E.H. Ruddock wrote:Good lord, stip4/5 wrote:10.
One user ranked it 4th overall, giving it the highest peak ranking of the final three albums.
I was the top placement for L-bolt, too
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Good lord, stip4/5 wrote:10.
One user ranked it 4th overall, giving it the highest peak ranking of the final three albums.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Definitely. A lot of fun. Thanks.theplatypus wrote:This is great, 4/5.

For true.cutuphalfdead wrote:Rename this thread Data Points: Confirming the Obvious
Based on LB bested BS by 1 vote and their scores were 3.33 to 3.30, I believe the score was 110 to 109 and there were 33 surveys.Kevin Davis wrote:How many total surveys, 4/5?
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
You're a wizard.CopperTom wrote:Based on LB bested BS by 1 vote and their scores were 3.33 to 3.30, I believe the score was 110 to 109 and there were 33 surveys.Kevin Davis wrote:How many total surveys, 4/5?
Not based on the information provided.stip wrote:Can you provide the median and mode?
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
Yeah but you skewed the whole "only album not to get a top five" with your bullshit Backspacer rating.stip wrote:I was not the person who gave S/T a 10, btw.
It definitely was.Tj wrote:In fact I rated Ten ahead of Backspacer cause it felt like the right thing to do. It clearly wasn't.
Look, I'm a huge fan of backspacer and even I think that's nuts.Birds in Hell wrote:It definitely was.Tj wrote:In fact I rated Ten ahead of Backspacer cause it felt like the right thing to do. It clearly wasn't.
stip wrote:Look, I'm a huge fan of backspacer and even I think that's nuts.Birds in Hell wrote:It definitely was.Tj wrote:In fact I rated Ten ahead of Backspacer cause it felt like the right thing to do. It clearly wasn't.
Having said that, ten will almost certainly end up criminally underrated due to the statistically anomalously high concentration of idiots in our sample