fri July 26, 2013 12:34 am
Location: chewm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by chewm »

durdencommatyler wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:I went from 17 points to 1 point.
Impressive.

I went from 16 to 4. But even my least favorite Pearl Jam album has stuff on it that I love and adore. I felt like an asshole traitor going below 6.
From 16 to 4 for me too.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16264
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by Birds in Hell »

15 x 5, 9, 6, 6, 2, 2.

(Dear god, don't tell me I still got it wrong.)
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by Kevin Davis »

Birds in Hell wrote:I gave five albums an equal score.
I gave three albums an equal score, and then two other albums a different equal score. My total span was 17 to 3. I'm sure I could get by without ever hearing my least favorite PJ album again, but I also know that as soon as it was taken from my life completely, I would immediately become singularly obsessed with wanting to hear it again. Go figure -- I really like this band.
Post Reply