Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 02, 2026 10:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by EJ »

Cool, thanks trab!

I've only been through it once, and didn't find it drastically transformed, just a few subtleties here and there. There's still some of that obnxious shrill with some of the guitars - but, I guess you can't completely polish a turd. That being said, I wasn't close to suffering a migraine after listening to this new mix.

I'll give it some more listens. I applaud the effort to try to tame this beast.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by epilogue »

Listen on headphones. It's remarkable how much easier it is on the ears.
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by EJ »

durdencommatyler wrote:Listen on headphones. It's remarkable how much easier it is on the ears.
Oh, I did. Its definitely easier on the ears, I think I was just expecting much more.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by epilogue »

EJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Listen on headphones. It's remarkable how much easier it is on the ears.
Oh, I did. Its definitely easier on the ears, I think I was just expecting much more.
Gotcha.

It sounded remarkably different to me. I mean, for as limited as this kind of thing can be. I don't feel the songs in my fillings anymore.
User avatar
hlniv
Future Drummer
Posts: 3098
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by hlniv »

what is the technique behind this magical transformation?

The end of big wave into gone is actually a highlight of the album now, I used to have to tense up my brain muscles to avoid not vomiting during the intro to
Gone.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by Jorge »

EJ wrote:Cool, thanks trab!

I've only been through it once, and didn't find it drastically transformed, just a few subtleties here and there. There's still some of that obnxious shrill with some of the guitars - but, I guess you can't completely polish a turd. That being said, I wasn't close to suffering a migraine after listening to this new mix.

I'll give it some more listens. I applaud the effort to try to tame this beast.
Yeah, my main takeaway from listening to this "remaster" is that I just don't really like most of these songs
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
XWayne
A Return To Form
Posts: 116
Joined: Sun January 06, 2013 2:21 pm
Location: Paris, FR

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by XWayne »

hlniv wrote:what is the technique behind this magical transformation?

The end of big wave into gone is actually a highlight of the album now, I used to have to tense up my brain muscles to avoid not vomiting during the intro to
Gone.
I was wondering the same thing: is it possible to correct a commercial release, or has BrickwallHater managed to get the unmastered tracks? Also, is there an artefact / sound glitch at the very end of Inside Job for everyone?

I rediscover the Avocado with this release, and it feels like the mastering had ruined the album for me, there is more depth and subtleties than just a RAWK sound stuck in the red.
User avatar
ridleybradout
Future Drummer
Posts: 2551
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:33 pm
Location: Rand McNally

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by ridleybradout »

XWayne wrote:
hlniv wrote:what is the technique behind this magical transformation?

The end of big wave into gone is actually a highlight of the album now, I used to have to tense up my brain muscles to avoid not vomiting during the intro to
Gone.
I was wondering the same thing: is it possible to correct a commercial release, or has BrickwallHater managed to get the unmastered tracks? Also, is there an artefact / sound glitch at the very end of Inside Job for everyone?
Short answer - yes, he has corrected the commercial release to increase the dynamic range.

And yes, there is an unfortunate glitch at the end of Inside Job (and the 'hidden' instrumental bit has been removed).
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by McParadigm »

Longer answer: no. Dynamic loss is not "hidden" somewhere in a brick walled file. It's lost. You need the original audio to work with. But there are very powerful tools for mimicking it.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
LetMeSleep
Posting (live)
Posts: 17987
Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Scooby Doo

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by LetMeSleep »

There are no tools to take the egg out of a baked cake.

I eagerly await a reissue and hope that the band do the right thing with the remaster. In fact I'd be happier with a another mixing session overall.
User avatar
William Bloke
Future Drummer
Posts: 2687
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 9:20 am
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Great southern land.

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by William Bloke »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:I think AR, WWS, and Parachutes benefit the most from this
Parachutes would best benefit by being left off entirely.
User avatar
hlniv
Future Drummer
Posts: 3098
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by hlniv »

Varis wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I think AR, WWS, and Parachutes benefit the most from this
Parachutes would best benefit by being left off entirely.
:shock:

Meaning the album would be better without it? Or that it would be perceived better without all the shitty songs around it on the same album?

Because, this has always been a highlight of the album for me...
User avatar
XWayne
A Return To Form
Posts: 116
Joined: Sun January 06, 2013 2:21 pm
Location: Paris, FR

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by XWayne »

Slightly off-topic: BrickwallHater has recently released a remaster of the Ten Remix. It can now be listened on the same level as the original issue of Ten.

Code: Select all

foobar2000 1.3.8 / Dynamic Range Meter 1.1.1
log date: 2015-07-27 12:56:37

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analyzed: Pearl Jam / Ten Remix
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DR         Peak         RMS     Duration Track
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DR6        0.00 dB    -7.87 dB      3:52 01-Once (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR7        0.00 dB    -7.30 dB      4:53 02-Even Flow (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6        0.00 dB    -7.28 dB      5:41 03-Alive (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6        0.00 dB    -6.60 dB      3:19 04-Why Go (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6        0.00 dB    -7.19 dB      5:39 05-Black (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6        0.00 dB    -7.18 dB      5:17 06-Jeremy (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR7        0.00 dB    -8.45 dB      2:41 07-Oceans (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6        0.00 dB    -6.94 dB      3:30 08-Porch (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6        0.00 dB    -7.79 dB      4:58 09-Garden (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6        0.00 dB    -7.10 dB      4:18 10-Deep (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6        0.00 dB   -10.00 dB      8:59 11-Release (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Number of tracks:  11
Official DR value: DR6

Samplerate:        44100 Hz
Channels:          2
Bits per sample:   16
Bitrate:           862 kbps
Codec:             FLAC
================================================================================

Code: Select all

foobar2000 1.3.8 / Dynamic Range Meter 1.1.1
log date: 2015-07-27 12:57:15

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analyzed: Pearl Jam / Ten Remix (BrickwallHater Remaster)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DR         Peak         RMS     Duration Track
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DR12      -1.52 dB   -16.05 dB      3:52 01-01 - Once (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR12      -2.49 dB   -15.17 dB      4:53 02-02 - Even Flow (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR12      -1.86 dB   -15.43 dB      5:41 03-03 - Alive (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR13      -0.36 dB   -14.28 dB      3:19 04-04 - Why Go (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR13      -0.36 dB   -15.26 dB      5:39 05-05 - Black (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR13      -0.36 dB   -15.02 dB      5:17 06-06 - Jeremy (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR11      -3.93 dB   -16.92 dB      2:41 07-07 - Oceans (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR13      -0.36 dB   -15.08 dB      3:30 08-08 - Porch (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR13      -0.36 dB   -15.85 dB      4:58 09-09 - Garden (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR13      -0.75 dB   -15.18 dB      4:18 10-10 - Deep (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR12      -2.10 dB   -18.33 dB      8:59 11-11 - Release (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Number of tracks:  11
Official DR value: DR12

Samplerate:        44100 Hz
Channels:          2
Bits per sample:   16
Bitrate:           740 kbps
Codec:             FLAC
================================================================================
User avatar
LetMeSleep
Posting (live)
Posts: 17987
Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Scooby Doo

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by LetMeSleep »

Varis wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I think AR, WWS, and Parachutes benefit the most from this
Parachutes would best benefit by being left off entirely.
I'll keep sending the frogs until you change your tune, V.
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by evenslow »

XWayne wrote:Slightly off-topic: BrickwallHater has recently released a remaster of the Ten Remix. It can now be listened on the same level as the original issue of Ten.

Code: Select all

foobar2000 1.3.8 / Dynamic Range Meter 1.1.1
log date: 2015-07-27 12:56:37

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analyzed: Pearl Jam / Ten Remix
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DR         Peak         RMS     Duration Track
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DR6        0.00 dB    -7.87 dB      3:52 01-Once (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR7        0.00 dB    -7.30 dB      4:53 02-Even Flow (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6        0.00 dB    -7.28 dB      5:41 03-Alive (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6        0.00 dB    -6.60 dB      3:19 04-Why Go (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6        0.00 dB    -7.19 dB      5:39 05-Black (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6        0.00 dB    -7.18 dB      5:17 06-Jeremy (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR7        0.00 dB    -8.45 dB      2:41 07-Oceans (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6        0.00 dB    -6.94 dB      3:30 08-Porch (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6        0.00 dB    -7.79 dB      4:58 09-Garden (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6        0.00 dB    -7.10 dB      4:18 10-Deep (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6        0.00 dB   -10.00 dB      8:59 11-Release (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Number of tracks:  11
Official DR value: DR6

Samplerate:        44100 Hz
Channels:          2
Bits per sample:   16
Bitrate:           862 kbps
Codec:             FLAC
================================================================================

Code: Select all

foobar2000 1.3.8 / Dynamic Range Meter 1.1.1
log date: 2015-07-27 12:57:15

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analyzed: Pearl Jam / Ten Remix (BrickwallHater Remaster)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DR         Peak         RMS     Duration Track
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DR12      -1.52 dB   -16.05 dB      3:52 01-01 - Once (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR12      -2.49 dB   -15.17 dB      4:53 02-02 - Even Flow (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR12      -1.86 dB   -15.43 dB      5:41 03-03 - Alive (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR13      -0.36 dB   -14.28 dB      3:19 04-04 - Why Go (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR13      -0.36 dB   -15.26 dB      5:39 05-05 - Black (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR13      -0.36 dB   -15.02 dB      5:17 06-06 - Jeremy (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR11      -3.93 dB   -16.92 dB      2:41 07-07 - Oceans (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR13      -0.36 dB   -15.08 dB      3:30 08-08 - Porch (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR13      -0.36 dB   -15.85 dB      4:58 09-09 - Garden (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR13      -0.75 dB   -15.18 dB      4:18 10-10 - Deep (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR12      -2.10 dB   -18.33 dB      8:59 11-11 - Release (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Number of tracks:  11
Official DR value: DR12

Samplerate:        44100 Hz
Channels:          2
Bits per sample:   16
Bitrate:           740 kbps
Codec:             FLAC
================================================================================
Any discernible difference, good or bad?
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by Kevin Davis »

Why would one "unremaster" an album that is already available in its original, unremastered form?

I admire this guy's mission statement but his work does not interest me. Just seems like the sort of thing you couldn't begin to do correctly without access to the masters.
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by evenslow »

Kevin Davis wrote:Why would one "unremaster" an album that is already available in its original, unremastered form?

I admire this guy's mission statement but his work does not interest me. Just seems like the sort of thing you couldn't begin to do correctly without access to the masters.
I'm guessing it's more like he took away the "brickwall" effect from Brendan O'Brien's remix. So, you would get the benefit of the lack of reverb without all the brickwalling.

Or I could be totally wrong.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by Norah »

Kevin Davis wrote:
I admire this guy's mission statement but his work does not interest me. Just seems like the sort of thing you couldn't begin to do correctly without access to the masters.
Pretty much how I feel about all this.
Last edited by Norah on Sat August 15, 2015 4:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam

Post by Kevin Davis »

evenslow wrote:
Kevin Davis wrote:Why would one "unremaster" an album that is already available in its original, unremastered form?

I admire this guy's mission statement but his work does not interest me. Just seems like the sort of thing you couldn't begin to do correctly without access to the masters.
I'm guessing it's more like he took away the "brickwall" effect from Brendan O'Brien's remix. So, you would get the benefit of the lack of reverb without all the brickwalling.

Or I could be totally wrong.
Oh, gotcha -- I had missed that it was the remixed version.
Post Reply