Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #1: Vitalogy

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36492
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by Jorge »

Birds in Hell wrote:15 x 5, 9, 9, 6, 2, 2.

(Dear god, don't tell me I still got it wrong.)
That comes out to 103. Do it again.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16264
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by Birds in Hell »

theplatypus wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:15 x 5, 9, 9, 6, 2, 2.

(Dear god, don't tell me I still got it wrong.)
That comes out to 103. Do it again.
You made me check, just to make sure.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

I went from 40 to 0, but I didn't necessarily allocate points based on quality.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 02, 2026 10:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by BurtReynolds »

tragabigzanda wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
theplatypus wrote:30 to 0 here, where 0 represents an album I'm entirely comfortable never listening to again, and 30 is one of my all-time favorites (not just PJ).
I gave No Code 30 and Lightning Bolt 1, but there is no way 30 LBs make one No Code.
This sounds about right, so I believe I'll skip this exercise.
Should have probably just given it a 0. I shitty album is pretty much infinitely worse than a good one.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by PHATJ »

Done. Ranged from 20-0. Fuck Backspacer.
User avatar
LikeLukin
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 384
Joined: Tue June 25, 2013 5:59 pm
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Contact:

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by LikeLukin »

PHATJ wrote:Done. Ranged from 20-0. Fuck Backspacer.
:hooray:
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6985
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by 4/5 »

Bump.

Keep it coming, the more responses, the better!
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
BigRedLedbetter
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5401
Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by BigRedLedbetter »

cutuphalfdead wrote:no
durdencommatyler wrote:YES

I would totally listen to a podcast with you two. :haha:
PHATJ wrote:Done. Ranged from 20-0. Fuck Backspacer.
I like this idea.
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by stip »

What most people don't realize is that this was an idea almost two years in the making...
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

stip wrote:What most people don't realize is that this was an idea almost two years in the making...
And that I fought it the whole way in the mod forum.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by Norah »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
stip wrote:What most people don't realize is that this was an idea almost two years in the making...
And that I fought it the whole way in the mod forum.
Team Rudd.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by epilogue »

Calm down guys. It's just for shits.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

durdencommatyler wrote:Calm down guys. It's just for shits.
wrong thread, joey.

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtop ... =10&t=6467
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by epilogue »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Calm down guys. It's just for shits.
wrong thread, joey.

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtop ... =10&t=6467
You're alright, Ruddock.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Calm down guys. It's just for shits.
wrong thread, joey.

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtop ... =10&t=6467
You're alright, Ruddock.
Rank the times I haven't been alright.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by epilogue »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Calm down guys. It's just for shits.
wrong thread, joey.

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtop ... =10&t=6467
You're alright, Ruddock.
Rank the times I haven't been alright.
Better yet, I'll have RM do it for me. Weighted.

PM me your lists, RM!
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11808
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by The Argonaut »

i don't understand the resistance.
Please consider voting for me
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by epilogue »

The Argonaut wrote:i don't understand the resistance.
Me either, friend.
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted!

Post by tommymtcom »

Resistance is futile.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
Post Reply