Income split, royalties, etc.
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 45833
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
- noneofyabidness
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed November 12, 2014 8:48 am
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
They do.Biff Pocoroba wrote:In a similiar line of thinking what about covers performed on Pearl Jam bootlegs? Does Neil Young get something for every Rockin' in the Free World and Victoria Williams something for every Crazy Mary? Don't they have to pay something to get to perform them anyway?
No doubt there's well established legacy musicians living well off past success. I thinking more of newer acts from the past few years or bands just getting established as viable.
Even better, every time Pearl Jam performs in a foreign country, they get royalties for their own songs.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
I haven't read through the entire thread so forgive me if this has been mentioned or whatever.
I know for most local music clubs, they have to pay some sort of fee so that bands playing at their club can play cover songs. Its not up to the band but up to the venue to handle this. A lump sum of sorts or something, no?
I know for most local music clubs, they have to pay some sort of fee so that bands playing at their club can play cover songs. Its not up to the band but up to the venue to handle this. A lump sum of sorts or something, no?
- Mine
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
It's similar in Europe and technically the organiser of the event handles it not the venue itself.
- noneofyabidness
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed November 12, 2014 8:48 am
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
The bar I used to work at had to pay ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC. We also had to pay a separate license for our jukebox. Luckily that thing went away. Interestingly, SESAC demanded the most amount of money, despite having a smaller list of artists. We told SESAC to go fuck themselves and removed all of their artists from the jukebox and computer. Fuck SESACStrat wrote:I haven't read through the entire thread so forgive me if this has been mentioned or whatever.
I know for most local music clubs, they have to pay some sort of fee so that bands playing at their club can play cover songs. Its not up to the band but up to the venue to handle this. A lump sum of sorts or something, no?
- Jessica Fletcher
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed October 29, 2014 6:22 am
- Location: Cabot Cove, ME
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
The last thing you want to have to worry about when using art to sell alcohol is making sure the artists are fairly compensated.noneofyabidness wrote:The bar I used to work at had to pay ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC. We also had to pay a separate license for our jukebox. Luckily that thing went away. Interestingly, SESAC demanded the most amount of money, despite having a smaller list of artists. We told SESAC to go fuck themselves and removed all of their artists from the jukebox and computer. Fuck SESACStrat wrote:I haven't read through the entire thread so forgive me if this has been mentioned or whatever.
I know for most local music clubs, they have to pay some sort of fee so that bands playing at their club can play cover songs. Its not up to the band but up to the venue to handle this. A lump sum of sorts or something, no?
- noneofyabidness
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed November 12, 2014 8:48 am
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
I'm all about fairly compensating bands, but SESAC is truly terrible. The Jukebox had a SESAC license that was part of the deal for the jukebox from the jukebox outfitter. The SESAC rep came in and claimed we didn't have a SESAC license of the jukebox and demanded that we pay a sum that was more of less double what we were paying to ASCAP and BMI combined. I think the jukebox had one SESAC artist (Dylan) and the computer had maybe three.
Never had a problem with ASCAP or BMI
Never had a problem with ASCAP or BMI
- Jessica Fletcher
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed October 29, 2014 6:22 am
- Location: Cabot Cove, ME
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
Hmm, interesting. Doing a bit more reading (Wikipedia) I see that SESAC is a private company (vs. ASCAP and BMI non-profits, if that matters) that "retains an undisclosed amount of performance royalty income". I take your point.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 02, 2026 10:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35453
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
i wish more long winded RM posts ended with a bit of humor like thistragabigzanda wrote:Aight, I was all high and mighty before, but the tryptophan and liquor have since put me in my place...
There is "publishing," and "publishing." The first sort includes both publishing and writing credits, so every song's royalties are immediately split and administered right down the middle, 50% to the writers, and 50% to the publishers. A typical 1990s record deal would let the band embers divy up the writers portion as they saw fit, with the publishers portion being split according to their unique contract -- though the label's publishing arm (in PJ's case, Sony/ATV) would most often control 100% of the publishing (or 50% of the total publishing...See how the language makes this unnecessarily complicated?).
I remember reading in the Kim Neely book that sometime around Vs, the band decided to give Ed 40% of the "publishing," which I took to mean 40% of the writing -- meaning the other members would get 15% each, with 50% of all publishing royalties still going to the label. As someone stated earlier, the band likely recouped their advances against writing royalties after the first record, so I would assume that subsequently, every dollar made from a song broke down thusly:
50¢ to Sony/ATV from publishing
20¢ to EV from writing
7.5¢ for each other band members' writing share
To make it all more confusing, every song also has an administrative owner of the master tapes (meaning the physical master copy they is housed somewhere in the sony archives). This would be Sony Music, and a friend of mine who works at said company claims that they still own the masters (hence the Sony imprint on all the reissue stuff). But of course everything from S/T onward is different, with PJ owning their masters from then on.
Now consider that the CD used to cost the company about 9-13¢ to manufacture, and could retail for $10-20. Hand over fist, right? But the decline in CD sales, and PJ's move towards independence, have both certainly had an enormous impact on their bottom line, necessitating the need for steady touring, marketable songs ("Hear the sirens..."), and merch. Also consider that given the changes in the industry, as well as the addition of Boom, and there's really no telling what sort of breakdown they're dealing with now. A few facts remain: their music is less challenging, though it allows them to place their music in Gray's Anatomy, thereby bankrolling not only their dedicated staff, but also their pet projects (Vitalogy Foundation, etc). CD sales continue to decline, vinyl sales are increasing but not enough to support their lifestyle, and Spotify, etc are paying shit to artists. I think that ultimately, history will look back very kindly on this band for their commitment to independence, good causes, and mostly passionate music. But that doesn't negate the fact that their albums have become increasingly predictable, and Ed has a fire pole in his house.
- Alex
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5740
- Joined: Fri August 16, 2013 6:36 pm
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
a lot of mcparadigm posts end with a "fire pole in the house"spike wrote:i wish more long winded RM posts ended with a bit of humor like thistragabigzanda wrote:Aight, I was all high and mighty before, but the tryptophan and liquor have since put me in my place...
There is "publishing," and "publishing." The first sort includes both publishing and writing credits, so every song's royalties are immediately split and administered right down the middle, 50% to the writers, and 50% to the publishers. A typical 1990s record deal would let the band embers divy up the writers portion as they saw fit, with the publishers portion being split according to their unique contract -- though the label's publishing arm (in PJ's case, Sony/ATV) would most often control 100% of the publishing (or 50% of the total publishing...See how the language makes this unnecessarily complicated?).
I remember reading in the Kim Neely book that sometime around Vs, the band decided to give Ed 40% of the "publishing," which I took to mean 40% of the writing -- meaning the other members would get 15% each, with 50% of all publishing royalties still going to the label. As someone stated earlier, the band likely recouped their advances against writing royalties after the first record, so I would assume that subsequently, every dollar made from a song broke down thusly:
50¢ to Sony/ATV from publishing
20¢ to EV from writing
7.5¢ for each other band members' writing share
To make it all more confusing, every song also has an administrative owner of the master tapes (meaning the physical master copy they is housed somewhere in the sony archives). This would be Sony Music, and a friend of mine who works at said company claims that they still own the masters (hence the Sony imprint on all the reissue stuff). But of course everything from S/T onward is different, with PJ owning their masters from then on.
Now consider that the CD used to cost the company about 9-13¢ to manufacture, and could retail for $10-20. Hand over fist, right? But the decline in CD sales, and PJ's move towards independence, have both certainly had an enormous impact on their bottom line, necessitating the need for steady touring, marketable songs ("Hear the sirens..."), and merch. Also consider that given the changes in the industry, as well as the addition of Boom, and there's really no telling what sort of breakdown they're dealing with now. A few facts remain: their music is less challenging, though it allows them to place their music in Gray's Anatomy, thereby bankrolling not only their dedicated staff, but also their pet projects (Vitalogy Foundation, etc). CD sales continue to decline, vinyl sales are increasing but not enough to support their lifestyle, and Spotify, etc are paying shit to artists. I think that ultimately, history will look back very kindly on this band for their commitment to independence, good causes, and mostly passionate music. But that doesn't negate the fact that their albums have become increasingly predictable, and Ed has a fire pole in his house.
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35453
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
yeah, mcp has this skilll down. especially the long winded part.Alex wrote:a lot of mcparadigm posts end with a "fire pole in the house"spike wrote:i wish more long winded RM posts ended with a bit of humor like thistragabigzanda wrote:Aight, I was all high and mighty before, but the tryptophan and liquor have since put me in my place...
There is "publishing," and "publishing." The first sort includes both publishing and writing credits, so every song's royalties are immediately split and administered right down the middle, 50% to the writers, and 50% to the publishers. A typical 1990s record deal would let the band embers divy up the writers portion as they saw fit, with the publishers portion being split according to their unique contract -- though the label's publishing arm (in PJ's case, Sony/ATV) would most often control 100% of the publishing (or 50% of the total publishing...See how the language makes this unnecessarily complicated?).
I remember reading in the Kim Neely book that sometime around Vs, the band decided to give Ed 40% of the "publishing," which I took to mean 40% of the writing -- meaning the other members would get 15% each, with 50% of all publishing royalties still going to the label. As someone stated earlier, the band likely recouped their advances against writing royalties after the first record, so I would assume that subsequently, every dollar made from a song broke down thusly:
50¢ to Sony/ATV from publishing
20¢ to EV from writing
7.5¢ for each other band members' writing share
To make it all more confusing, every song also has an administrative owner of the master tapes (meaning the physical master copy they is housed somewhere in the sony archives). This would be Sony Music, and a friend of mine who works at said company claims that they still own the masters (hence the Sony imprint on all the reissue stuff). But of course everything from S/T onward is different, with PJ owning their masters from then on.
Now consider that the CD used to cost the company about 9-13¢ to manufacture, and could retail for $10-20. Hand over fist, right? But the decline in CD sales, and PJ's move towards independence, have both certainly had an enormous impact on their bottom line, necessitating the need for steady touring, marketable songs ("Hear the sirens..."), and merch. Also consider that given the changes in the industry, as well as the addition of Boom, and there's really no telling what sort of breakdown they're dealing with now. A few facts remain: their music is less challenging, though it allows them to place their music in Gray's Anatomy, thereby bankrolling not only their dedicated staff, but also their pet projects (Vitalogy Foundation, etc). CD sales continue to decline, vinyl sales are increasing but not enough to support their lifestyle, and Spotify, etc are paying shit to artists. I think that ultimately, history will look back very kindly on this band for their commitment to independence, good causes, and mostly passionate music. But that doesn't negate the fact that their albums have become increasingly predictable, and Ed has a fire pole in his house.
- Sgt. Crackpot
- F.U.B.A.R
- Posts: 9104
- Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
- Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
- Location: Lft Craquepeau
- Contact:
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
Last night I was exhausted from walking around and drinking beers all day, so I decided to take a little nap in my hotel room before going out. The nap turned out to be like four hours long and I woke up at 2 AM, really hungry. There's not much open at 2 AM in Mar del Plata, so I prowled the deserted streets until I found this run-down burger joint named "Fast and Funny". Without thinking much, I order the "Fast and Funny burger", thinking if it bears the restaurant's name it's gotta be decent.spike wrote:yeah, mcp has this skilll down. especially the long winded part.Alex wrote:a lot of mcparadigm posts end with a "fire pole in the house"spike wrote:i wish more long winded RM posts ended with a bit of humor like thistragabigzanda wrote:Aight, I was all high and mighty before, but the tryptophan and liquor have since put me in my place...
There is "publishing," and "publishing." The first sort includes both publishing and writing credits, so every song's royalties are immediately split and administered right down the middle, 50% to the writers, and 50% to the publishers. A typical 1990s record deal would let the band embers divy up the writers portion as they saw fit, with the publishers portion being split according to their unique contract -- though the label's publishing arm (in PJ's case, Sony/ATV) would most often control 100% of the publishing (or 50% of the total publishing...See how the language makes this unnecessarily complicated?).
I remember reading in the Kim Neely book that sometime around Vs, the band decided to give Ed 40% of the "publishing," which I took to mean 40% of the writing -- meaning the other members would get 15% each, with 50% of all publishing royalties still going to the label. As someone stated earlier, the band likely recouped their advances against writing royalties after the first record, so I would assume that subsequently, every dollar made from a song broke down thusly:
50¢ to Sony/ATV from publishing
20¢ to EV from writing
7.5¢ for each other band members' writing share
To make it all more confusing, every song also has an administrative owner of the master tapes (meaning the physical master copy they is housed somewhere in the sony archives). This would be Sony Music, and a friend of mine who works at said company claims that they still own the masters (hence the Sony imprint on all the reissue stuff). But of course everything from S/T onward is different, with PJ owning their masters from then on.
Now consider that the CD used to cost the company about 9-13¢ to manufacture, and could retail for $10-20. Hand over fist, right? But the decline in CD sales, and PJ's move towards independence, have both certainly had an enormous impact on their bottom line, necessitating the need for steady touring, marketable songs ("Hear the sirens..."), and merch. Also consider that given the changes in the industry, as well as the addition of Boom, and there's really no telling what sort of breakdown they're dealing with now. A few facts remain: their music is less challenging, though it allows them to place their music in Gray's Anatomy, thereby bankrolling not only their dedicated staff, but also their pet projects (Vitalogy Foundation, etc). CD sales continue to decline, vinyl sales are increasing but not enough to support their lifestyle, and Spotify, etc are paying shit to artists. I think that ultimately, history will look back very kindly on this band for their commitment to independence, good causes, and mostly passionate music. But that doesn't negate the fact that their albums have become increasingly predictable, and Ed has a fire pole in his house.
No such luck. It was a four-story misshapen monstrosity, begging for a mercy kill. The beef tasted like ground-up death. And charcoal. And something that used to be food. The plasticky cheddar tasted like a slab of someone's wallet. I thought I could power through it by applying some mustard, but it only made it worse. Got about 35% through before giving up.
I walked to the beach and watched the waves surging forward and collapsing upon the rocks. I dreamt about black sludge all night.
I wouldn't say it is a "closeness" as much as it is a very unique mutual respect. It is a type of respect I do not share with anyone else in my different social circles.
It is very much a team mentality, but different in that progress comes as much from within as it does from the external forces of your training partners. Steel sharpens steel, but one must forge and then wield their sword individually.
Jiujitsu first submits the ego. After an unknown length of time, which varies per individual, it calms the nerves and sharpens awareness. Eventually it elevates confidence and one begins to evolve not just into a better fighter, but a better human.
Personally, nothing else has really compared to the wide range of feelings it has given me. I feel that I owe a lot of gratitude to the art, so I've installed a fire pole in the house.
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
I keep waiting for that gif to move, sarge, but it's still just words.
(patriotic choking noises)
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
This seems like a reasonable place to put this.
Billboard Magazine: 300 Best Selling Albums Worldwide, 2009
Billboard Magazine: 300 Best Selling Albums Worldwide, 2009
- Spoiler: show
(patriotic choking noises)
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51788
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
sad that the highest Beatles' album is "One".
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- evenslow
- Stone's Bitch
- Posts: 9164
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
- Location: unnamed mental hospital
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
Through 2009 is the nearest year they have?
If they did it through 2015 I'm sure Backspacer would be top 10.
If they did it through 2015 I'm sure Backspacer would be top 10.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
-
swan
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
Evanescence??? 14 million????
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
Kind of surprised by that list. I had always thought VS and TEn outsold most of Nirvana albums.
Michael Jackson really is the king.
Michael Jackson really is the king.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Income split, royalties, etc.
US sales usually account for 33-45% of an album's total. For PJ's early records, it's closer to 60-70%. After Vitalogy, their popularity drop in the US put it closer to 50% (Yield sold 1.4 million in the US in its first year, and 3 million world wide). So they do top Nirvana in the US.Strat wrote:Kind of surprised by that list. I had always thought VS and TEn outsold most of Nirvana albums.
Michael Jackson really is the king.
Also, all Nirvana records saw massive sales jumps after Kurt died. In Utero had sold less than 4 world wide at the time of his death. Now it's over 10 million.
(patriotic choking noises)