ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by Kevin Davis »

I'm hesitant to call anything a "final peak" until the book has been closed for good. I know it seems unlikely that things will shift in a different direction, but Bob Dylan had over 20 years between "Blood on the Tracks"/"Desire" and "Time Out of Mind," and he went down into some pretty unfathomable valleys.
User avatar
zeb
$5 Donation Gets Custom Title
Posts: 7164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:43 am

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by zeb »

I'd love for that to be true about Pearl Jam too, KD, but it seems so very unlikely.
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by PHATJ »

It's almost like saying Nirvana is about ready to hit their next peak. Or Pink Floyd. Or the Rolling Stones....
User avatar
zeb
$5 Donation Gets Custom Title
Posts: 7164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:43 am

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by zeb »

No it isn't.
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by Kevin Davis »

Oh, I certainly wouldn't put any money on it happening -- they're not a band that seems particularly given to taking a step back and examining what their strengths are at any given time, and without that willingness to tear down and rebuild, it seems unlikely that they'd ever become anything other than an increasingly compromised version of what they've always been. I get that. I was just saying.
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by PHATJ »

Well, it kind of is. Pearl Jam is still alive and active as a band, so they have that going for them. But that's about it. Don't get me wrong, I still love PJ (I even think LB was a really good album), but to think there is any way they could reach a peak again that comes anywhere close to what they were able to achieve at any given point from 1992-1998 is a far far reaching stretch. I hope they have a miracle left in them that hits those lofty peaks, I really do. But it ain't gonna happen.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16264
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by Birds in Hell »

I think the potential for a solo artist to stumble their way back into a fertile creative period is significantly higher than it is for a band.

I honestly can't think of any examples of the latter off the top of my head.
User avatar
given2trade
AnalLog
Posts: 1159
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 4:46 pm

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by given2trade »

2003 was the end of shit being good, not a peak. good tour, good album (in hindsight only, we all though riot act sucked vs previous albums at the time...little did we know what the next 12 years would bring).

peak output = long road/i got shit ; right between vitalogy and no code. it's not even a debate.

best two albums are vitalogy/no code with yield the runner up.

i never saw pearl jam live before 1998 but saw them 14 times that year...was a pretty great tour. but all the live stuff before that was also great so it seems silly to rank peak based on a tour.

so in conclusion, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merkin_Ball

december 5, 1995 - was the peak. but shit was still amazing for a few years after that.
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by PHATJ »

given2trade wrote:2003 was the end of shit being good, not a peak. good tour, good album (in hindsight only, we all though riot act sucked vs previous albums at the time...little did we know what the next 12 years would bring).

peak output = long road/i got shit ; right between vitalogy and no code. it's not even a debate.

best two albums are vitalogy/no code with yield the runner up.

i never saw pearl jam live before 1998 but saw them 14 times that year...was a pretty great tour. but all the live stuff before that was also great so it seems silly to rank peak based on a tour.

so in conclusion, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merkin_Ball

december 5, 1995 - was the peak. but shit was still amazing for a few years after that.
:heartbeat:
User avatar
LetMeSleep
Posting (live)
Posts: 17987
Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Scooby Doo

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by LetMeSleep »

Surely the peak would be the recording date not the release date for Merkinball, if we go with your theory.

Released December 5, 1995
Recorded February 7–10, 1995
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 02, 2026 9:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
given2trade
AnalLog
Posts: 1159
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 4:46 pm

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by given2trade »

LetMeSleep wrote:Surely the peak would be the recording date not the release date for Merkinball, if we go with your theory.

Released December 5, 1995
Recorded February 7–10, 1995
That's funny, I was going to change it to that.

But it's more the 1994-1996 timeframe was peak; output between and including Vitalogy and No Code.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 02, 2026 9:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
gardenparty
AnalLog
Posts: 1629
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 11:52 pm

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by gardenparty »

tragabigzanda wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:I think the potential for a solo artist to stumble their way back into a fertile creative period is significantly higher than it is for a band.

I honestly can't think of any examples of the latter off the top of my head.
Sonic Youth, for sure. I'd rank their Jim O'Rourke-era records amongst their very best.

Blur is another one. A lot of britpop diehards might disagree, but I think their last few albums are easily their best.
Think Tank is my jam
User avatar
hlniv
Future Drummer
Posts: 3098
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by hlniv »

Five peaks listed below, ranked -

First peak (#2) = March/April 1994 (Killer shows / last Vitalogy tunes recorded / SNL)

Highest peak (#1) = March 1998 (Jack Irons live, including Yield tunes - live performance quality peak)

Creative peak (#4) = Sept/Oct 1999 (Binaural and outtakes recorded, fresh studio experimentation with Matt Cameron)

Next peak (#3) = June/July 2003 (Probably the most unique live songs played by a band in 60 days in all of rock history - 15 different openers in 33 shows, for example)

Last peak (#5) = July 2006 (14 show West Coast leg in one month was last great live run)


Honorable Mention -

Sept 1991 -Apr 1992 - Dave A joins, plays first shows, and records with the band for the first time
Fall 1993 - Vitalogy tunes debuted live, Animal at VMA's
Summer 1995 - Classic shows with Jack on a doomed tour, No Code songs begin to be recorded
May/June 2000 - European leg, Binaural tunes debuted live
Sept 2011 - PJ20
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by numbers »

Kevin Davis wrote:Surprised to see so many people listing '03. It was a good tour but in my eyes clearly not a career peak.
I feel like 03 is when they fell in love with being a live band, but before they embraced it too much.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by epilogue »

1998 is absolutely the right answer. This thread should have been locked 2 pages ago.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

what was pearl jam's peak date, hour, and minute
User avatar
LetMeSleep
Posting (live)
Posts: 17987
Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Scooby Doo

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by LetMeSleep »

March 9, 1998. Sydney. About 2039 after Long Road and Hail, Hail they blast through Brain Of J. Peaked.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: ITT We Nominate Pearl Jam's Peak Year

Post by epilogue »

/thread
Post Reply