Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

General Pearl Jam discussion.
User avatar
Wendy Carlos's Twin
Future Drummer
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by Wendy Carlos's Twin »

The Reading show is decent but probably the 2nd weakest of all the professionally recorded shows. (The Melbourne '92 show takes the taco...hideous performance.)
User avatar
matt reeder
AnalLog
Posts: 1509
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:34 pm

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by matt reeder »

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:The Reading show is decent but probably the 2nd weakest of all the professionally recorded shows. (The Melbourne '92 show takes the taco...hideous performance.)
From a performance standpoint it's not the greatest but I'm sure everybody who was at the show loved it. And frankly, it's nice to hear them a little looser at times. There are a lot of great performances from this show.
bodysnatcher wrote:
matt reeder wrote:Case in point:



They barely rehearsed for what was the definitive concert of their career, and yet nailed this show (a terrible, terrible version of "Love Buzz" not withstanding). There were better concerts but this remains perhaps the defining moment of their career - and they barely rehearsed. They had an effortless brilliance that was timeless. This footage is still thrilling to me something like 20 years after I first heard it.
I think this hits on a lot of Nirvana's allure. Part of their appeal... or schtik... or whatever... was the fact that they were so loose, but tight at the same time. They were spastic, seemingly unrehearsed. They had that air about them that you just didn't really know what was about to happen... that they could become unhinged at any given moment. And maybe that was all on purpose, but I don't think so. I hate the word "dangerous" when people describe music or art, or anything that's not really dangerous at all. But they had something about them that just tightroped that line of uneasiness, but were still extremely appealing. I think that's where Kurt was good.... he could craft a pop song that was so catchy, but masked it in just enough punk attitude that it could draw anyone from 12 years old to 35 years old.
Pretty much. It's interesting to me that Nirvana has endured so much. I teach at our local community college and my students know about my musical tastes. Many of my younger students have never heard a Pearl Jam song but they all know Nirvana. It's weird to me but I get it.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by stip »

I can't speak for anyone's experience outside of the US, but this story (in the US) is completely colored by the fact that cobain killed himself and Eddie did not. Nirvana's mystique is irrevocably bound up in his death as much, if not more, than the music. You could make that danger argument about any of their peers and all of the music (the one exception perhaps being Chris Cornell as an artist - I would still include soundgarden as a band)
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by McParadigm »

I think this hits on a lot of Green Day's allure. Part of their appeal... or schtik... or whatever... was the fact that they were so loose, but tight at the same time. They were spastic, seemingly unrehearsed. They had that air about them that you just didn't really know what was about to happen... that they could become unhinged at any given moment. And maybe that was all on purpose, but I don't think so. I hate the word "dangerous" when people describe music or art, or anything that's not really dangerous at all. But they had something about them that just tightroped that line of uneasiness, but were still extremely appealing. I think that's where Billie Joe was good.... he could craft a pop song that was so catchy, but masked it in just enough punk attitude that it could draw anyone from 12 years old to 35 years old.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by McParadigm »

Wait. Was his name Billie Joe? I feel like that's supposed to be right, but that's not really a name.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by epilogue »

stip wrote:I can't speak for anyone's experience outside of the US, but this story (in the US) is completely colored by the fact that cobain killed himself and Eddie did not. Nirvana's mystique is irrevocably bound up in his death as much, if not more, than the music. You could make that danger argument about any of their peers and all of the music (the one exception perhaps being Chris Cornell as an artist - I would still include soundgarden as a band)
Nirvana caught my attention and mattered more to me immediately. Pearl Jam didn't bloom into my all time favorite band until Vitalogy. Kurt's death affected me profoundly and I wonder if Pearl Jam would have become what they became for me if Kurt hadn't died. I just don't know.

It's true that Kurt's death helped/enhanced Nirvana insofar as Nirvana never had the chance to disappoint, to release a subpar record or even age into something. Pearl Jam did. They lost some of their shine as a result, probably. Which is understandable.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by McParadigm »

durdencommatyler wrote:It's true that Kurt's death helped/enhanced Nirvana insofar as Nirvana never had the chance to disappoint, to release a subpar record or even age into something. Pearl Jam did. They lost some of their shine as a result, probably. Which is understandable.
It also blew their album sales out of the water, which absolutely changes the way people look at you in retrospect. It turned them from "the important band" to "the important and maybe the biggest." In Utero's sales were barely above what No Code later achieved before Kurt passed, and Nevermind also soared up pretty hard in the aftermath.

Neither of these albums would be close to Ten and Vitalogy in terms of sales, otherwise. They just didn't have that kind of momentum at the time.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by Mine »

I know I'm stating the obvious but this is hardly something unique to Nirvana. Especially those who die young retain all the mystique and whatever else appeals to a certain demographic. Jim Morrison had higher career peaks after he died than when he was still alive pretty much the same goes for Joplin and Hendrix.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by epilogue »

McParadigm wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:It's true that Kurt's death helped/enhanced Nirvana insofar as Nirvana never had the chance to disappoint, to release a subpar record or even age into something. Pearl Jam did. They lost some of their shine as a result, probably. Which is understandable.
It also blew their album sales out of the water, which absolutely changes the way people look at you in retrospect. It turned them from "the important band" to "the important and maybe the biggest." In Utero's sales were barely above what No Code later achieved before Kurt passed, and Nevermind also soared up pretty hard in the aftermath.

Neither of these albums would be close to Ten and Vitalogy in terms of sales, otherwise. They just didn't have that kind of momentum at the time.
Well, maybe, maybe not. It's hard to say that something else might not have come along that shot up those sales. But you're probably right.

Still, Pearl Jam was always built to sell out arenas all over the world, whether Eddie wanted to admit that back at the Off Ramp or not.

I'm not sure Nirvana was built that way. Which is not to say that I think Kurt didn't want to be successful, or that Nirvana couldn't also pack an arena.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by epilogue »

Mine wrote:I know I'm stating the obvious but this is hardly something unique to Nirvana. Especially those who die young retain all the mystique and whatever else appeals to a certain demographic. Jim Morrison had higher career peaks after he died than when he was still alive pretty much the same goes for Joplin and Hendrix.
Exactly.

Circumstances also matter to a degree. The more room there is for urban legends and doubt the more magical and mystical and interesting the artist's death becomes, the more weight it carries and the more sales it generates.

I mean christ, even Paul McCartney's "death" sold records.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by McParadigm »

There is no better example of unnecessary post-death eulogizing than Sublime.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by epilogue »

McParadigm wrote:There is no better example of unnecessary post-death eulogizing than Sublime.
:haha:

:|
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by Norah »

it's true
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by Mine »

durdencommatyler wrote:
Mine wrote:I know I'm stating the obvious but this is hardly something unique to Nirvana. Especially those who die young retain all the mystique and whatever else appeals to a certain demographic. Jim Morrison had higher career peaks after he died than when he was still alive pretty much the same goes for Joplin and Hendrix.
Exactly.

Circumstances also matter to a degree. The more room there is for urban legends and doubt the more magical and mystical and interesting the artist's death becomes, the more weight it carries and the more sales it generates.

I mean christ, even Paul McCartney's "death" sold records.
:haha: i should have thought of that.

There are urban legends for everybody i can think of right now.
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by Mine »

McParadigm wrote:There is no better example of unnecessary post-death eulogizing than Sublime.
Post-death eulogizing can be as hypocritical and cynical as public statements or PR strategies go.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by bodysnatcher »

i hated Sublime.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by stip »

cutuphalfdead wrote:it's true
God yes
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by epilogue »

Ya-ya-eeeee-ya-yaaaaa, ya. Ya.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 02, 2026 9:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Self
Polluted
Posts: 4644
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
Location: PM me, I have everything.

Re: Pearl Jam vs. Nirvana

Post by Self »

tragabigzanda wrote:What sucked about Sublime was the jocks and other assholes who all glommed on. It really sucked to have a funny, not bad song like Date Rape come on at a high school party, and hear all the jocks go "Yaaaaa!" and high-five each other, knowing full well that at least a couple would be guilty of date rape later that night.
Rape Maaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyy
Post Reply