Birds in Hell wrote:I only had time to give it a cursory read earlier so I'm hesitant to agree with the article wholesale but I certainly do have a degree of sympathy for the idea that the popular arts have become aggressively and unavoidably more low brow and that all of us are probably poorer for it. I realise this makes me sound like a dreadful curmudgeon but I don't hold myself apart from that criticism - I think my tastes are as deeply flawed as anybody else's, probably more so. I've unavoidably been shaped by that culture too.Strat wrote:I used to think Spenno was an 85 year old grandpa but now im wondering if im not off by 100 years.cutuphalfdead wrote:of course you doBirds in Hell wrote:I think he has a point.BurtReynolds wrote:What a society of uncultured ruffians we've become!
As an aside because it's briefly mentioned in the piece and it seems like something that's often brought up in these discussions, I'm not remotely persuaded that there is anything inequitable about the payments flowing to artists from streaming services. A few cents per streamed song honestly seems about right to me, it's not as though the listener doesn't have the option to pay more for a permanent copy in some form if they choose to.
im actually in agreement with you on the main point as well. Music matters to me and i wish it really meant something to the greater public. These sort of articles are difficult for me to relate to in the sense that I stream music yet I fucking love music and its not just a matter of ease for me. I dont want a hit single that gets wallowed up in some bad playlist I make. Streaming music has helped me discover so many artists I may never have and ive become even more passionate about music because of it. I understand this is probably not the case for 95% of "music" listeners around the globe.