so much thisLoathedVermin72 wrote:I even think his brazen demeanor is bullshit. He's still just politicking, even if it's in a seemingly "bold" way. Don't let his flamboyance make you lose sight of the fact that he is a conservative, white, male billionaire. If you think someone like that is going to "shake things up" in the American government, you've been duped.darth_vedder wrote:Sure, like I said, I'm not voting for the guy, apparently, from the "I Side With" side, I'm on team Bernie. Having said that, I'm actually glad he's running.LoathedVermin72 wrote:He's also an almost overtly racist, misogynist shithead. How refreshing.darth_vedder wrote:I don't know man. I like that he's shaking shit up. I mean, I'm not voting for the guy, but these politicians need a nice kick in the ass. I like that he just flat out calls them all out. They are all a bunch of career politician phonies.LoathedVermin72 wrote:If Trump actually becomes president, than the people in this country are way, way, way stupider assholes than I could have ever imagined.
Election 2016
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Election 2016
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Election 2016
Seriously. Trump is a fucking attention whore. A tv celebrity at this point just looking for attention. He ain't shaking nothin up.
- Yeddie Yedder
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Wed December 24, 2014 7:39 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Election 2016
Agreed. He might be a successful businessman, but he would drive this country straight into the fucking ground. Domestic and Foreign Policy.
I dunno what the GOP is going to do. Geb could surpass Trump by next year. However, do they really want to try and put a 3rd Bush in office? Not sure who else is remotely qualified.
I dunno what the GOP is going to do. Geb could surpass Trump by next year. However, do they really want to try and put a 3rd Bush in office? Not sure who else is remotely qualified.
I live my life like an ocean in disguise
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Election 2016
Yeddie Yedder wrote:Agreed. He might be a successful businessman, but he would drive this country straight into the fucking ground. Domestic and Foreign Policy.
I dunno what the GOP is going to do. Geb could surpass Trump by next year. However, do they really want to try and put a 3rd Bush in office? Not sure who else is remotely qualified.
They need to stop harnessing crazy if they ever want to get their party back on track.
-
nyquillyn
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5825
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: Election 2016
Jeb is actually the frontrunner in the GOP. When it gets right down to it, they'll have a hard time putting Trump against Hills. This has been the trend the last few election cycles for the GOP. It's crazy at first, then "electability" takes over.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Election 2016
Frightens me that its bush/clinton again.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Election 2016
Yeddie Yedder wrote:Agreed. He might be a successful businessman, but he would drive this country straight into the fucking ground. Domestic and Foreign Policy.
I dunno what the GOP is going to do. Geb could surpass Trump by next year. However, do they really want to try and put a 3rd Bush in office? Not sure who else is remotely qualified.
It's a truly scary field. Bush seems the most... sane? Kasich too, but when your entire platform is perceived as anti-educator, you're going to be in deep trouble. I can't imagine that Cruz, Rubio or Walker will get any support from moderates. Paul is going to be seen as too out there, Christie comes off as too corrupt. It almost seems like Trump could win this thing (the republican nomination) and I bet he will get absolutely crushed in the general election.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: Election 2016
Yep. The Sarah Palin experiment is a recent example.turned2black wrote:Jeb is actually the frontrunner in the GOP. When it gets right down to it, they'll have a hard time putting Trump against Hills. This has been the trend the last few election cycles for the GOP. It's crazy at first, then "electability" takes over.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Election 2016
trump v bernie would be awesome@SkitchP wrote:Yeddie Yedder wrote:Agreed. He might be a successful businessman, but he would drive this country straight into the fucking ground. Domestic and Foreign Policy.
I dunno what the GOP is going to do. Geb could surpass Trump by next year. However, do they really want to try and put a 3rd Bush in office? Not sure who else is remotely qualified.
It's a truly scary field. Bush seems the most... sane? Kasich too, but when your entire platform is perceived as anti-educator, you're going to be in deep trouble. I can't imagine that Cruz, Rubio or Walker will get any support from moderates. Paul is going to be seen as too out there, Christie comes off as too corrupt. It almost seems like Trump could win this thing (the republican nomination) and I bet he will get absolutely crushed in the general election.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Election 2016
I think he's talking more of the Rick Santorum in the primaries kind of thing.Kaius wrote:Yep. The Sarah Palin experiment is a recent example.turned2black wrote:Jeb is actually the frontrunner in the GOP. When it gets right down to it, they'll have a hard time putting Trump against Hills. This has been the trend the last few election cycles for the GOP. It's crazy at first, then "electability" takes over.
- Yeddie Yedder
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Wed December 24, 2014 7:39 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Election 2016
Yeah. But, the Palin example does make sense. I think the real fear of Palin being a hospital visit from the Presidency is what cost (or helped cost) McCain the nod.cutuphalfdead wrote:I think he's talking more of the Rick Santorum in the primaries kind of thing.Kaius wrote:Yep. The Sarah Palin experiment is a recent example.turned2black wrote:Jeb is actually the frontrunner in the GOP. When it gets right down to it, they'll have a hard time putting Trump against Hills. This has been the trend the last few election cycles for the GOP. It's crazy at first, then "electability" takes over.
I live my life like an ocean in disguise
- Rob
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2887
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Election 2016
I feel as if Sarah Palin is patient zero in the tea party epidemic. There's always been crazies, but her nomination legitimized them. So naturally, "Trump for president" is an acceptable idea for many now. And it sucks. I'm very much a liberal, but the Democratic party is lame and that isn't likely to change if all they have to do is appear sane.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Election 2016
I get the electability angle. But this feels different. A guy like Santorum does well because he energizes a very specific, but unsustainable, element of the base. Sanders is probably doing the same. Ron Paul was able to also do it on a smaller scale. But those highly involved people were voting anyways, so despite winning primaries, there was no chance of them having an impact in the general election.
Trump is different, for the worse. He somehow is energizing the politically disintrested and angry to at least answer poll questions. If those people start showing up at primaries, we could all be in trouble.
Trump is different, for the worse. He somehow is energizing the politically disintrested and angry to at least answer poll questions. If those people start showing up at primaries, we could all be in trouble.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- Yeddie Yedder
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Wed December 24, 2014 7:39 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Election 2016
And you know what scares me. I was talking to wife's uncle (orthopedic surgeon) and he was quite serious about rallying behind Trump would 100% vote for him. 70 + yo rich white guy...who feels like "i'm old, made my money, let's see what Trump can do"
At first I didn't think he was serious, but he was/is.
...yeah, consider me a little nervous.
At first I didn't think he was serious, but he was/is.
...yeah, consider me a little nervous.
I live my life like an ocean in disguise
- darth_vedder
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6467
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm
Re: Election 2016
I get all that, still glad Trump is running though. And no, I don't think he's going to shake things up in American government if elected. I'm saying he's "shaking it up" in terms of the campaign.cutuphalfdead wrote:so much thisLoathedVermin72 wrote:I even think his brazen demeanor is bullshit. He's still just politicking, even if it's in a seemingly "bold" way. Don't let his flamboyance make you lose sight of the fact that he is a conservative, white, male billionaire. If you think someone like that is going to "shake things up" in the American government, you've been duped.darth_vedder wrote:Sure, like I said, I'm not voting for the guy, apparently, from the "I Side With" side, I'm on team Bernie. Having said that, I'm actually glad he's running.LoathedVermin72 wrote:He's also an almost overtly racist, misogynist shithead. How refreshing.darth_vedder wrote:I don't know man. I like that he's shaking shit up. I mean, I'm not voting for the guy, but these politicians need a nice kick in the ass. I like that he just flat out calls them all out. They are all a bunch of career politician phonies.LoathedVermin72 wrote:If Trump actually becomes president, than the people in this country are way, way, way stupider assholes than I could have ever imagined.
I'm thinking if elected, he'd be so bad that the Dems would take back over Congress, and he'd most likely be a one term president.
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: Election 2016
It's all about name recognition right now. Many of these early polls aren't even narrowing their field to likely primary voters and everybody has heard of Trump. That's a recipe for very early success. He'll flame out. Probably in spectacular fashion.
I think the best case scenario for Democrats would be if he hangs around until March or so and performs well enough that he actually believes he can run a viable 3rd party campaign against a moderate Republican and the Democratic nominee.
I think the best case scenario for Democrats would be if he hangs around until March or so and performs well enough that he actually believes he can run a viable 3rd party campaign against a moderate Republican and the Democratic nominee.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
-
nyquillyn
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5825
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: Election 2016
I just think that what's happen now actually means so very little. At this time two cycles ago, McCain was at the bottom of most polls. I think he was at like 5% in early August. Last cycle in early August Rick Perry was the talk of the GOP field.
I guess the one caveat is that maybe the GOP sees Hills as almost unbeatable and they are more willingly to throw anybody against her. So in that case, maybe Doofus McTrumpyPants makes sense. But I still can't see a scenario where he's the GOP candidate.
I guess the one caveat is that maybe the GOP sees Hills as almost unbeatable and they are more willingly to throw anybody against her. So in that case, maybe Doofus McTrumpyPants makes sense. But I still can't see a scenario where he's the GOP candidate.
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: Election 2016
Nah, your first paragraph had it right, no caveat necessary. Trump has name recognition and even better he has diarrhea of the mouth and is the gift that keeps giving for the media. It's August. The GOP polls mean virtually nothing right now. Also, Hillary isn't close to unbeatable.turned2black wrote:I just think that what's happen now actually means so very little. At this time two cycles ago, McCain was at the bottom of most polls. I think he was at like 5% in early August. Last cycle in early August Rick Perry was the talk of the GOP field.
I guess the one caveat is that maybe the GOP sees Hills as almost unbeatable and they are more willingly to throw anybody against her. So in that case, maybe Doofus McTrumpyPants makes sense. But I still can't see a scenario where he's the GOP candidate.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Election 2016
Are you sure these people were non voters without Trump?@SkitchP wrote:I get the electability angle. But this feels different. A guy like Santorum does well because he energizes a very specific, but unsustainable, element of the base. Sanders is probably doing the same. Ron Paul was able to also do it on a smaller scale. But those highly involved people were voting anyways, so despite winning primaries, there was no chance of them having an impact in the general election.
Trump is different, for the worse. He somehow is energizing the politically disintrested and angry to at least answer poll questions. If those people start showing up at primaries, we could all be in trouble.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Election 2016
You guys get it.4/5 wrote:Nah, your first paragraph had it right, no caveat necessary. Trump has name recognition and even better he has diarrhea of the mouth and is the gift that keeps giving for the media. It's August. The GOP polls mean virtually nothing right now. Also, Hillary isn't close to unbeatable.turned2black wrote:I just think that what's happen now actually means so very little. At this time two cycles ago, McCain was at the bottom of most polls. I think he was at like 5% in early August. Last cycle in early August Rick Perry was the talk of the GOP field.
I guess the one caveat is that maybe the GOP sees Hills as almost unbeatable and they are more willingly to throw anybody against her. So in that case, maybe Doofus McTrumpyPants makes sense. But I still can't see a scenario where he's the GOP candidate.