MLB

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

BigRedLedbetter wrote:That is an interesting idea too though. I could see something like this happening. Especially with the way pitching is these days.
The Players' Association would be all over this. Right now, some AAAA long reliever comes in to mop up for a few innings and then he gets demoted the next day so they can bring up a fresh arm. The PA would love for those guys to be able to keep earning MLB paycheques.
User avatar
BigRedLedbetter
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5401
Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska

Re: MLB

Post by BigRedLedbetter »

philpritchard wrote:
BigRedLedbetter wrote:That is an interesting idea too though. I could see something like this happening. Especially with the way pitching is these days.
The Players' Association would be all over this. Right now, some AAAA long reliever comes in to mop up for a few innings and then he gets demoted the next day so they can bring up a fresh arm. The PA would love for those guys to be able to keep earning MLB paycheques.
I could see 25 men rosters being 27 someday.
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:A team can call up a designated pinch runner that can change games.

Also, not having to burn out all your major league relievers in a blow out is a benefit.
I love that you used that example. On Tuesday, Dalton Pompey was one of the callups for the Jays. That night, in a 7th inning tie, Smoak walked and Pompey came on to run. He proceeded to steal 2nd and 3rd and score on a sac fly. It was pretty amazing.

I agree that it's a benefit and some teams take advantage of it more than others, but I don't really have a problem with it.
I don't have much of a problem with it, I was just trying to give examples that show that it does indeed matter.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

numbers wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:A team can call up a designated pinch runner that can change games.

Also, not having to burn out all your major league relievers in a blow out is a benefit.
I love that you used that example. On Tuesday, Dalton Pompey was one of the callups for the Jays. That night, in a 7th inning tie, Smoak walked and Pompey came on to run. He proceeded to steal 2nd and 3rd and score on a sac fly. It was pretty amazing.

I agree that it's a benefit and some teams take advantage of it more than others, but I don't really have a problem with it.
I don't have much of a problem with it, I was just trying to give examples that show that it does indeed matter.
Cool. I just wanted an excuse to talk about that Pompey sequence.
User avatar
BigRedLedbetter
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5401
Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska

Re: MLB

Post by BigRedLedbetter »

philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:A team can call up a designated pinch runner that can change games.

Also, not having to burn out all your major league relievers in a blow out is a benefit.
I love that you used that example. On Tuesday, Dalton Pompey was one of the callups for the Jays. That night, in a 7th inning tie, Smoak walked and Pompey came on to run. He proceeded to steal 2nd and 3rd and score on a sac fly. It was pretty amazing.

I agree that it's a benefit and some teams take advantage of it more than others, but I don't really have a problem with it.
I don't have much of a problem with it, I was just trying to give examples that show that it does indeed matter.
Cool. I just wanted an excuse to talk about that Pompey sequence.
This is something I will always remember. Fitting that Uecker was calling the game.

"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: MLB

Post by verb_to_trust »

Arrieta is just rolling right now
Dick/Balls
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37473
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

User avatar
MadTIGERmaN
AnalLog
Posts: 1646
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:12 am
Location: The Jungle

Re: MLB

Post by MadTIGERmaN »

The Rosters should definitely be set.
the playoff teams rarely call up many, but a team thats out of it can call up a ton.
So as someone else says, that gives a team more lefties to throw out at Ortiz, more pinch runners, and pinch hitters, and so on.

Doug Melvin has long argued about changing this, and for the most part, the Brewers only call up 1 or 2 players.
On a similar subject, I dont know why teams who are going to limit how many innings a pitcher pitches in a season, start them in April and shut them down in September. Shut them down in April idiots, so youll have them in September/October.
The expanded rosters in April, instead of September would be a way around this. Thats not a bad idea.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

MadTIGERmaN wrote:The Rosters should definitely be set.
the playoff teams rarely call up many, but a team thats out of it can call up a ton.
So as someone else says, that gives a team more lefties to throw out at Ortiz, more pinch runners, and pinch hitters, and so on.

Doug Melvin has long argued about changing this, and for the most part, the Brewers only call up 1 or 2 players.
On a similar subject, I dont know why teams who are going to limit how many innings a pitcher pitches in a season, start them in April and shut them down in September. Shut them down in April idiots, so youll have them in September/October.
The expanded rosters in April, instead of September would be a way around this. Thats not a bad idea.
They should really just give them extra rest or skip starts here and there in the second half of the season.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

I understand trying to keep innings under control, but I don't think teams/agents/players should be so rigid about it. Is it really going to ruin Matt Harvey's career if he throws 30 innings beyond his limit? How has holding Strassburg out of the playoffs a few years ago benefited him since?
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: MLB

Post by @SkitchP »

I am loving phil's genuine excitement right now. It's so refreshing.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

I'm always happy for fan bases that have gone a long time without meaningful baseball. I genuinely am pulling for Toronto, except for this week.
User avatar
MadTIGERmaN
AnalLog
Posts: 1646
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:12 am
Location: The Jungle

Re: MLB

Post by MadTIGERmaN »

I've had Fernandez and Stroman stashed on my DL all year (well Fernandez was off for a few weeks but I did draft him)
so gonna pay off with them both coming back for the last 2/3 weeks of the season.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

@SkitchP wrote:I am loving phil's genuine excitement right now. It's so refreshing.
It's hard not to be excited right now. It's the first meaningful September baseball since 1993.
Fuzzy_Dunlop
A Return To Form
Posts: 152
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 10:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Fuzzy_Dunlop »

numbers wrote:I understand trying to keep innings under control, but I don't think teams/agents/players should be so rigid about it. Is it really going to ruin Matt Harvey's career if he throws 30 innings beyond his limit? How has holding Strassburg out of the playoffs a few years ago benefited him since?
The whole situation was handled in the worst way possible all the way around. Hopefully Harvey pitches great tonight and that's the start of everyone moving past this nonsense.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

numbers wrote:How has holding Strassburg out of the playoffs a few years ago benefited him since?
The problem with this kind of analysis is that it's literally impossible to know.
User avatar
MadTIGERmaN
AnalLog
Posts: 1646
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:12 am
Location: The Jungle

Re: MLB

Post by MadTIGERmaN »

philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:How has holding Strassburg out of the playoffs a few years ago benefited him since?
The problem with this kind of analysis is that it's literally impossible to know.
the sad part, is there is no scientific, or medical proof that the number of pitches raises the chances of an arm injury. There is plenty of pitchers from the past who through way more innings, way more pitches, and had long careers with virtually no problems. Spahn, Paige, Ryan, so on

owners are not so much concerned with the health / arm of the pitcher, as they are with the hit in the pocket book an injury to a pitcher brings, and the only way to insure a pitcher does not get hurt, is for a pitcher to not, pitch.

you could blow your arm out on pitch 10 or pitch 110 or pitch 210, in the first inning, 9th inning, or your 300 inning of the season. Soo i say let em pitch.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

MadTIGERmaN wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:How has holding Strassburg out of the playoffs a few years ago benefited him since?
The problem with this kind of analysis is that it's literally impossible to know.
the sad part, is there is no scientific, or medical proof that the number of pitches raises the chances of an arm injury. There is plenty of pitchers from the past who through way more innings, way more pitches, and had long careers with virtually no problems. Spahn, Paige, Ryan, so on

owners are not so much concerned with the health / arm of the pitcher, as they are with the hit in the pocket book an injury to a pitcher brings, and the only way to insure a pitcher does not get hurt, is for a pitcher to not, pitch.

you could blow your arm out on pitch 10 or pitch 110 or pitch 210, in the first inning, 9th inning, or your 300 inning of the season. Soo i say let em pitch.
Most of those guys weren't putting anywhere near the same stress on their arms as pitchers are now. And I'm guessing teams have way more information to back up their decisions that we could even imagine.
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: MLB

Post by PHATJ »

philpritchard wrote:
Most of those guys weren't putting anywhere near the same stress on their arms as pitchers are now.
How so?
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: MLB

Post by verb_to_trust »

The cubs literally beat the shit out of the cards tonight, specifically Carlos Villanueva.
Dick/Balls
Post Reply