She's too classy for that.stip wrote:is strat counting down the days to the debut of the Slave Rey outfit?
how do i marry this gal?
She's too classy for that.stip wrote:is strat counting down the days to the debut of the Slave Rey outfit?
I called dibs on her pages agoHardTI wrote:Strat... she's mine.
We've touched on it earlier in this thread, but this whole notion of SW "transcending" being "just films" I find to be total nonsense. I hate that kind of thinking. It's the same kind of thought process that places classic films above any kind of reproach in the minds of many. SW, and all other films, are just that, and should be viewed, criticized, and discussed as just that. Everything else is distraction. Saying that the prequels being made you suddenly engage with the OT in a critical way only says something about you and nothing about the films themselves.stip wrote:what do you take issue with here?LoathedVermin72 wrote:We really could not be more diametrically opposed in the way we approach seemingly everything, stip.stip wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:The prequels managed to highlight the things that were bad about the OT. Things people were willing to let go or overlook or maybe didn't even notice in the way the movies were plotted and written became ugly and obvious. People began to rewatch the OT through the lens of the PT. Those movies were so bad, they made the flaws in other movies obvious to those how had never seen or cared about them before.
pretty much. The power of those movies is really in what they awakened in people (no pun intended), as much if not more than their value as films. Though they're still on point in that regard, their legacy and impact transcends the filmmaking. And the prequels damaged the idea of star wars by showing that they are just movies, and could be bad movies, and made me reevaluate the OT as movies in a way I would not have done before.
Spoiler that shit!stip wrote:is strat counting down the days to the debut of the Slave Rey outfit?
McParadigm wrote:lol
Simple Torture wrote:Spoiler that shit!stip wrote:is strat counting down the days to the debut of the Slave Rey outfit?
Fisher warns, a ton of people will probably have creepy fantasies about her, but she should not relinquish her power to say no to a “slave outfit,” referring to the iconic metal bikini she wore in Return of the Jedi.
“Listen! I am not a sex symbol, so that’s an opinion of someone. I don’t share that,” Fisher tells the star in the winding interview. ” You should fight for your outfit. Don’t be a slave like I was.”
“All right, I’ll fight,” Ridley says.
“You keep fighting against that slave outfit,” Fisher adds.
No one said or even implied (that I recall) it was about the films themselves, though. Of course it only says something about the person watching. Obviously, they are just films. That was never actually in contention.LoathedVermin72 wrote:We've touched on it earlier in this thread, but this whole notion of SW "transcending" being "just films" I find to be total nonsense. I hate that kind of thinking. It's the same kind of thought process that places classic films above any kind of reproach in the minds of many. SW, and all other films, are just that, and should be viewed, criticized, and discussed as just that. Everything else is distraction. Saying that the prequels being made you suddenly engage with the OT in a critical way only says something about you and nothing about the films themselves.stip wrote:what do you take issue with here?LoathedVermin72 wrote:We really could not be more diametrically opposed in the way we approach seemingly everything, stip.stip wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:The prequels managed to highlight the things that were bad about the OT. Things people were willing to let go or overlook or maybe didn't even notice in the way the movies were plotted and written became ugly and obvious. People began to rewatch the OT through the lens of the PT. Those movies were so bad, they made the flaws in other movies obvious to those how had never seen or cared about them before.
pretty much. The power of those movies is really in what they awakened in people (no pun intended), as much if not more than their value as films. Though they're still on point in that regard, their legacy and impact transcends the filmmaking. And the prequels damaged the idea of star wars by showing that they are just movies, and could be bad movies, and made me reevaluate the OT as movies in a way I would not have done before.
I hope this doesn't sound harsh or insulting, because I don't mean it to. Just being honest. As someone who values film and art culture, I think this kind of stuff is important.
I love Carrie Fisher so much.B wrote:Simple Torture wrote:Spoiler that shit!stip wrote:is strat counting down the days to the debut of the Slave Rey outfit?Fisher warns, a ton of people will probably have creepy fantasies about her, but she should not relinquish her power to say no to a “slave outfit,” referring to the iconic metal bikini she wore in Return of the Jedi.
“Listen! I am not a sex symbol, so that’s an opinion of someone. I don’t share that,” Fisher tells the star in the winding interview. ” You should fight for your outfit. Don’t be a slave like I was.”
“All right, I’ll fight,” Ridley says.
“You keep fighting against that slave outfit,” Fisher adds.
Good talk.Kaius wrote:Yes, but in the context of judging the quality of these films, especially after seeing other, lesser quality films in the series, what does it mean?durdencommatyler wrote:It's a metaphor guys. Christ.Kaius wrote:I am also slightly perplexed.LoathedVermin72 wrote:THEY WERE ALWAYS FILMS
Kaius wrote:Good talk.Kaius wrote:Yes, but in the context of judging the quality of these films, especially after seeing other, lesser quality films in the series, what does it mean?durdencommatyler wrote:It's a metaphor guys. Christ.Kaius wrote:I am also slightly perplexed.LoathedVermin72 wrote:THEY WERE ALWAYS FILMS
durdencommatyler wrote:This can't be serious. Stop fucking with me, K.
SexyLoathedVermin72 wrote:Joey
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
So, it's the internet?tommymtcom wrote:I like what you guys have done with this thread. It's got a real nice blend of nerdiness and hostility.
Good day, sir.durdencommatyler wrote:Kaius wrote:Good talk.Kaius wrote:Yes, but in the context of judging the quality of these films, especially after seeing other, lesser quality films in the series, what does it mean?durdencommatyler wrote:It's a metaphor guys. Christ.Kaius wrote:I am also slightly perplexed.LoathedVermin72 wrote:THEY WERE ALWAYS FILMSdurdencommatyler wrote:This can't be serious. Stop fucking with me, K.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy