Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #1: Vitalogy
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 24953
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
Vs. as low as 9? I can take being mocked as the example of idiotic posting, but this is going too far. I quit RM!
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- The Argonaut
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11809
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
- Location: in the air tonight
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #7: Riot Act
4/5 wrote:Yes you did, and I did record your score correctly, so all the averages are correct. I must have missed it when I glanced through the scores looking for the second highest.The Argonaut wrote:I gave Vs. 17 points4/5 wrote: The highest score it received was 40 points. (15 points was next highest)
Vs. got my top spot, I'm not surprised to see it in sixth, though. There are skips on this album, but it has high highs and holds a special place in my heart.
Please consider voting for me
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
B, this is going to get worse before it gets better.
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
-
digster
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
Yeah...I can't really speak to older versions of the song, and how those played in the room, but when I saw them do Indifference, it just seemed so, for lack of a better term, deflated. It just doesn't seem to work as a closer, at least in the way they want it to.4/5 wrote:Man I used to love Indifference so much...and then I saw it live...with the lights on...and that song has just never been the same for me.stip wrote:Elderly Woman, too!ridleybradout wrote:I had Vs a reluctant 5th with 13pts, but only 2pts behind my top. There are so many top tier songs on this: plus it just sounds FIERCE:
Go
Animal
Daughter
Rearviewmirror
Indifference
that's a top 6 that will stack against any record, including Ten and Vitalogy
Last edited by digster on Wed August 19, 2015 11:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
4/5, would any positions have changed if outliers were removed (say a score over 25 or a 0)?
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- CopperTom
- Champion of RM
- Posts: 10760
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
If you replace LV's 40 with a 20, vs. still scores a 10.6.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
Ask me again when it's all over. For now I'll say that Vs. would have been 6th either way. Vs. was about 100 points ahead of Riot Act, so the 40 points didn't make a difference in the rankings. If he had given it 47 points instead, it would have been #5, though.stip wrote:4/5, would any positions have changed if outliers were removed (say a score over 25 or a 0)?
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33839
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
FUCK4/5 wrote:Ask me again when it's all over. For now I'll say that Vs. would have been 6th either way. Vs. was about 100 points ahead of Riot Act, so the 40 points didn't make a difference in the rankings. If he had given it 47 points instead, it would have been #5, though.stip wrote:4/5, would any positions have changed if outliers were removed (say a score over 25 or a 0)?
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
Backspacer was really hurt by the number of "0" scores, but it's hard to call that an outlier since it was the mode, if I'm not mistaken. But if 0's were eliminated Backspacer would have beaten Lightning Bolt.stip wrote:4/5, would any positions have changed if outliers were removed (say a score over 25 or a 0)?
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
I figured, but a zero is an overly precious score. I'm more interested in whether or not an abnormally high score skewed something in the top 5-6.
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37328
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
I stand by my 0s.stip wrote:I figured, but a zero is an overly precious score. I'm more interested in whether or not an abnormally high score skewed something in the top 5-6.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
we know where you like to stand
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 45834
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
if it makes you feel better, if we had decimal points I'd give Backspacer 0.000347. So it isn't nothing.
Mind you it's not better than nothing, but it isn't nothing.
Mind you it's not better than nothing, but it isn't nothing.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
Remind me when it's all over.stip wrote:I figured, but a zero is an overly precious score. I'm more interested in whether or not an abnormally high score skewed something in the top 5-6.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
1.
2.
3. Vs. 15
4.
5.
6.
7. Riot Act 6
8. S/T 3
9. Backspacer 1
10. Lightning Bolt 1
2.
3. Vs. 15
4.
5.
6.
7. Riot Act 6
8. S/T 3
9. Backspacer 1
10. Lightning Bolt 1
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
The only real problem with scoring Backspacer 0 is that it leaves you no avenue for scoring LB even lower.
(patriotic choking noises)
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37328
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
I almost gave Backspacer a 1 for this very reason but that would have been one less point to give to a good record.McParadigm wrote:The only real problem with scoring Backspacer 0 is that it leaves you no avenue for scoring LB even lower.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16265
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
Vs is Pearl Jam's best album and now I feel terrible I didn't score it higher (I gave five albums an equal score as I think they're all uniformly excellent).
I'm sorry, Vs.
I'm sorry, Vs.
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 45834
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
I can't wait to do this with songs on each album. Get on it Stip.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
-
chewm
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4401
- Joined: Fri July 26, 2013 12:34 am
- Location: chewm
Re: Rank the Albums Again. This Time Weighted! #6: Vs.
We should do that and then multiply the average score of each song (after dividing it by the number of songs by album so songs from shorter albums are not affected) and the average score of its album and make a weighted catalog ranking.